苏联的集体化:实践与意识形态,其对农村社会影响的某些方面

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-297-315
A. Y. Davydov
{"title":"苏联的集体化:实践与意识形态,其对农村社会影响的某些方面","authors":"A. Y. Davydov","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-297-315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a comprehensive overview of the main approaches developed in historiography to understand the process of collectivization in the USSR, which determined several specific features of the transition of the domestic society from an agrarian phase to an industrial one. Arguing for the viability of the New Economic Policy’s rural economy and the deadlock of Stalin’s version of its collectivization, the author relies on the inherent “sympractical” type of peasant culture. The historically developed worldview of rural community members formed the basis for high labor motivation. The destruction of this worldview during the process of collectivization became the cause of tragedy. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of two stages of socialist transformation in the village. It examines the destructive impact of the expropriation of peasants on the economy in the first stage and explores the issues of crisis resolution in the second stage through the removal of certain restrictions on private farming. The article analyzes the factors of social degradation in the Soviet countryside in the 1930s and identifies their manifestation in interethnic relations. The novelty of the research lies in the author’s examination, based on the materials from the declassified “special file” of the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU(B) in the 2000s, of peculiar manifestations of collectivization contradictions in the fate of the Finnish population in the Leningrad region.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collectivization in USSR: Practice and Ideology, Some Aspects of its Impact on Rural Society\",\"authors\":\"A. Y. Davydov\",\"doi\":\"10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-297-315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article provides a comprehensive overview of the main approaches developed in historiography to understand the process of collectivization in the USSR, which determined several specific features of the transition of the domestic society from an agrarian phase to an industrial one. Arguing for the viability of the New Economic Policy’s rural economy and the deadlock of Stalin’s version of its collectivization, the author relies on the inherent “sympractical” type of peasant culture. The historically developed worldview of rural community members formed the basis for high labor motivation. The destruction of this worldview during the process of collectivization became the cause of tragedy. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of two stages of socialist transformation in the village. It examines the destructive impact of the expropriation of peasants on the economy in the first stage and explores the issues of crisis resolution in the second stage through the removal of certain restrictions on private farming. The article analyzes the factors of social degradation in the Soviet countryside in the 1930s and identifies their manifestation in interethnic relations. The novelty of the research lies in the author’s examination, based on the materials from the declassified “special file” of the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU(B) in the 2000s, of peculiar manifestations of collectivization contradictions in the fate of the Finnish population in the Leningrad region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nauchnyi Dialog\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nauchnyi Dialog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-297-315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-297-315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章全面概述了史学界为理解苏联集体化进程而开发的主要方法,这些方法决定了国内社会从农业阶段向工业阶段过渡的几个具体特征。在论证新经济政策的农村经济的可行性和斯大林版本的集体化的僵局时,作者依赖于农民文化固有的 "同情 "类型。农村社会成员在历史上形成的世界观构成了高劳动积极性的基础。这种世界观在集体化过程中遭到破坏,成为悲剧的根源。文章介绍了对农村社会主义改造两个阶段的比较分析结果。文章研究了第一阶段征用农民对经济的破坏性影响,并探讨了第二阶段通过取消对私人耕作的某些限制来解决危机的问题。文章分析了 20 世纪 30 年代苏联农村社会退化的因素,并指出了这些因素在民族关系中的表现。研究的新颖之处在于作者根据 2000 年代解密的列宁格勒地委 "特别档案 "材料,研究了集体化矛盾在列宁格勒地区芬兰人命运中的特殊表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collectivization in USSR: Practice and Ideology, Some Aspects of its Impact on Rural Society
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the main approaches developed in historiography to understand the process of collectivization in the USSR, which determined several specific features of the transition of the domestic society from an agrarian phase to an industrial one. Arguing for the viability of the New Economic Policy’s rural economy and the deadlock of Stalin’s version of its collectivization, the author relies on the inherent “sympractical” type of peasant culture. The historically developed worldview of rural community members formed the basis for high labor motivation. The destruction of this worldview during the process of collectivization became the cause of tragedy. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of two stages of socialist transformation in the village. It examines the destructive impact of the expropriation of peasants on the economy in the first stage and explores the issues of crisis resolution in the second stage through the removal of certain restrictions on private farming. The article analyzes the factors of social degradation in the Soviet countryside in the 1930s and identifies their manifestation in interethnic relations. The novelty of the research lies in the author’s examination, based on the materials from the declassified “special file” of the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU(B) in the 2000s, of peculiar manifestations of collectivization contradictions in the fate of the Finnish population in the Leningrad region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Development of Gold Mining Industry in Yakutia in 1920s Relations between Siberian and Kazakh Khanates in 15th-16th Centuries Features of Sheriff Court in Scotland in Early 19th Century (Exemplified by Selkirkshire County) Legal Historians of Russian Diaspora in 1920s—1930s Iran in South Caucasus: Foreign Policy Strategy and Regional Relations with Russia (1991—2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1