将健康的社会决定因素纳入重症监护

Deepa Ramadurai MD , Heta Patel BS , Summer Peace BA , Justin T. Clapp PhD, MPH , Joanna L. Hart MD, MSHP
{"title":"将健康的社会决定因素纳入重症监护","authors":"Deepa Ramadurai MD ,&nbsp;Heta Patel BS ,&nbsp;Summer Peace BA ,&nbsp;Justin T. Clapp PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joanna L. Hart MD, MSHP","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social determinants of health (SDOHs) mediate outcomes of critical illness. Increasingly, professional organizations recommend screening for social risks. Yet, how clinicians should identify and then incorporate SDOHs into acute care practice is poorly defined.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>How do medical ICU clinicians currently operationalize SDOHs within patient care, given that SDOHs are known to mediate outcomes of critical illness?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>Using ethnographic methods, we observed clinical work rounds in three urban ICUs within a single academic health system to capture use of SDOHs during clinical care. Adults admitted to the medical ICU with respiratory failure were enrolled prospectively sequentially. Observers wrote field notes and narrative excerpts from rounding observations. We also reviewed electronic medical record documentation for up to 90 days after ICU admission. We then qualitatively coded and triangulated data using a constructivist grounded theory approach and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy People SDOHs framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-six patients were enrolled and &gt; 200 h of observation of clinical work rounds were included in the analysis. ICU clinicians infrequently integrated social structures of patients’ lives into their discussions. Social structures were invoked most frequently when related to: (1) causes of acute respiratory failure, (2) decisions regarding life-sustaining therapies, and (3) transitions of care. Data about common SDOHs were not collected in any systematic way (eg, food and housing insecurity), and some SDOHs were discussed rarely or never (eg, access to education, discrimination, and incarceration).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>We found that clinicians do not incorporate many areas of known SDOHs into ICU rounds. Improvements in integration of SDOHs should leverage the multidisciplinary team, identifying who is best suited to collect information on SDOHs during different time points in critical illness. Next steps include clinician-focused, patient-focused, and caregiver-focused assessments of feasibility and acceptability of an ICU-based SDOHs assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400011X/pdfft?md5=43c7735b0fc3930b46dd348f980f579f&pid=1-s2.0-S294978842400011X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Social Determinants of Health in Critical Care\",\"authors\":\"Deepa Ramadurai MD ,&nbsp;Heta Patel BS ,&nbsp;Summer Peace BA ,&nbsp;Justin T. Clapp PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joanna L. Hart MD, MSHP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social determinants of health (SDOHs) mediate outcomes of critical illness. Increasingly, professional organizations recommend screening for social risks. Yet, how clinicians should identify and then incorporate SDOHs into acute care practice is poorly defined.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>How do medical ICU clinicians currently operationalize SDOHs within patient care, given that SDOHs are known to mediate outcomes of critical illness?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>Using ethnographic methods, we observed clinical work rounds in three urban ICUs within a single academic health system to capture use of SDOHs during clinical care. Adults admitted to the medical ICU with respiratory failure were enrolled prospectively sequentially. Observers wrote field notes and narrative excerpts from rounding observations. We also reviewed electronic medical record documentation for up to 90 days after ICU admission. We then qualitatively coded and triangulated data using a constructivist grounded theory approach and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy People SDOHs framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-six patients were enrolled and &gt; 200 h of observation of clinical work rounds were included in the analysis. ICU clinicians infrequently integrated social structures of patients’ lives into their discussions. Social structures were invoked most frequently when related to: (1) causes of acute respiratory failure, (2) decisions regarding life-sustaining therapies, and (3) transitions of care. Data about common SDOHs were not collected in any systematic way (eg, food and housing insecurity), and some SDOHs were discussed rarely or never (eg, access to education, discrimination, and incarceration).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>We found that clinicians do not incorporate many areas of known SDOHs into ICU rounds. Improvements in integration of SDOHs should leverage the multidisciplinary team, identifying who is best suited to collect information on SDOHs during different time points in critical illness. Next steps include clinician-focused, patient-focused, and caregiver-focused assessments of feasibility and acceptability of an ICU-based SDOHs assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400011X/pdfft?md5=43c7735b0fc3930b46dd348f980f579f&pid=1-s2.0-S294978842400011X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400011X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景健康的社会决定因素(SDOHs)对危重病的预后起着中介作用。越来越多的专业组织建议对社会风险进行筛查。研究问题众所周知,SDOHs 是危重病预后的中介因素,那么内科 ICU 临床医生目前是如何在患者护理过程中操作 SDOHs 的?研究设计与方法我们采用人种学方法,观察了一个学术医疗系统中三个城市 ICU 的临床工作查房,以捕捉临床护理过程中 SDOHs 的使用情况。研究人员按顺序对入住内科重症监护室并出现呼吸衰竭的成人进行了前瞻性观察。观察人员撰写了现场笔记和查房观察的叙述性摘录。我们还查阅了重症监护室入院后 90 天内的电子病历文件。然后,我们采用建构主义基础理论方法和美国疾病控制和预防中心的健康人群 SDOHs 框架对数据进行了定性编码和三角测量。重症监护室的临床医生很少将患者生活中的社会结构纳入讨论。当涉及以下方面时,社会结构被引用的频率最高:(1) 急性呼吸衰竭的原因,(2) 有关维持生命疗法的决定,以及 (3) 护理过渡。我们发现临床医生并未将许多已知的 SDOHs 领域纳入 ICU 查房。要改进 SDOHs 的整合工作,应充分利用多学科团队,确定谁最适合在危重症的不同时间点收集 SDOHs 信息。下一步工作包括以临床医生、患者和护理人员为中心,评估基于 ICU 的 SDOHs 评估的可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating Social Determinants of Health in Critical Care

Background

Social determinants of health (SDOHs) mediate outcomes of critical illness. Increasingly, professional organizations recommend screening for social risks. Yet, how clinicians should identify and then incorporate SDOHs into acute care practice is poorly defined.

Research Question

How do medical ICU clinicians currently operationalize SDOHs within patient care, given that SDOHs are known to mediate outcomes of critical illness?

Study Design and Methods

Using ethnographic methods, we observed clinical work rounds in three urban ICUs within a single academic health system to capture use of SDOHs during clinical care. Adults admitted to the medical ICU with respiratory failure were enrolled prospectively sequentially. Observers wrote field notes and narrative excerpts from rounding observations. We also reviewed electronic medical record documentation for up to 90 days after ICU admission. We then qualitatively coded and triangulated data using a constructivist grounded theory approach and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy People SDOHs framework.

Results

Sixty-six patients were enrolled and > 200 h of observation of clinical work rounds were included in the analysis. ICU clinicians infrequently integrated social structures of patients’ lives into their discussions. Social structures were invoked most frequently when related to: (1) causes of acute respiratory failure, (2) decisions regarding life-sustaining therapies, and (3) transitions of care. Data about common SDOHs were not collected in any systematic way (eg, food and housing insecurity), and some SDOHs were discussed rarely or never (eg, access to education, discrimination, and incarceration).

Interpretation

We found that clinicians do not incorporate many areas of known SDOHs into ICU rounds. Improvements in integration of SDOHs should leverage the multidisciplinary team, identifying who is best suited to collect information on SDOHs during different time points in critical illness. Next steps include clinician-focused, patient-focused, and caregiver-focused assessments of feasibility and acceptability of an ICU-based SDOHs assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States Analytical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis Silent Burdens Prevalence of Inpatient Pulse Oximetry in Operative and Nonoperative Settings Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1