Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat
{"title":"单调度域和多调度域策略下的 C-RAN 时延和公平性分析","authors":"Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat","doi":"10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCentralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network\narchitecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on\nfronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important\nfor the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied\nwith the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.\n\n\n\nSo, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and\nfairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different\nscheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three\nupper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated\nfor the entire uplink channel.\n\n\n\nTo implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for\nsingle scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional\nsplit options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.\n\n\n\nA closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms,\nas well as trade-offs between them.\n\n\n\nThe results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article.\n\n\n\nFor quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred\nif multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of\nC-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.\n","PeriodicalId":37686,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","volume":"77 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delay and Fairness Analysis of C-RAN for Single and Multi Scheduling Domain Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nCentralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network\\narchitecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on\\nfronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important\\nfor the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied\\nwith the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.\\n\\n\\n\\nSo, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and\\nfairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different\\nscheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three\\nupper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated\\nfor the entire uplink channel.\\n\\n\\n\\nTo implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for\\nsingle scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional\\nsplit options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.\\n\\n\\n\\nA closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms,\\nas well as trade-offs between them.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article.\\n\\n\\n\\nFor quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred\\nif multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of\\nC-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":37686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delay and Fairness Analysis of C-RAN for Single and Multi Scheduling Domain Strategies
Centralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network
architecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on
fronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important
for the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied
with the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.
So, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and
fairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different
scheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three
upper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated
for the entire uplink channel.
To implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for
single scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional
split options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.
A closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms,
as well as trade-offs between them.
The results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article.
For quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred
if multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of
C-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control publishes timely research articles, full-length/ mini reviews and communications on these three strongly related areas, with emphasis on networked control systems whose sensors are interconnected via wireless communication networks. The emergence of high speed wireless network technologies allows a cluster of devices to be linked together economically to form a distributed system. Wireless communication is playing an increasingly important role in such distributed systems. Transmitting sensor measurements and control commands over wireless links allows rapid deployment, flexible installation, fully mobile operation and prevents the cable wear and tear problem in industrial automation, healthcare and environmental assessment. Wireless networked systems has raised and continues to raise fundamental challenges in the fields of science, engineering and industrial applications, hence, more new modelling techniques, problem formulations and solutions are required.