对梅尼埃病患者前庭和听力损失的抑制性抛头范例(SHIMP)和视频抛头试验(vHIT)进行评估

Arzu Kirbaç, Serpil Alluşoğlu, Armağan İncesu, Hülya Özen, Ercan Kaya, M. Pınarbaşlı
{"title":"对梅尼埃病患者前庭和听力损失的抑制性抛头范例(SHIMP)和视频抛头试验(vHIT)进行评估","authors":"Arzu Kirbaç, Serpil Alluşoğlu, Armağan İncesu, Hülya Özen, Ercan Kaya, M. Pınarbaşlı","doi":"10.20515/otd.1373302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the results of the video head impulse test (vHIT), and suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) in adult diagnosed with definite Meniere’s disease (MD). This study was conducted with 20 patients aged 18-45 years with canal paresis and sensorineural type hearing loss in symptomatic ears, who were diagnosed with unilateral definite MD. The subjects were assessed with conventional audiometry (0.125–8 kHz), the bithermal binaural air caloric test, vHIT, and SHIMP. The mean SHIMP vestibulo-ocular reflex (S-VOR) gain of the MD side was 0.69, and that of the healthy side was 0.77. The S-VOR gain values were statistically lower than the mean vHIT VOR gain (V-VOR) values on both sides (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the MD and healthy sides in terms of the anti-compensatory saccades (ACSs) latency and amplitude and S-VOR gain (p>0.05). In the MD group, the vHIT results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 50% (10/20 ears). On the healthy side, the vHIT results were abnormal in 10% (2/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears). In this study, the V-VOR and S-VOR gains, vHIT saccades, SHIMP saccade latency, and SHIMP saccade amplitude were not found to be beneficial parameters in differentiating affected and healthy ears in the patients with MD. In other words, contrary to expectations, vHIT and SHIMP tests were not sufficient to detect pathological involvement in Meniere's disease.","PeriodicalId":409662,"journal":{"name":"OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","volume":"367 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kanıtlanmış Vestibüler ve İşitme Kaybı olan Meniere Hastalarında Supresyon Baş Savurma Paradigması (SHIMP) ve Video Baş Savurma Testinin (vHIT) Değerlendirilmesi\",\"authors\":\"Arzu Kirbaç, Serpil Alluşoğlu, Armağan İncesu, Hülya Özen, Ercan Kaya, M. Pınarbaşlı\",\"doi\":\"10.20515/otd.1373302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to examine the results of the video head impulse test (vHIT), and suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) in adult diagnosed with definite Meniere’s disease (MD). This study was conducted with 20 patients aged 18-45 years with canal paresis and sensorineural type hearing loss in symptomatic ears, who were diagnosed with unilateral definite MD. The subjects were assessed with conventional audiometry (0.125–8 kHz), the bithermal binaural air caloric test, vHIT, and SHIMP. The mean SHIMP vestibulo-ocular reflex (S-VOR) gain of the MD side was 0.69, and that of the healthy side was 0.77. The S-VOR gain values were statistically lower than the mean vHIT VOR gain (V-VOR) values on both sides (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the MD and healthy sides in terms of the anti-compensatory saccades (ACSs) latency and amplitude and S-VOR gain (p>0.05). In the MD group, the vHIT results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 50% (10/20 ears). On the healthy side, the vHIT results were abnormal in 10% (2/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears). In this study, the V-VOR and S-VOR gains, vHIT saccades, SHIMP saccade latency, and SHIMP saccade amplitude were not found to be beneficial parameters in differentiating affected and healthy ears in the patients with MD. In other words, contrary to expectations, vHIT and SHIMP tests were not sufficient to detect pathological involvement in Meniere's disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\"367 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1373302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1373302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)和抑制头脉冲范式(SHIMP)在确诊为梅尼埃病(MD)的成人中的应用效果。这项研究的对象是 20 名年龄在 18-45 岁之间、患有耳道麻痹和感音神经型听力损失的无症状耳患者,他们被诊断为单侧明确梅尼埃病。受试者接受了常规测听(0.125-8 kHz)、双耳空气热量测试、vHIT 和 SHIMP 的评估。MD 侧的平均 SHIMP 前庭眼反射(S-VOR)增益为 0.69,健康侧为 0.77。在统计学上,两侧的 S-VOR 增益值均低于 vHIT VOR 增益(V-VOR)的平均值(P0.05)。在 MD 组中,35% 的耳朵(7/20 耳)vHIT 结果异常,50% 的耳朵(10/20 耳)SHIMP 结果异常。健康组中,10% 的耳朵(2/20 耳)vHIT 结果异常,35% 的耳朵(7/20 耳)SHIMP 结果异常。在这项研究中,V-VOR 和 S-VOR 增益、vHIT 囊转、SHIMP 囊转潜伏期和 SHIMP 囊转幅度均未被发现是区分 MD 患者患耳和健康耳的有益参数。换句话说,与预期相反,vHIT 和 SHIMP 测试不足以检测梅尼埃病的病理参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kanıtlanmış Vestibüler ve İşitme Kaybı olan Meniere Hastalarında Supresyon Baş Savurma Paradigması (SHIMP) ve Video Baş Savurma Testinin (vHIT) Değerlendirilmesi
This study aimed to examine the results of the video head impulse test (vHIT), and suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) in adult diagnosed with definite Meniere’s disease (MD). This study was conducted with 20 patients aged 18-45 years with canal paresis and sensorineural type hearing loss in symptomatic ears, who were diagnosed with unilateral definite MD. The subjects were assessed with conventional audiometry (0.125–8 kHz), the bithermal binaural air caloric test, vHIT, and SHIMP. The mean SHIMP vestibulo-ocular reflex (S-VOR) gain of the MD side was 0.69, and that of the healthy side was 0.77. The S-VOR gain values were statistically lower than the mean vHIT VOR gain (V-VOR) values on both sides (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the MD and healthy sides in terms of the anti-compensatory saccades (ACSs) latency and amplitude and S-VOR gain (p>0.05). In the MD group, the vHIT results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 50% (10/20 ears). On the healthy side, the vHIT results were abnormal in 10% (2/20 ears) of the ears, and the SHIMP results were abnormal in 35% (7/20 ears). In this study, the V-VOR and S-VOR gains, vHIT saccades, SHIMP saccade latency, and SHIMP saccade amplitude were not found to be beneficial parameters in differentiating affected and healthy ears in the patients with MD. In other words, contrary to expectations, vHIT and SHIMP tests were not sufficient to detect pathological involvement in Meniere's disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The health-related physical fitness of university female students with and without generalized joint hypermobility: A case-control study Çocuklarda Periferik Fasiyal Sinir Paralizisi ve Obezite: Tesadüften Fazlası mı? İnsülinin Sinaptik Plastisitedeki Rolü: Uzun Dönemli Baskılanma Warthin tumor: Assessment of association with salivary gland and non-salivary gland malignant tumors via clinicopathological and radiological data The Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Severe Gastrointestinal Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Children after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1