通过过去创造现在亚当-斯密与经济的必然性

IF 0.1 Theory in Action Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2401
Jeremy Wolf
{"title":"通过过去创造现在亚当-斯密与经济的必然性","authors":"Jeremy Wolf","doi":"10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes two claims: first, “the economy” in its contemporary sense is distinct from the object of classical political economy; and second, despite this distinction, social scientists have generated a narrative history of the economy that contributes to its appearance as natural and inevitable by presenting it as a continuous object. This article briefly examines some of the ways in which we read the language of “the economy” back onto Smith, contributing to this appearance of continuity. This article then demonstrates that while Smith may have originated or elaborated many of the concepts used by contemporary economists, he did not understand his own object to be “the economy,” and concludes with a brief discussion of the political possibilities opened up by such an assertion. [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative Studies Institute. E-mail address: journal@transformativestudies.org Website: http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2024 by The Transformative Studies Institute. All rights reserved.]","PeriodicalId":42347,"journal":{"name":"Theory in Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Producing the Present through the Past: Adam Smith and the Inevitability of the Economy\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article makes two claims: first, “the economy” in its contemporary sense is distinct from the object of classical political economy; and second, despite this distinction, social scientists have generated a narrative history of the economy that contributes to its appearance as natural and inevitable by presenting it as a continuous object. This article briefly examines some of the ways in which we read the language of “the economy” back onto Smith, contributing to this appearance of continuity. This article then demonstrates that while Smith may have originated or elaborated many of the concepts used by contemporary economists, he did not understand his own object to be “the economy,” and concludes with a brief discussion of the political possibilities opened up by such an assertion. [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative Studies Institute. E-mail address: journal@transformativestudies.org Website: http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2024 by The Transformative Studies Institute. All rights reserved.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":42347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory in Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory in Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了两个主张:第一,当代意义上的 "经济 "有别于古典政治经济学的研究对象;第二,尽管存在这种区别,社会科学家还是创造了一种关于经济的叙事史,将经济作为一个连续的研究对象,从而使其看起来自然而不可避免。本文简要探讨了我们以何种方式将 "经济 "的语言重新解读为斯密,从而促成了这种连续性的表象。然后,本文指出,虽然斯密可能是当代经济学家使用的许多概念的始作俑者或阐释者,但他并没有把自己的研究对象理解为 "经济",最后简要讨论了这一论断所带来的政治可能性。[文章副本可向转型研究所索取。电子邮件地址:journal@transformativestudies.org 网站:http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2024 由变革研究学院版权所有。保留所有权利]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Producing the Present through the Past: Adam Smith and the Inevitability of the Economy
This article makes two claims: first, “the economy” in its contemporary sense is distinct from the object of classical political economy; and second, despite this distinction, social scientists have generated a narrative history of the economy that contributes to its appearance as natural and inevitable by presenting it as a continuous object. This article briefly examines some of the ways in which we read the language of “the economy” back onto Smith, contributing to this appearance of continuity. This article then demonstrates that while Smith may have originated or elaborated many of the concepts used by contemporary economists, he did not understand his own object to be “the economy,” and concludes with a brief discussion of the political possibilities opened up by such an assertion. [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative Studies Institute. E-mail address: journal@transformativestudies.org Website: http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2024 by The Transformative Studies Institute. All rights reserved.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory in Action
Theory in Action SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Book Review: James Söderholm, Prince Hamlet. Lioness Writing Ltd. 2021. The Impact COVID had on Carceral Institutions in the United States Book Review: Steve Herbert, Too Easy to Keep: Life-Sentenced Prisoners and the Future of Mass Incarceration. First Edition. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2019. ISBN: 978- 0520300514 A Comparison of the Patient Wife in Boccaccio, Petrarch, Chaucer, and Lope Producing the Present through the Past: Adam Smith and the Inevitability of the Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1