M. D. Yenpreddiwar, B. C. Nandeshwar, P. V. Mahatale, A. G. Gathe, M. M. Raut
{"title":"破坏高密度种植棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)的几种杂草控制技术的能量评估","authors":"M. D. Yenpreddiwar, B. C. Nandeshwar, P. V. Mahatale, A. G. Gathe, M. M. Raut","doi":"10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i22305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study was carried out at the Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth. Akola, Cotton Research Center in Maharashtra, India, for the kharif season to assess the effectiveness of various weed management strategies in high density planting system (HDPS) cotton and also to assess the energy studies of different weed control methods used with HDPS cotton for two consecutive years (2015–16 and 2016–17). The results showed that among the other treatments, application of Pendimethalin 38.7 CS PE @ 1.25 kg a.i./ ha fbhoeing at 30 DAS and one hand weeding at 45 DAS significantly improved the energy output (84627 and 123742Mj ha-1), energy balance (73492 and 120656Mj ha-1), energy balance per unit input (6.6 and 10.8Mj ha-1) and energy output per unit input ratio (7.60 and 11), with weedy check (control), however, lower values were seen. As a result, cotton production with various weed control techniques under high density planting technique significantly improved energy output, energy balance per unit input, and energy output per unit input ratio realized that, efficient enough in terms of energy consumption as appropriate energy management (avoid excess energy input consumption) favors to maximize energy output, energy balance with higher cotton production in rainfed areas under high density planting system.","PeriodicalId":477440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental agriculture international","volume":"12 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Evaluations of Several Weed Control Techniques that Undermine Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Planted in High Density\",\"authors\":\"M. D. Yenpreddiwar, B. C. Nandeshwar, P. V. Mahatale, A. G. Gathe, M. M. Raut\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i22305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study was carried out at the Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth. Akola, Cotton Research Center in Maharashtra, India, for the kharif season to assess the effectiveness of various weed management strategies in high density planting system (HDPS) cotton and also to assess the energy studies of different weed control methods used with HDPS cotton for two consecutive years (2015–16 and 2016–17). The results showed that among the other treatments, application of Pendimethalin 38.7 CS PE @ 1.25 kg a.i./ ha fbhoeing at 30 DAS and one hand weeding at 45 DAS significantly improved the energy output (84627 and 123742Mj ha-1), energy balance (73492 and 120656Mj ha-1), energy balance per unit input (6.6 and 10.8Mj ha-1) and energy output per unit input ratio (7.60 and 11), with weedy check (control), however, lower values were seen. As a result, cotton production with various weed control techniques under high density planting technique significantly improved energy output, energy balance per unit input, and energy output per unit input ratio realized that, efficient enough in terms of energy consumption as appropriate energy management (avoid excess energy input consumption) favors to maximize energy output, energy balance with higher cotton production in rainfed areas under high density planting system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of experimental agriculture international\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of experimental agriculture international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i22305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental agriculture international","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i22305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究是在印度马哈拉施特拉邦阿科拉的棉花研究中心 Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth 博士的指导下进行的。印度马哈拉施特拉邦阿科拉(Akola)棉花研究中心进行,目的是评估各种杂草管理策略在高密度种植系统(HDPS)棉花中的效果,同时评估连续两年(2015-16 年和 2016-17 年)在高密度种植系统棉花中使用不同杂草控制方法的能量研究。结果表明,在其他处理中,在30 DAS时施用嘧菌酯38.7 CS PE @ 1.25 kg a.i./ ha锄草和在45 DAS时单手除草显著提高了能量产出(84627和123742百万焦耳/公顷-1)、能量平衡(73492和120656百万焦耳/公顷-1)、单位投入的能量平衡(6.6和10.8百万焦耳/公顷-1)和单位投入的能量产出比(7.60和11),但杂草对照(对照)的数值较低。因此,在高密度种植技术下,采用各种杂草控制技术的棉花生产显著提高了能量产出、单位投入的能量平衡和单位投入的能量产出比,这表明在高密度种植系统下,适当的能源管理(避免过多的能源投入消耗)有利于最大限度地提高能量产出和能量平衡,从而提高雨浇地区的棉花产量。
Energy Evaluations of Several Weed Control Techniques that Undermine Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Planted in High Density
The current study was carried out at the Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth. Akola, Cotton Research Center in Maharashtra, India, for the kharif season to assess the effectiveness of various weed management strategies in high density planting system (HDPS) cotton and also to assess the energy studies of different weed control methods used with HDPS cotton for two consecutive years (2015–16 and 2016–17). The results showed that among the other treatments, application of Pendimethalin 38.7 CS PE @ 1.25 kg a.i./ ha fbhoeing at 30 DAS and one hand weeding at 45 DAS significantly improved the energy output (84627 and 123742Mj ha-1), energy balance (73492 and 120656Mj ha-1), energy balance per unit input (6.6 and 10.8Mj ha-1) and energy output per unit input ratio (7.60 and 11), with weedy check (control), however, lower values were seen. As a result, cotton production with various weed control techniques under high density planting technique significantly improved energy output, energy balance per unit input, and energy output per unit input ratio realized that, efficient enough in terms of energy consumption as appropriate energy management (avoid excess energy input consumption) favors to maximize energy output, energy balance with higher cotton production in rainfed areas under high density planting system.