地区生态系统的复原力:COVID-19 时代的医疗服务组织、公共机构和社区

Q4 Medicine Mecosan Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.3280/mesa2023-125oa16859
Roberta Troisi, Stefania De Simone, Massimo Franco
{"title":"地区生态系统的复原力:COVID-19 时代的医疗服务组织、公共机构和社区","authors":"Roberta Troisi, Stefania De Simone, Massimo Franco","doi":"10.3280/mesa2023-125oa16859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare regional ecosystems' resilience in terms of their ability to contain the spread of Covid-19. This is carried out through institutional measures as well as through spontaneous community behaviour in order to preserve public health and the institutional actions to strengthen the health-care system in dealing with the pandemic. The discussion is framed through the institutional approach. We develop a twostep method. In the first step, regions have been clustered by considering the kind of response to Covid-19, in terms of formal and informal rules. In the second step a random effect panel regression analysis was performed in order to define the effect of the single response variable to Covid-19 on the resilience index over time. Implications for policy makers are then discussed. The first is that coping with a regional emergency requires taking into account regional specificities. Strictly imitative models risk being inconsistent with the characteristics of the area, resulting in outputs that are not homogeneous. The second involves social capital, which is crucial to the application of the norms. In regions with high social capital there is a sense of solidarity that presents itself in informal rules aimed at reinforcing the formal rules. However, there is no sense of conformity for the sake of conformance to the standard.","PeriodicalId":39077,"journal":{"name":"Mecosan","volume":"1015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The resilience of the regional ecosystems: Healthcare-service organizations, public agents and communities in the times of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Troisi, Stefania De Simone, Massimo Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/mesa2023-125oa16859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to compare regional ecosystems' resilience in terms of their ability to contain the spread of Covid-19. This is carried out through institutional measures as well as through spontaneous community behaviour in order to preserve public health and the institutional actions to strengthen the health-care system in dealing with the pandemic. The discussion is framed through the institutional approach. We develop a twostep method. In the first step, regions have been clustered by considering the kind of response to Covid-19, in terms of formal and informal rules. In the second step a random effect panel regression analysis was performed in order to define the effect of the single response variable to Covid-19 on the resilience index over time. Implications for policy makers are then discussed. The first is that coping with a regional emergency requires taking into account regional specificities. Strictly imitative models risk being inconsistent with the characteristics of the area, resulting in outputs that are not homogeneous. The second involves social capital, which is crucial to the application of the norms. In regions with high social capital there is a sense of solidarity that presents itself in informal rules aimed at reinforcing the formal rules. However, there is no sense of conformity for the sake of conformance to the standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mecosan\",\"volume\":\"1015 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mecosan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/mesa2023-125oa16859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mecosan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/mesa2023-125oa16859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较区域生态系统在遏制 Covid-19 传播方面的复原力。通过制度措施和社区自发行为进行比较,以维护公众健康,并通过制度行动加强医疗保健系统应对大流行病的能力。讨论的框架是制度方法。我们制定了一个分两步走的方法。第一步,从正式和非正式规则的角度考虑对 Covid-19 的反应类型,对地区进行分组。第二步,进行随机效应面板回归分析,以确定 Covid-19 的单一响应变量对复原力指数随时间变化的影响。然后讨论了对决策者的启示。首先,应对地区紧急事件需要考虑地区的特殊性。严格模仿的模型有可能不符合该地区的特点,导致产出不一致。其次,社会资本对规范的应用至关重要。在社会资本较高的地区,人们有一种团结的意识,这种意识体现在旨在加强正式规则的非正式规则中。然而,并不存在为遵守标准而遵守标准的意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The resilience of the regional ecosystems: Healthcare-service organizations, public agents and communities in the times of COVID-19
The aim of this study is to compare regional ecosystems' resilience in terms of their ability to contain the spread of Covid-19. This is carried out through institutional measures as well as through spontaneous community behaviour in order to preserve public health and the institutional actions to strengthen the health-care system in dealing with the pandemic. The discussion is framed through the institutional approach. We develop a twostep method. In the first step, regions have been clustered by considering the kind of response to Covid-19, in terms of formal and informal rules. In the second step a random effect panel regression analysis was performed in order to define the effect of the single response variable to Covid-19 on the resilience index over time. Implications for policy makers are then discussed. The first is that coping with a regional emergency requires taking into account regional specificities. Strictly imitative models risk being inconsistent with the characteristics of the area, resulting in outputs that are not homogeneous. The second involves social capital, which is crucial to the application of the norms. In regions with high social capital there is a sense of solidarity that presents itself in informal rules aimed at reinforcing the formal rules. However, there is no sense of conformity for the sake of conformance to the standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mecosan
Mecosan Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Digital Health, Telemedicine, and Patient-centeredness: New Trends for Italian Healthcare after COVID-19 La programmazione è morta.. pensare al futuro in modo innovativo Verso nuovi modelli di cura per il paziente con asma grave: dieci proposte per lo scenario post DM77 SURVEY FIASO 2023 Malpractice Medica & Health Risk Management. Un percorso tecnico-strategico-specializzato a disposizione delle Associate per un approccio consapevole e data-driven alla gestione dei rischi clinico-sanitari ed economici Virtual healthcare communities of practice: An Italian experience during the Covid-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1