José Dorenbos, África López Zabalegui, Luna Njoku Dominguez
{"title":"超越太空新世界:奥克塔维亚-巴特勒和亚当-加内特-琼斯的批判性星际边界","authors":"José Dorenbos, África López Zabalegui, Luna Njoku Dominguez","doi":"10.33391/jgjh.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores two contemporary literary visions of space settlement to gauge their potential within an emancipatory feminist and antiracist imaginary of the future. In doing so, it engages with the broader question of whether literary interplanetary dreams are necessarily tied up in a colonial rhetoric of violent expansion, or if they can also be organized to serve the interests of oppressed and underserved groups in an Anthropocene context.\nThe text examines and compares two recent narratives of space settlement, the one found in Octavia Butler’s ‘Earthseed’ series and Adam Garnet Jones’ short story ‘History of the New World.’ Based on a comparative close reading of both, this paper argues that both stories frame the project of resettling in space as a hopeful alternative to life within a collapsed natural world and the precarious socio-political framework that has arisen from it, albeit with distinctly different outcomes. This comparison focuses specifically on the organization of such utopian extraplanetary societies and the roles they fulfill in the present. Crucially, this paper considers how both stories evaluate the possibility of choosing not to leave for the astral frontier.","PeriodicalId":115950,"journal":{"name":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","volume":"104 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond A New World in Space: Critical Astral Frontiers in Octavia Butler and Adam Garnet Jones\",\"authors\":\"José Dorenbos, África López Zabalegui, Luna Njoku Dominguez\",\"doi\":\"10.33391/jgjh.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores two contemporary literary visions of space settlement to gauge their potential within an emancipatory feminist and antiracist imaginary of the future. In doing so, it engages with the broader question of whether literary interplanetary dreams are necessarily tied up in a colonial rhetoric of violent expansion, or if they can also be organized to serve the interests of oppressed and underserved groups in an Anthropocene context.\\nThe text examines and compares two recent narratives of space settlement, the one found in Octavia Butler’s ‘Earthseed’ series and Adam Garnet Jones’ short story ‘History of the New World.’ Based on a comparative close reading of both, this paper argues that both stories frame the project of resettling in space as a hopeful alternative to life within a collapsed natural world and the precarious socio-political framework that has arisen from it, albeit with distinctly different outcomes. This comparison focuses specifically on the organization of such utopian extraplanetary societies and the roles they fulfill in the present. Crucially, this paper considers how both stories evaluate the possibility of choosing not to leave for the astral frontier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33391/jgjh.179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33391/jgjh.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了当代文学对太空定居的两种设想,以衡量它们在解放女权主义者和反种族主义者的未来想象中的潜力。在此过程中,本文探讨了一个更广泛的问题,即文学中的星际梦想是否必然与暴力扩张的殖民主义修辞相联系,或者它们是否也可以被组织起来,在人类世背景下服务于受压迫和得不到充分服务的群体的利益。本文研究并比较了最近的两种太空定居叙事,即奥克塔维亚-巴特勒(Octavia Butler)的《地球种子》(Earthseed)系列和亚当-加内特-琼斯(Adam Garnet Jones)的短篇小说《新世界的历史》(History of the New World)中的太空定居叙事。通过对这两部作品的比较细读,本文认为,这两部作品都将太空定居计划描绘成一种充满希望的替代方案,以取代在崩溃的自然世界中的生活以及由此产生的不稳定的社会政治框架,尽管结果截然不同。本文的比较特别关注这种乌托邦式的星外社会的组织及其在当下所扮演的角色。最重要的是,本文考虑了这两个故事如何评价选择不离开星际边界的可能性。
Beyond A New World in Space: Critical Astral Frontiers in Octavia Butler and Adam Garnet Jones
This paper explores two contemporary literary visions of space settlement to gauge their potential within an emancipatory feminist and antiracist imaginary of the future. In doing so, it engages with the broader question of whether literary interplanetary dreams are necessarily tied up in a colonial rhetoric of violent expansion, or if they can also be organized to serve the interests of oppressed and underserved groups in an Anthropocene context.
The text examines and compares two recent narratives of space settlement, the one found in Octavia Butler’s ‘Earthseed’ series and Adam Garnet Jones’ short story ‘History of the New World.’ Based on a comparative close reading of both, this paper argues that both stories frame the project of resettling in space as a hopeful alternative to life within a collapsed natural world and the precarious socio-political framework that has arisen from it, albeit with distinctly different outcomes. This comparison focuses specifically on the organization of such utopian extraplanetary societies and the roles they fulfill in the present. Crucially, this paper considers how both stories evaluate the possibility of choosing not to leave for the astral frontier.