将 CD64 和 I/T 比值作为班加罗尔马辛新生儿败血症的诊断测试方法

Dewi Indah Noviana Pratiwi, P. W. Nurikhwan, Muhammad Naufal Firdaus
{"title":"将 CD64 和 I/T 比值作为班加罗尔马辛新生儿败血症的诊断测试方法","authors":"Dewi Indah Noviana Pratiwi, P. W. Nurikhwan, Muhammad Naufal Firdaus","doi":"10.24293/ijcpml.v30i2.2077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonatal sepsis remains a major problem in the service and care of neonates. The clinical features of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, which makes it difficult to diagnose. The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical use of cluster of differentiation 64 as a diagnostic marker of neonatal infection. This research used an analytical observational study. The research subjects consisted of 43 samples of neonates at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin who had met the inclusion criteria. The results of the study concluded that there was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital with p=0.874 for the I/T ratio and p=0.285 for cluster of differentiation 64. The diagnostic test for the I/T ratio with a cut-off of 0.2 showed a sensitivity of 23.8%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 45.5%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 0.16, and median of 0.11. The results of the cluster of differentiation 64 diagnostic test with a cut-off of 2025 showed a sensitivity of 42.9%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 81.8%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 2487.93, and median of 1671. There was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin.\n ","PeriodicalId":354500,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","volume":"145 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD64 and I/T Ratio as a Diagnostic Test on Neonatal Sepsis in Banjarmasin\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Indah Noviana Pratiwi, P. W. Nurikhwan, Muhammad Naufal Firdaus\",\"doi\":\"10.24293/ijcpml.v30i2.2077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neonatal sepsis remains a major problem in the service and care of neonates. The clinical features of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, which makes it difficult to diagnose. The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical use of cluster of differentiation 64 as a diagnostic marker of neonatal infection. This research used an analytical observational study. The research subjects consisted of 43 samples of neonates at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin who had met the inclusion criteria. The results of the study concluded that there was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital with p=0.874 for the I/T ratio and p=0.285 for cluster of differentiation 64. The diagnostic test for the I/T ratio with a cut-off of 0.2 showed a sensitivity of 23.8%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 45.5%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 0.16, and median of 0.11. The results of the cluster of differentiation 64 diagnostic test with a cut-off of 2025 showed a sensitivity of 42.9%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 81.8%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 2487.93, and median of 1671. There was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":354500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"volume\":\"145 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v30i2.2077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v30i2.2077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿败血症仍然是新生儿服务和护理中的一个主要问题。新生儿败血症的临床特征不具特异性,因此难以诊断。本研究的主要目的是评估分化群 64 作为新生儿感染诊断标志物的临床应用。本研究采用分析观察法。研究对象包括班贾马辛乌林医院符合纳入标准的 43 个新生儿样本。研究结果表明,在乌林医院,疑似新生儿败血症患者的 I/T 比值和分化群 64 值与金标准降钙素原和/或血液培养之间没有显著差异,I/T 比值的 p=0.874 和分化群 64 的 p=0.285。以 0.2 为临界值的 I/T 比值诊断测试显示,敏感性为 23.8%,特异性为 72.7%,阳性预测值为 45.5%,阴性预测值为 50%,平均值为 0.16,中位数为 0.11。以 2025 为分界点的 64 分化群诊断检测结果显示,灵敏度为 42.9%,特异性为 72.7%,阳性预测值为 81.8%,阴性预测值为 50%,平均值为 2487.93,中位数为 1671。在班贾马辛乌林医院,疑似新生儿败血症患者的 I/T 比值和分化群 64 值与金标准降钙素原和/或血液培养值之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CD64 and I/T Ratio as a Diagnostic Test on Neonatal Sepsis in Banjarmasin
Neonatal sepsis remains a major problem in the service and care of neonates. The clinical features of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, which makes it difficult to diagnose. The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical use of cluster of differentiation 64 as a diagnostic marker of neonatal infection. This research used an analytical observational study. The research subjects consisted of 43 samples of neonates at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin who had met the inclusion criteria. The results of the study concluded that there was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital with p=0.874 for the I/T ratio and p=0.285 for cluster of differentiation 64. The diagnostic test for the I/T ratio with a cut-off of 0.2 showed a sensitivity of 23.8%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 45.5%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 0.16, and median of 0.11. The results of the cluster of differentiation 64 diagnostic test with a cut-off of 2025 showed a sensitivity of 42.9%, specificity of 72.7%, positive predictive value of 81.8%, negative predictive value of 50%, mean of 2487.93, and median of 1671. There was no significant difference between the I/T ratio and cluster of differentiation 64 values in patients with suspected neonatal sepsis with the gold standard procalcitonin and/or blood culture at Ulin Hospital, Banjarmasin.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Lateral-flow Nanoparticle Fluorescence Assay and ELISA Method for Interferon-y Release Assay Test Correlation between VCAM-1 Level and Absolute Monocyte Count in Coronary Artery Disease Performance Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio Using Meditape UC-11A Strip Test Risk Factors of Fungal Growth in Sputum Culture from Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients Analysis of Albumin to Globulin Ratio as A Prognostic Predictor in Lupus Nephritis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1