Anitha Livingstone, A. Bhadoria, David Pontin, Vartika Saxena, Michelle Thomas, Aprajita Mehta, Carolyn Wallace
{"title":"公共卫生专业学生对使用互动方法教授定性研究的评价","authors":"Anitha Livingstone, A. Bhadoria, David Pontin, Vartika Saxena, Michelle Thomas, Aprajita Mehta, Carolyn Wallace","doi":"10.4103/jme.jme_124_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Interactive teaching methods aid post graduate students in learning qualitative research. Four academic researchers from the United Kingdom had an opportunity to teach qualitative research methods, specifically consensus methods, to the Master of Public Health students (MPH) during a visit to India. This teaching formed part of a work package with All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, India exploring the concept of family resilience among families with children under 6 years.\n \n \n \n To use the experiences of the MPH students to gain knowledge and create meaning about using the consensus methods.\n \n \n \n The participants were the MPH students.\n \n \n \n We used the workshop method to introduce the concept of family resilience by using the question, ‘What will be the three top public health priorities in India to support family resilience in the 21st century?’ as a central theme for all the workshops. Furthermore, we introduced qualitative research methods and hands on experience of consensus methods to the students. The students were introduced to Delphi and Group Concept Mapping (GCM) methods during workshop 1. Workshop 2 introduced Nominal Group Technique (NGT) through a short presentation followed by a practical hands on session using GCM data from workshop 1. The last workshop (3) focused on the World Café method.\n \n \n \n The students evaluated the workshops highly and asked for online sessions on GCM, NGT, and World Café which will be planned in the future.\n \n \n \n We concluded that the post graduate curriculum for master’s in public health studies would benefit from teaching using interactive research methods which will enhance their critical thinking and autonomy. Second, although the MPH curriculum had quantitative methods in place, introducing qualitative consensus methods will open new avenues into future research. Finally, teaching using practical demonstration gives students a voice and makes learning effective and enjoyable.\n","PeriodicalId":251651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Evidence","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Health Student Evaluation of Teaching Qualitative Research Using Interactive Methods\",\"authors\":\"Anitha Livingstone, A. Bhadoria, David Pontin, Vartika Saxena, Michelle Thomas, Aprajita Mehta, Carolyn Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jme.jme_124_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Interactive teaching methods aid post graduate students in learning qualitative research. Four academic researchers from the United Kingdom had an opportunity to teach qualitative research methods, specifically consensus methods, to the Master of Public Health students (MPH) during a visit to India. This teaching formed part of a work package with All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, India exploring the concept of family resilience among families with children under 6 years.\\n \\n \\n \\n To use the experiences of the MPH students to gain knowledge and create meaning about using the consensus methods.\\n \\n \\n \\n The participants were the MPH students.\\n \\n \\n \\n We used the workshop method to introduce the concept of family resilience by using the question, ‘What will be the three top public health priorities in India to support family resilience in the 21st century?’ as a central theme for all the workshops. Furthermore, we introduced qualitative research methods and hands on experience of consensus methods to the students. The students were introduced to Delphi and Group Concept Mapping (GCM) methods during workshop 1. Workshop 2 introduced Nominal Group Technique (NGT) through a short presentation followed by a practical hands on session using GCM data from workshop 1. The last workshop (3) focused on the World Café method.\\n \\n \\n \\n The students evaluated the workshops highly and asked for online sessions on GCM, NGT, and World Café which will be planned in the future.\\n \\n \\n \\n We concluded that the post graduate curriculum for master’s in public health studies would benefit from teaching using interactive research methods which will enhance their critical thinking and autonomy. Second, although the MPH curriculum had quantitative methods in place, introducing qualitative consensus methods will open new avenues into future research. Finally, teaching using practical demonstration gives students a voice and makes learning effective and enjoyable.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":251651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_124_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_124_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
互动教学法帮助研究生学习定性研究。四名来自英国的学术研究人员在访问印度期间,有机会向公共卫生硕士(MPH)学生传授定性研究方法,特别是共识方法。此次教学是与印度全印度医学科学研究所(All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh)合作开展的一揽子工作的一部分,目的是在有 6 岁以下儿童的家庭中探索家庭复原力的概念。 利用公共卫生硕士学生的经验来获取知识,并创造使用共识方法的意义。 参与者为公共卫生硕士学生。 我们采用工作坊的方法,以 "21 世纪印度支持家庭复原力的三大公共卫生优先事项是什么 "作为所有工作坊的中心主题,介绍家庭复原力的概念。此外,我们还向学生们介绍了定性研究方法和共识方法的实践经验。讲习班 1 向学生们介绍了德尔菲法和小组概念绘图法(GCM)。工作坊 2 通过简短的演示介绍了名义小组技术 (NGT),随后利用工作坊 1 中的 GCM 数据进行了实际操作。最后一个工作坊(3)重点介绍了世界咖啡馆(World Café)方法。 学生们对工作坊给予了高度评价,并要求今后计划举办有关 GCM、NGT 和世界咖啡馆的在线课程。 我们的结论是,公共卫生硕士研究生课程将受益于使用互动研究方法的教学,这将提高他们的批判性思维和自主性。其次,尽管公共卫生硕士研究生课程已采用定量方法,但引入定性共识方法将为未来的研究开辟新的途径。最后,使用实践示范教学能让学生有发言权,使学习变得有效和愉快。
Public Health Student Evaluation of Teaching Qualitative Research Using Interactive Methods
Interactive teaching methods aid post graduate students in learning qualitative research. Four academic researchers from the United Kingdom had an opportunity to teach qualitative research methods, specifically consensus methods, to the Master of Public Health students (MPH) during a visit to India. This teaching formed part of a work package with All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, India exploring the concept of family resilience among families with children under 6 years.
To use the experiences of the MPH students to gain knowledge and create meaning about using the consensus methods.
The participants were the MPH students.
We used the workshop method to introduce the concept of family resilience by using the question, ‘What will be the three top public health priorities in India to support family resilience in the 21st century?’ as a central theme for all the workshops. Furthermore, we introduced qualitative research methods and hands on experience of consensus methods to the students. The students were introduced to Delphi and Group Concept Mapping (GCM) methods during workshop 1. Workshop 2 introduced Nominal Group Technique (NGT) through a short presentation followed by a practical hands on session using GCM data from workshop 1. The last workshop (3) focused on the World Café method.
The students evaluated the workshops highly and asked for online sessions on GCM, NGT, and World Café which will be planned in the future.
We concluded that the post graduate curriculum for master’s in public health studies would benefit from teaching using interactive research methods which will enhance their critical thinking and autonomy. Second, although the MPH curriculum had quantitative methods in place, introducing qualitative consensus methods will open new avenues into future research. Finally, teaching using practical demonstration gives students a voice and makes learning effective and enjoyable.