"睡眠数据看起来比我感觉好得多"。对睡眠追踪的自述和衍射解读

A. N. Nagele, Julian Hough
{"title":"\"睡眠数据看起来比我感觉好得多\"。对睡眠追踪的自述和衍射解读","authors":"A. N. Nagele, Julian Hough","doi":"10.3389/fcomp.2024.1258289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sleep-tracking products are promising their users an improvement to their sleep by focusing on behavior change but often neglecting the contextual and individual factors contributing to sleep quality and quantity. Making good sleep for productive scheduling a personal responsibility does not necessarily lead to better sleep and may cause stress and anxiety. In an autoethnographic study, the first author of this paper tracked her sleep for one month using a diary, body maps and an Oura ring and compared her subjectively felt sleep experience with the data produced by the Oura app. A thematic analysis of the data resulted in four themes describing the relationship between the user-researcher and her wearable sleep-tracker: (1) good sleep scores are motivating, (2) experience that matches the data leads to sense-making, (3) contradictory information from the app leads to frustration, and (4) the sleep-tracker competes with other social agents. A diffractive reading of the data and research process, following Karen Barad's methodology, resulted in a discussion of how data passes through the analog and digital apparatus and what contextual factors are left out but still significantly impact sleep quality and quantity. We add to a canon of sleep research recommending a move away from representing sleep in terms of comparison and competition, uncoupling it from neoliberal capitalistic productivity and self-improvement narratives which are often key contributing factors to bad sleep in the first place.","PeriodicalId":510141,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computer Science","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The sleep data looks way better than I feel.” An autoethnographic account and diffractive reading of sleep-tracking\",\"authors\":\"A. N. Nagele, Julian Hough\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcomp.2024.1258289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sleep-tracking products are promising their users an improvement to their sleep by focusing on behavior change but often neglecting the contextual and individual factors contributing to sleep quality and quantity. Making good sleep for productive scheduling a personal responsibility does not necessarily lead to better sleep and may cause stress and anxiety. In an autoethnographic study, the first author of this paper tracked her sleep for one month using a diary, body maps and an Oura ring and compared her subjectively felt sleep experience with the data produced by the Oura app. A thematic analysis of the data resulted in four themes describing the relationship between the user-researcher and her wearable sleep-tracker: (1) good sleep scores are motivating, (2) experience that matches the data leads to sense-making, (3) contradictory information from the app leads to frustration, and (4) the sleep-tracker competes with other social agents. A diffractive reading of the data and research process, following Karen Barad's methodology, resulted in a discussion of how data passes through the analog and digital apparatus and what contextual factors are left out but still significantly impact sleep quality and quantity. We add to a canon of sleep research recommending a move away from representing sleep in terms of comparison and competition, uncoupling it from neoliberal capitalistic productivity and self-improvement narratives which are often key contributing factors to bad sleep in the first place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1258289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1258289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睡眠跟踪产品向用户承诺改善睡眠,但往往忽视了影响睡眠质量和数量的环境因素和个人因素。将良好的睡眠作为提高工作效率的个人责任并不一定会带来更好的睡眠,反而可能会造成压力和焦虑。在一项自述式研究中,本文第一作者使用日记、身体地图和 Oura 戒指对自己的睡眠情况进行了为期一个月的跟踪,并将自己主观感受到的睡眠体验与 Oura 应用程序生成的数据进行了比较。通过对数据进行主题分析,得出了描述用户研究者与可穿戴睡眠追踪器之间关系的四个主题:(1) 好的睡眠分数是动力,(2) 与数据相匹配的体验导致感性认识,(3) 来自应用程序的矛盾信息导致挫败感,(4) 睡眠追踪器与其他社会代理竞争。按照凯伦-巴拉德(Karen Barad)的方法论,我们对数据和研究过程进行了衍射式解读,讨论了数据如何通过模拟和数字设备,以及哪些背景因素被忽略但仍对睡眠质量和数量产生重大影响。我们为睡眠研究的经典之作添砖加瓦,建议摒弃用比较和竞争来描述睡眠的做法,将其与新自由主义资本主义生产力和自我完善叙事分离开来,这些叙事往往是导致睡眠质量低下的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“The sleep data looks way better than I feel.” An autoethnographic account and diffractive reading of sleep-tracking
Sleep-tracking products are promising their users an improvement to their sleep by focusing on behavior change but often neglecting the contextual and individual factors contributing to sleep quality and quantity. Making good sleep for productive scheduling a personal responsibility does not necessarily lead to better sleep and may cause stress and anxiety. In an autoethnographic study, the first author of this paper tracked her sleep for one month using a diary, body maps and an Oura ring and compared her subjectively felt sleep experience with the data produced by the Oura app. A thematic analysis of the data resulted in four themes describing the relationship between the user-researcher and her wearable sleep-tracker: (1) good sleep scores are motivating, (2) experience that matches the data leads to sense-making, (3) contradictory information from the app leads to frustration, and (4) the sleep-tracker competes with other social agents. A diffractive reading of the data and research process, following Karen Barad's methodology, resulted in a discussion of how data passes through the analog and digital apparatus and what contextual factors are left out but still significantly impact sleep quality and quantity. We add to a canon of sleep research recommending a move away from representing sleep in terms of comparison and competition, uncoupling it from neoliberal capitalistic productivity and self-improvement narratives which are often key contributing factors to bad sleep in the first place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity for Industry 5.0: trends and gaps Device-enabled neighborhood-slot allocation for the edge-oriented Internet of Things High-quality implementation for a continuous-in-time financial API in C# Editorial: HCI and worker well-being Extracting typing game keystroke patterns as potential indicators of programming aptitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1