关于在风湿病学中使用远程医疗的德尔菲共识:RESULTAR 研究

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Reumatologia Clinica Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reuma.2024.01.005
Jenaro Graña Gil , María José Moreno Martínez , María del Carmen Carrasco Cubero
{"title":"关于在风湿病学中使用远程医疗的德尔菲共识:RESULTAR 研究","authors":"Jenaro Graña Gil ,&nbsp;María José Moreno Martínez ,&nbsp;María del Carmen Carrasco Cubero","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>There is growing interest in the potential of telemedicine (TM) as an alternative to physical consultation. Although numerous studies prove the benefits of TM in rheumatology, there are no recommendations on its implementation in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the application of TM in rheumatology consultations in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Qualitative, cross-sectional, multicenter study with Delphi methodology in 2 rounds of queries. A structured ad hoc questionnaire was designed that included statements on teleconsultation, nursing teleconsultation, telecare, telerehabilitation, teleradiology, telehealth tele-education, main barriers, advantages and disadvantages of telehealth tele-education and TM in rheumatoid arthritis. The participants were rheumatology specialists practicing in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participating rheumatologists (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->80) had a mean age of 42.4 (±<!--> <!-->9.0) years, with 12.6 (±<!--> <!-->8.4) years of experience. Some of the aspects of TM that obtained the greatest consensus were: TM is useful for follow-up of some patients, to help determine if a face-to-face consultation is necessary, or to assist patients with rheumatoid arthritis if they present low activity or in remission; certain patients, such as those in their first consultation or those who present digital barriers or cognitive deterioration, should be seen face-to-face; TM presents some technical and patient access barriers; TM can be useful in nursing and in continued medical education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TM can be beneficial for the treatment and follow-up of patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as for alleviating the face-to-face care burden in rheumatology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consenso Delphi sobre el uso de la telemedicina en reumatología: estudio RESULTAR\",\"authors\":\"Jenaro Graña Gil ,&nbsp;María José Moreno Martínez ,&nbsp;María del Carmen Carrasco Cubero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reuma.2024.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>There is growing interest in the potential of telemedicine (TM) as an alternative to physical consultation. Although numerous studies prove the benefits of TM in rheumatology, there are no recommendations on its implementation in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the application of TM in rheumatology consultations in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Qualitative, cross-sectional, multicenter study with Delphi methodology in 2 rounds of queries. A structured ad hoc questionnaire was designed that included statements on teleconsultation, nursing teleconsultation, telecare, telerehabilitation, teleradiology, telehealth tele-education, main barriers, advantages and disadvantages of telehealth tele-education and TM in rheumatoid arthritis. The participants were rheumatology specialists practicing in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participating rheumatologists (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->80) had a mean age of 42.4 (±<!--> <!-->9.0) years, with 12.6 (±<!--> <!-->8.4) years of experience. Some of the aspects of TM that obtained the greatest consensus were: TM is useful for follow-up of some patients, to help determine if a face-to-face consultation is necessary, or to assist patients with rheumatoid arthritis if they present low activity or in remission; certain patients, such as those in their first consultation or those who present digital barriers or cognitive deterioration, should be seen face-to-face; TM presents some technical and patient access barriers; TM can be useful in nursing and in continued medical education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TM can be beneficial for the treatment and follow-up of patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as for alleviating the face-to-face care burden in rheumatology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X24000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X24000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的远程医疗(TM)作为物理会诊的一种替代方式,其潜力正受到越来越多的关注。尽管大量研究证明了远程医疗在风湿病学中的益处,但在西班牙却没有实施远程医疗的建议。本研究旨在分析远程医疗在西班牙风湿病学会诊中的应用情况。材料和方法采用德尔菲法进行两轮询问的定性、横断面、多中心研究。设计了一份结构化的特别问卷,其中包括远程会诊、护理远程会诊、远程护理、远程康复、远程放射学、远程医疗远程教育、远程医疗远程教育的主要障碍、优缺点以及类风湿关节炎中的远程医疗。结果参与研究的风湿病专家(N = 80)平均年龄为 42.4(± 9.0)岁,拥有 12.6(± 8.4)年的工作经验。就 TM 的一些方面达成的最大共识是TM 对于一些患者的随访非常有用,有助于确定是否有必要进行面对面会诊,或者在类风湿性关节炎患者活动较少或病情缓解时为其提供帮助;某些患者,如初诊患者或存在数字障碍或认知能力衰退的患者,应进行面对面会诊;TM 在技术和患者使用方面存在一些障碍;TM 在护理和继续医学教育方面非常有用。结论 TM 有利于风湿病患者的治疗和随访,也有利于减轻风湿病学中面对面护理的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consenso Delphi sobre el uso de la telemedicina en reumatología: estudio RESULTAR

Background and objectives

There is growing interest in the potential of telemedicine (TM) as an alternative to physical consultation. Although numerous studies prove the benefits of TM in rheumatology, there are no recommendations on its implementation in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the application of TM in rheumatology consultations in Spain.

Materials and methods

Qualitative, cross-sectional, multicenter study with Delphi methodology in 2 rounds of queries. A structured ad hoc questionnaire was designed that included statements on teleconsultation, nursing teleconsultation, telecare, telerehabilitation, teleradiology, telehealth tele-education, main barriers, advantages and disadvantages of telehealth tele-education and TM in rheumatoid arthritis. The participants were rheumatology specialists practicing in Spain.

Results

The participating rheumatologists (N = 80) had a mean age of 42.4 (± 9.0) years, with 12.6 (± 8.4) years of experience. Some of the aspects of TM that obtained the greatest consensus were: TM is useful for follow-up of some patients, to help determine if a face-to-face consultation is necessary, or to assist patients with rheumatoid arthritis if they present low activity or in remission; certain patients, such as those in their first consultation or those who present digital barriers or cognitive deterioration, should be seen face-to-face; TM presents some technical and patient access barriers; TM can be useful in nursing and in continued medical education.

Conclusions

TM can be beneficial for the treatment and follow-up of patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as for alleviating the face-to-face care burden in rheumatology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Autoinmunidad en pacientes con errores innatos de la inmunidad: serie de casos Biomarcadores: cómo lograr su consolidación en práctica clínica Gestión, desarrollo y metodología de las Guías de Práctica Clínica y Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología Cytokine storm in Chikungunya: Correspondence Can we predict the risk factors for switching due to ineffectiveness in the first year of therapy with bDMARD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1