单调度域和多调度域策略下的 C-RAN 时延和公平性分析

Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat
{"title":"单调度域和多调度域策略下的 C-RAN 时延和公平性分析","authors":"Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat","doi":"10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCentralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network\narchitecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on\nfronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important\nfor the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied\nwith the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.\n\n\n\nSo, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and\nfairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different\nscheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three\nupper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated\nfor the entire uplink channel.\n\n\n\nTo implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for\nsingle scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional\nsplit options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.\n\n\n\nA closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms,\nas well as trade-offs between them.\n\n\n\nThe results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article.\n\n\n\nFor quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred\nif multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of\nC-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.\n","PeriodicalId":37686,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","volume":"77 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delay and Fairness Analysis of C-RAN for Single and Multi Scheduling Domain Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Prasanna Dubey, R. Upadhyay, Uma Rathore Bhatt, Vijaylaxmi S. Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nCentralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network\\narchitecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on\\nfronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important\\nfor the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied\\nwith the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.\\n\\n\\n\\nSo, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and\\nfairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different\\nscheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three\\nupper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated\\nfor the entire uplink channel.\\n\\n\\n\\nTo implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for\\nsingle scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional\\nsplit options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.\\n\\n\\n\\nA closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms,\\nas well as trade-offs between them.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article.\\n\\n\\n\\nFor quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred\\nif multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of\\nC-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":37686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

集中式无线接入网(C-RAN)是下一代通信网络中最有前途的网络架构。它能满足网络回程对灵活性和大带宽的需求。一直以来,调度对于有组织地传输信息非常重要。因此,本文计算并分析了两种不同调度域的 C-RAN 架构的数据包传输持续时间、总传输时间、等待时间和公平性指数参数。总传输周期时间参数是针对 C-RAN 的三upper 功能拆分选项计算的。为实现网络场景,在 MATLAB 编辑器上针对 C-RAN 的三个较高功能分拆选项的单调度域 (SSD) 和多调度域 (MSD) 进行了大量脚本编写工作。对结果的仔细研究揭示了这两种算法的优缺点,以及它们之间的权衡。C-RAN 的低功能分割选项需要的传输周期时间较短。MSD 技术比 SSD 更公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delay and Fairness Analysis of C-RAN for Single and Multi Scheduling Domain Strategies
Centralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network architecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on fronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important for the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied with the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature. So, in this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and fairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different scheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three upper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated for the entire uplink channel. To implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for single scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional split options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random. A closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms, as well as trade-offs between them. The results provide the pros and cons of the two strategies as mentioned in the article. For quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred if multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of C-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control
International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control publishes timely research articles, full-length/ mini reviews and communications on these three strongly related areas, with emphasis on networked control systems whose sensors are interconnected via wireless communication networks. The emergence of high speed wireless network technologies allows a cluster of devices to be linked together economically to form a distributed system. Wireless communication is playing an increasingly important role in such distributed systems. Transmitting sensor measurements and control commands over wireless links allows rapid deployment, flexible installation, fully mobile operation and prevents the cable wear and tear problem in industrial automation, healthcare and environmental assessment. Wireless networked systems has raised and continues to raise fundamental challenges in the fields of science, engineering and industrial applications, hence, more new modelling techniques, problem formulations and solutions are required.
期刊最新文献
Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Channel Estimation for Mobile & PLC-VLC Based Broadband Communication System Optimizing Financial Decision Support Systems with Machine LearningDriven Recommendations An Energy-Balance Clustering Routing Protocol for Intra-Body Wireless Nanosensor Networks Unveiling Data Fairness Functional Requirements in Big Data Analytics Through Data Mapping and Classification Analysis An Intelligent Transport System Using Vehicular Network for Smart Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1