绘制健康之路文献:范围界定审查协议

A. McGlynn, Éidín Ní Shé, Teng Liaw, Tony Jackson, Ben Harris-Roxas
{"title":"绘制健康之路文献:范围界定审查协议","authors":"A. McGlynn, Éidín Ní Shé, Teng Liaw, Tony Jackson, Ben Harris-Roxas","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13737.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This scoping review will identify what literature exists on HealthPathways and make suggestions for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Background: HealthPathways is a free to access, password protected online tool containing practical, easy to use, localised clinical and referral information that is primarily aimed at GPs. HealthPathways originated in Canterbury, New Zealand in 2008. Since this time the program has spread and is being used in 50 health systems across New Zealand, Australia, and the United Kingdom (Streamliners, 2022a). Despite such large spread of the program there has been relatively little literature published on the utility, usefulness and cost-effectiveness of HealthPathways. This scoping review aims to identify and describe all current HealthPathways literature and make recommendations for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology will be used to develop the scoping review. Databases included in the search include MEDLINE (PubMEd), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emerald and Cochrane. The inclusion criteria are studies and grey literature on HealthPathways that are published in English, with no time limit. Grey literature will be identified through searching relevant credible organisations and websites. All results will be entered into Covidence to be assessed by two reviewers against a set tool. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews will be used for reporting. Ethics approval is not required as only published information will be used. The research will be disseminated through publication in an open access peer reviewed journal. Conclusions: This protocol is published to make the process for the review transparent and replicable. The scoping review will highlight the extent of evidence that exists on HealthPathways and may provide direction for decision making and future research.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"256 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the HealthPathways literature: a scoping review protocol\",\"authors\":\"A. McGlynn, Éidín Ní Shé, Teng Liaw, Tony Jackson, Ben Harris-Roxas\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13737.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This scoping review will identify what literature exists on HealthPathways and make suggestions for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Background: HealthPathways is a free to access, password protected online tool containing practical, easy to use, localised clinical and referral information that is primarily aimed at GPs. HealthPathways originated in Canterbury, New Zealand in 2008. Since this time the program has spread and is being used in 50 health systems across New Zealand, Australia, and the United Kingdom (Streamliners, 2022a). Despite such large spread of the program there has been relatively little literature published on the utility, usefulness and cost-effectiveness of HealthPathways. This scoping review aims to identify and describe all current HealthPathways literature and make recommendations for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology will be used to develop the scoping review. Databases included in the search include MEDLINE (PubMEd), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emerald and Cochrane. The inclusion criteria are studies and grey literature on HealthPathways that are published in English, with no time limit. Grey literature will be identified through searching relevant credible organisations and websites. All results will be entered into Covidence to be assessed by two reviewers against a set tool. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews will be used for reporting. Ethics approval is not required as only published information will be used. The research will be disseminated through publication in an open access peer reviewed journal. Conclusions: This protocol is published to make the process for the review transparent and replicable. The scoping review will highlight the extent of evidence that exists on HealthPathways and may provide direction for decision making and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"256 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13737.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13737.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:本范围综述将确定现有的健康之路文献,并就未来健康之路研究的方向提出建议。背景介绍健康之路(HealthPathways)是一个免费访问、密码保护的在线工具,包含实用、易用、本地化的临床和转诊信息,主要面向全科医生。HealthPathways 于 2008 年起源于新西兰坎特伯雷。从那时起,该程序就开始推广,目前已在新西兰、澳大利亚和英国的 50 个医疗系统中使用(Streamliners,2022a)。尽管该计划得到了如此广泛的推广,但有关 HealthPathways 的实用性、有用性和成本效益的文献却相对较少。本范围综述旨在识别和描述目前所有的健康之路文献,并对未来健康之路的研究方向提出建议。研究方法:将采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所 (Joanna Briggs Institute, JBI) 的方法进行范围界定综述。检索数据库包括 MEDLINE (PubMEd)、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Google Scholar、Emerald 和 Cochrane。纳入标准是以英文发表的有关 HealthPathways 的研究和灰色文献,没有时间限制。灰色文献将通过搜索相关可信组织和网站来确定。所有结果都将输入 Covidence,由两名审稿人根据设定的工具进行评估。在报告时,将使用用于范围界定审查的 PRISMA 扩展工具。由于只使用已公布的信息,因此不需要伦理审批。研究成果将通过在公开的同行评审期刊上发表的方式进行传播。结论:发布本协议是为了使审查过程透明化并具有可复制性。范围界定审查将强调健康之路现有证据的范围,并为决策和未来研究提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping the HealthPathways literature: a scoping review protocol
Objective: This scoping review will identify what literature exists on HealthPathways and make suggestions for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Background: HealthPathways is a free to access, password protected online tool containing practical, easy to use, localised clinical and referral information that is primarily aimed at GPs. HealthPathways originated in Canterbury, New Zealand in 2008. Since this time the program has spread and is being used in 50 health systems across New Zealand, Australia, and the United Kingdom (Streamliners, 2022a). Despite such large spread of the program there has been relatively little literature published on the utility, usefulness and cost-effectiveness of HealthPathways. This scoping review aims to identify and describe all current HealthPathways literature and make recommendations for the direction of future HealthPathways research. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology will be used to develop the scoping review. Databases included in the search include MEDLINE (PubMEd), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emerald and Cochrane. The inclusion criteria are studies and grey literature on HealthPathways that are published in English, with no time limit. Grey literature will be identified through searching relevant credible organisations and websites. All results will be entered into Covidence to be assessed by two reviewers against a set tool. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews will be used for reporting. Ethics approval is not required as only published information will be used. The research will be disseminated through publication in an open access peer reviewed journal. Conclusions: This protocol is published to make the process for the review transparent and replicable. The scoping review will highlight the extent of evidence that exists on HealthPathways and may provide direction for decision making and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
A study to explore the role of a low threshold, fitness focussed physical rehabilitation intervention with protein supplementation to target physical function and frailty in people with problematic substance use and homelessness: protocol for a single-arm pre-post intervention study. Protocol for a systematic search and critical discourse analysis of research on national HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programmes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Development and Initial Implementation of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy in a Non-regulated Trial: a research note from the ReStOre II Trial. The emerging role of a Stroke Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) in Early Supported Discharged: Developing a pathway for stroke nursing for secondary prevention in the community.  A scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1