药剂师主导的干预措施对越南医生为门诊病人开处方的效果:干预前后的研究

Loc Phuoc Trinh, Quyen Nguyen Tu Le, Duong Bui Thuy Le, Duyen Quang Loc Vo, D. Q. Lam, Tam Thi Minh Nguyen, S. T. Pham, Thang Nguyen
{"title":"药剂师主导的干预措施对越南医生为门诊病人开处方的效果:干预前后的研究","authors":"Loc Phuoc Trinh, Quyen Nguyen Tu Le, Duong Bui Thuy Le, Duyen Quang Loc Vo, D. Q. Lam, Tam Thi Minh Nguyen, S. T. Pham, Thang Nguyen","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Drug-related problems (DRPs) can lead to treatment failures and high risks of hospitali-zation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led interventions on DRPs in outpa-tient prescribing and to determine the risk factors relative to these DRPs.Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted that compared before- (April 1 to June 30, 2020) and after- (June 1 to June 15, 2021) interventions on the outpatient prescribing process from a public hospital in Vietnam. The PCNE classification version 9.1 and suitable drug information were used to determine DRPs, which then used Drugs.com to find drug-drug interactions for each prescription. Collaborated with hospital pharmacists via reporting on the pre-intervention results, sending information sheets, and reminding doctors of the DRPs was conducted.Results: 32.8% of prescriptions had at least 1 DRP in 500 pre-intervention prescriptions. In 500 post-intervention prescriptions, the proportion of at least 1 DRP prescription decreased from 32.8% to 31.0% (p-value>0.05). Prescriptions with ≥5 drugs increased the possibility of a DRP appearance (p-value<0.001).Conclusion: This intervention method was not thorough, so it was ineffective in reducing DRPs on outpatient prescriptions. It is necessary to conduct specific interventions on each DRP and more time to discuss with doctors to improve the effectiveness of prescribing.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":"52 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Intervention on Physicians Prescribing for Outpatients in Vietnam: A Before- and After-intervention Study\",\"authors\":\"Loc Phuoc Trinh, Quyen Nguyen Tu Le, Duong Bui Thuy Le, Duyen Quang Loc Vo, D. Q. Lam, Tam Thi Minh Nguyen, S. T. Pham, Thang Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.20241038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Drug-related problems (DRPs) can lead to treatment failures and high risks of hospitali-zation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led interventions on DRPs in outpa-tient prescribing and to determine the risk factors relative to these DRPs.Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted that compared before- (April 1 to June 30, 2020) and after- (June 1 to June 15, 2021) interventions on the outpatient prescribing process from a public hospital in Vietnam. The PCNE classification version 9.1 and suitable drug information were used to determine DRPs, which then used Drugs.com to find drug-drug interactions for each prescription. Collaborated with hospital pharmacists via reporting on the pre-intervention results, sending information sheets, and reminding doctors of the DRPs was conducted.Results: 32.8% of prescriptions had at least 1 DRP in 500 pre-intervention prescriptions. In 500 post-intervention prescriptions, the proportion of at least 1 DRP prescription decreased from 32.8% to 31.0% (p-value>0.05). Prescriptions with ≥5 drugs increased the possibility of a DRP appearance (p-value<0.001).Conclusion: This intervention method was not thorough, so it was ineffective in reducing DRPs on outpatient prescriptions. It is necessary to conduct specific interventions on each DRP and more time to discuss with doctors to improve the effectiveness of prescribing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:药物相关问题(DRPs)可导致治疗失败和高住院风险。本研究旨在评估药剂师主导的干预措施对门诊处方中药物相关问题的影响,并确定与这些药物相关问题有关的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究比较了越南一家公立医院门诊处方过程中干预前(2020 年 4 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日)和干预后(2021 年 6 月 1 日至 6 月 15 日)的情况。使用 PCNE 分类 9.1 版和合适的药物信息确定 DRP,然后使用 Drugs.com 查找每个处方的药物相互作用。通过报告干预前的结果、发送信息单和提醒医生注意 DRPs,与医院药剂师开展合作:结果:在干预前的 500 份处方中,32.8% 的处方至少有 1 个 DRP。在干预后的 500 份处方中,至少有 1 份 DRP 的处方比例从 32.8%降至 31.0%(P 值>0.05)。≥5种药物的处方增加了出现DRP的可能性(P值<0.001):这种干预方法并不彻底,因此无法有效减少门诊处方中的 DRP。有必要对每种 DRP 进行具体干预,并花更多时间与医生讨论,以提高处方的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Intervention on Physicians Prescribing for Outpatients in Vietnam: A Before- and After-intervention Study
Objective: Drug-related problems (DRPs) can lead to treatment failures and high risks of hospitali-zation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led interventions on DRPs in outpa-tient prescribing and to determine the risk factors relative to these DRPs.Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted that compared before- (April 1 to June 30, 2020) and after- (June 1 to June 15, 2021) interventions on the outpatient prescribing process from a public hospital in Vietnam. The PCNE classification version 9.1 and suitable drug information were used to determine DRPs, which then used Drugs.com to find drug-drug interactions for each prescription. Collaborated with hospital pharmacists via reporting on the pre-intervention results, sending information sheets, and reminding doctors of the DRPs was conducted.Results: 32.8% of prescriptions had at least 1 DRP in 500 pre-intervention prescriptions. In 500 post-intervention prescriptions, the proportion of at least 1 DRP prescription decreased from 32.8% to 31.0% (p-value>0.05). Prescriptions with ≥5 drugs increased the possibility of a DRP appearance (p-value<0.001).Conclusion: This intervention method was not thorough, so it was ineffective in reducing DRPs on outpatient prescriptions. It is necessary to conduct specific interventions on each DRP and more time to discuss with doctors to improve the effectiveness of prescribing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1