患者向谷歌询问哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?- 常见在线问题和在线资源的质量

Kyle K. Obana MD, Dane R.G. Lind BA, Michael A. Mastroianni MD, Alexander J. Rondon MD, MBA, Frank J. Alexander ATC, William N. Levine MD, Christopher S. Ahmad MD
{"title":"患者向谷歌询问哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?- 常见在线问题和在线资源的质量","authors":"Kyle K. Obana MD,&nbsp;Dane R.G. Lind BA,&nbsp;Michael A. Mastroianni MD,&nbsp;Alexander J. Rondon MD, MBA,&nbsp;Frank J. Alexander ATC,&nbsp;William N. Levine MD,&nbsp;Christopher S. Ahmad MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries has been an ongoing source of debate, with over 150 variations of surgery described in the literature. Without a consensus on surgical technique, patients are seeking answers to common questions through internet resources. This study investigates the most common online patient questions pertaining to AC joint injuries and the quality of the websites providing information.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>1) Question topics will pertain to surgical indications, pain management, and success of surgery and 2) the quality and transparency of online information are largely heterogenous.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three AC joint search queries were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the “People also ask” tab were expanded in order and 100 results for each query were included (300 total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell’s classification. Websites were categorized by source. Website quality was evaluated by the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)</em> Benchmark Criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (48.0%). The most common question topics were surgical indications (28.0%), timeline of recovery (13.0%), and diagnosis/evaluation (12.0%). The least common question topics were anatomy/function (3.3%), evaluation of surgery (3.3%), injury comparison (1.0%), and cost (1.0%). The most common websites were medical practice (44.0%), academic (22.3%), and single surgeon personal (12.3%). The average <em>JAMA</em> score for all websites was 1.0 ± 1.3. Government websites had the highest <em>JAMA</em> score (4.0 ± 0.0) and constituted 45.8% of all websites with a score of 4/4. PubMed articles constituted 63.6% (7/11) of government website. Comparatively, medical practice websites had the lowest <em>JAMA</em> score (0.3 ± 0.7, range [0-3]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Online patient AC joint injury questions pertain to surgical indications, timeline of recovery, and diagnosis/evaluation. Government websites and PubMed articles provide the highest-quality sources of reliable, up-to-date information but constitute the smallest proportion of resources. In contrast, medical practice represents the most visited websites, however, recorded the lowest quality score. Physicians should utilize this information to answer frequently asked questions, guide patient expectations, and help provide and identify reliable online resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000300/pdfft?md5=cb146aa38fa732160a91749f6c01ab06&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000300-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?—frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources\",\"authors\":\"Kyle K. Obana MD,&nbsp;Dane R.G. Lind BA,&nbsp;Michael A. Mastroianni MD,&nbsp;Alexander J. Rondon MD, MBA,&nbsp;Frank J. Alexander ATC,&nbsp;William N. Levine MD,&nbsp;Christopher S. Ahmad MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries has been an ongoing source of debate, with over 150 variations of surgery described in the literature. Without a consensus on surgical technique, patients are seeking answers to common questions through internet resources. This study investigates the most common online patient questions pertaining to AC joint injuries and the quality of the websites providing information.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>1) Question topics will pertain to surgical indications, pain management, and success of surgery and 2) the quality and transparency of online information are largely heterogenous.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three AC joint search queries were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the “People also ask” tab were expanded in order and 100 results for each query were included (300 total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell’s classification. Websites were categorized by source. Website quality was evaluated by the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)</em> Benchmark Criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (48.0%). The most common question topics were surgical indications (28.0%), timeline of recovery (13.0%), and diagnosis/evaluation (12.0%). The least common question topics were anatomy/function (3.3%), evaluation of surgery (3.3%), injury comparison (1.0%), and cost (1.0%). The most common websites were medical practice (44.0%), academic (22.3%), and single surgeon personal (12.3%). The average <em>JAMA</em> score for all websites was 1.0 ± 1.3. Government websites had the highest <em>JAMA</em> score (4.0 ± 0.0) and constituted 45.8% of all websites with a score of 4/4. PubMed articles constituted 63.6% (7/11) of government website. Comparatively, medical practice websites had the lowest <em>JAMA</em> score (0.3 ± 0.7, range [0-3]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Online patient AC joint injury questions pertain to surgical indications, timeline of recovery, and diagnosis/evaluation. Government websites and PubMed articles provide the highest-quality sources of reliable, up-to-date information but constitute the smallest proportion of resources. In contrast, medical practice represents the most visited websites, however, recorded the lowest quality score. Physicians should utilize this information to answer frequently asked questions, guide patient expectations, and help provide and identify reliable online resources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000300/pdfft?md5=cb146aa38fa732160a91749f6c01ab06&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000300-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肩锁关节(AC)损伤的治疗一直是争论的焦点,文献中描述了150多种不同的手术方法。在手术技术尚未达成共识的情况下,患者通过网络资源寻求常见问题的答案。本研究调查了与交流关节损伤有关的最常见的在线患者问题以及提供信息的网站的质量。假设1)问题主题将与手术适应症、疼痛管理和手术成功率有关;2)在线信息的质量和透明度在很大程度上是不同的。在 "People also ask "标签下的问题按顺序展开,每个查询包含 100 个结果(共 300 个)。问题根据罗斯威尔分类法进行分类。网站按来源分类。网站质量按照《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准进行评估。结果大多数问题属于罗斯威尔事实类(48.0%)。最常见的问题主题是手术适应症(28.0%)、恢复时间表(13.0%)和诊断/评估(12.0%)。最不常见的问题是解剖/功能(3.3%)、手术评估(3.3%)、损伤比较(1.0%)和费用(1.0%)。最常见的网站是医疗实践网站(44.0%)、学术网站(22.3%)和单个外科医生个人网站(12.3%)。所有网站的平均 JAMA 分数为 1.0 ± 1.3。政府网站的 JAMA 得分最高(4.0 ± 0.0),占所有网站的 45.8%,得分为 4/4。PubMed 文章占政府网站的 63.6%(7/11)。相比之下,医疗实践网站的 JAMA 得分最低(0.3 ± 0.7,范围 [0-3])。政府网站和 PubMed 上的文章提供了最高质量的可靠最新信息来源,但所占比例最小。相比之下,医疗实践网站的访问量最大,但质量得分最低。医生应利用这些信息回答常见问题,引导患者的期望,并帮助提供和识别可靠的在线资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?—frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources

Background

Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries has been an ongoing source of debate, with over 150 variations of surgery described in the literature. Without a consensus on surgical technique, patients are seeking answers to common questions through internet resources. This study investigates the most common online patient questions pertaining to AC joint injuries and the quality of the websites providing information.

Hypothesis

1) Question topics will pertain to surgical indications, pain management, and success of surgery and 2) the quality and transparency of online information are largely heterogenous.

Methods

Three AC joint search queries were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the “People also ask” tab were expanded in order and 100 results for each query were included (300 total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell’s classification. Websites were categorized by source. Website quality was evaluated by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria.

Results

Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (48.0%). The most common question topics were surgical indications (28.0%), timeline of recovery (13.0%), and diagnosis/evaluation (12.0%). The least common question topics were anatomy/function (3.3%), evaluation of surgery (3.3%), injury comparison (1.0%), and cost (1.0%). The most common websites were medical practice (44.0%), academic (22.3%), and single surgeon personal (12.3%). The average JAMA score for all websites was 1.0 ± 1.3. Government websites had the highest JAMA score (4.0 ± 0.0) and constituted 45.8% of all websites with a score of 4/4. PubMed articles constituted 63.6% (7/11) of government website. Comparatively, medical practice websites had the lowest JAMA score (0.3 ± 0.7, range [0-3]).

Conclusion

Online patient AC joint injury questions pertain to surgical indications, timeline of recovery, and diagnosis/evaluation. Government websites and PubMed articles provide the highest-quality sources of reliable, up-to-date information but constitute the smallest proportion of resources. In contrast, medical practice represents the most visited websites, however, recorded the lowest quality score. Physicians should utilize this information to answer frequently asked questions, guide patient expectations, and help provide and identify reliable online resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute compartment syndrome following biceps tendon rupture: a case report. A spontaneously resolved varix in the spinoglenoid notch: a case report. Medialization of shaft of humerus to provide medial buttress and prevent varus collapse in 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: review of the surgical technique. Median nerve entrapment neuropathy: a review on the pronator syndrome. Coracoid osteotomy approach for open free bone grafting of anterior glenoid defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1