P. Kulshreshtha, Osama Neyaz, Shahena Begum, Raj Kumar Yadav, K. Deepak
{"title":"高压氧疗法对纤维肌痛患者疼痛的疗效和安全性评估:随机对照研究的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"P. Kulshreshtha, Osama Neyaz, Shahena Begum, Raj Kumar Yadav, K. Deepak","doi":"10.4103/jme.jme_102_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive treatment for chronic pain. The current study aimed to perform a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of HBOT for pain reduction in fibromyalgia (FM) patients compared to conventional therapy. A systematic search of medical subject headings and keywords associated with HBOT for FM patients was conducted using electronic databases: MEDLINE/ PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Google Scholar was also combed to detect likely non-indexed available studies. We also searched manually through reference lists of identified original articles or reviews for relevant articles. The http://www.clinicaltrial.gov was examined for all research protocols being conducted/ planned. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and Higgins and Thompson’s I2 method determined the risk of bias and heterogeneity. The primary outcome was the effect of HBOT on pain; secondary outcomes included adverse effects of HBOT, assessment of the quality of life, functional impairment, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality. The overall quality of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Cochrane RevMan software (version 5.4) was used for data analysis. Results were synthesised through a general summary of the characteristics and findings of each study. We also analysed different HBOT protocols and their outcomes across the studies. Five RCTs enrolling 91 and 89 patients in FM and control groups were included in the present study. HBOT results in decreased tender points (-6.23 (95 % CI: -7.76, -4.71) P < 0.0001), increased pain threshold (0.57 (95% CI: 0.3, 0.83) P < 0.00001) and a decreased Visual Analog scale (VAS) score for pain (-5.31(95 % CI: -8.17, -2.45)). Quality of life, sleep, functional impairment, etc., also improved after HBOT. HBOT is effective in pain and other associated outcomes in FM patients. In FM patients, high-quality evidence in favour of HBOT to improve pain, fatigue, quality of life, sleep, psychological outcomes, etc., is required.","PeriodicalId":251651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Evidence","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Pain in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Studies\",\"authors\":\"P. Kulshreshtha, Osama Neyaz, Shahena Begum, Raj Kumar Yadav, K. Deepak\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jme.jme_102_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive treatment for chronic pain. The current study aimed to perform a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of HBOT for pain reduction in fibromyalgia (FM) patients compared to conventional therapy. A systematic search of medical subject headings and keywords associated with HBOT for FM patients was conducted using electronic databases: MEDLINE/ PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Google Scholar was also combed to detect likely non-indexed available studies. We also searched manually through reference lists of identified original articles or reviews for relevant articles. The http://www.clinicaltrial.gov was examined for all research protocols being conducted/ planned. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and Higgins and Thompson’s I2 method determined the risk of bias and heterogeneity. The primary outcome was the effect of HBOT on pain; secondary outcomes included adverse effects of HBOT, assessment of the quality of life, functional impairment, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality. The overall quality of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Cochrane RevMan software (version 5.4) was used for data analysis. Results were synthesised through a general summary of the characteristics and findings of each study. We also analysed different HBOT protocols and their outcomes across the studies. Five RCTs enrolling 91 and 89 patients in FM and control groups were included in the present study. HBOT results in decreased tender points (-6.23 (95 % CI: -7.76, -4.71) P < 0.0001), increased pain threshold (0.57 (95% CI: 0.3, 0.83) P < 0.00001) and a decreased Visual Analog scale (VAS) score for pain (-5.31(95 % CI: -8.17, -2.45)). Quality of life, sleep, functional impairment, etc., also improved after HBOT. HBOT is effective in pain and other associated outcomes in FM patients. In FM patients, high-quality evidence in favour of HBOT to improve pain, fatigue, quality of life, sleep, psychological outcomes, etc., is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_102_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_102_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高压氧疗法(HBOT)是一种治疗慢性疼痛的辅助疗法。本研究旨在对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评估和荟萃分析,以评估高压氧疗法与传统疗法相比在减轻纤维肌痛(FM)患者疼痛方面的临床疗效和安全性。我们使用电子数据库对与纤维肌痛患者 HBOT 相关的医学主题词和关键词进行了系统检索:MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Scopus。我们还对谷歌学术进行了梳理,以发现可能未被收录的可用研究。我们还通过人工方式在已确定的原始文章或综述的参考文献列表中搜索相关文章。我们在 http://www.clinicaltrial.gov 上检查了所有正在进行/计划进行的研究方案。Cochrane 协作工具以及 Higgins 和 Thompson 的 I2 方法确定了偏倚和异质性风险。主要结果是 HBOT 对疼痛的影响;次要结果包括 HBOT 的不良反应、生活质量评估、功能障碍、心理症状和睡眠质量。证据的总体质量采用 GRADE 方法进行评估。数据分析采用 Cochrane RevMan 软件(5.4 版)。我们对每项研究的特点和结果进行了综合总结。我们还分析了各项研究中不同的 HBOT 方案及其结果。本研究共纳入了五项研究,FM 组和对照组分别有 91 和 89 名患者参加。HBOT 可减少压痛点(-6.23 (95 % CI: -7.76, -4.71) P < 0.0001),提高疼痛阈值(0.57 (95 % CI: 0.3, 0.83) P < 0.00001),减少疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(-5.31(95 % CI: -8.17, -2.45))。经 HBOT 治疗后,患者的生活质量、睡眠、功能障碍等也有所改善。HBOT 对 FM 患者的疼痛和其他相关症状有效。对于 FM 患者,需要高质量的证据来证明 HBOT 可改善疼痛、疲劳、生活质量、睡眠、心理结果等。
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Pain in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Studies
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive treatment for chronic pain. The current study aimed to perform a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of HBOT for pain reduction in fibromyalgia (FM) patients compared to conventional therapy. A systematic search of medical subject headings and keywords associated with HBOT for FM patients was conducted using electronic databases: MEDLINE/ PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Google Scholar was also combed to detect likely non-indexed available studies. We also searched manually through reference lists of identified original articles or reviews for relevant articles. The http://www.clinicaltrial.gov was examined for all research protocols being conducted/ planned. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and Higgins and Thompson’s I2 method determined the risk of bias and heterogeneity. The primary outcome was the effect of HBOT on pain; secondary outcomes included adverse effects of HBOT, assessment of the quality of life, functional impairment, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality. The overall quality of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Cochrane RevMan software (version 5.4) was used for data analysis. Results were synthesised through a general summary of the characteristics and findings of each study. We also analysed different HBOT protocols and their outcomes across the studies. Five RCTs enrolling 91 and 89 patients in FM and control groups were included in the present study. HBOT results in decreased tender points (-6.23 (95 % CI: -7.76, -4.71) P < 0.0001), increased pain threshold (0.57 (95% CI: 0.3, 0.83) P < 0.00001) and a decreased Visual Analog scale (VAS) score for pain (-5.31(95 % CI: -8.17, -2.45)). Quality of life, sleep, functional impairment, etc., also improved after HBOT. HBOT is effective in pain and other associated outcomes in FM patients. In FM patients, high-quality evidence in favour of HBOT to improve pain, fatigue, quality of life, sleep, psychological outcomes, etc., is required.