约旦阿拉伯语口语中愚蠢或固执表达的社会语用研究

Anas Abdelhafiz Al-Bawareed, A. M. Al-Harahsheh
{"title":"约旦阿拉伯语口语中愚蠢或固执表达的社会语用研究","authors":"Anas Abdelhafiz Al-Bawareed, A. M. Al-Harahsheh","doi":"10.46515/jaes.v9i1.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated the impact of age and gender on the use of impoliteness strategies deduced from the use of metaphorical expressions of stupidity and stubbornness in Jordanian Spoken Arabic (JSA). The data has been collected through a Discourse Completion Task (DCT), which consisted of 20 situations related to stupidity and stubbornness. The participants of the study were 200 Jordanian males and females whose ages ranged between 20-65-year-old. The study adopted Culpeper's (1996) model as a theoretical framework to analyze the data.  The findings showed that the most frequently used strategy is positive impoliteness while the least used strategy is sarcasm among male and female speakers. It was also found out that younger speakers outperformed the other age ranges of speakers in the use of impoliteness strategies. Jordanian elderly female speakers used the positive output strategies more than males in JSA, whereas middle age speakers used these strategies the least.","PeriodicalId":394836,"journal":{"name":"Jordanian Educational Journal","volume":"179 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Socio-Pragmatic Study of Stupidity or Stubbornness Expressions in Jordanian Spoken Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Anas Abdelhafiz Al-Bawareed, A. M. Al-Harahsheh\",\"doi\":\"10.46515/jaes.v9i1.475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigated the impact of age and gender on the use of impoliteness strategies deduced from the use of metaphorical expressions of stupidity and stubbornness in Jordanian Spoken Arabic (JSA). The data has been collected through a Discourse Completion Task (DCT), which consisted of 20 situations related to stupidity and stubbornness. The participants of the study were 200 Jordanian males and females whose ages ranged between 20-65-year-old. The study adopted Culpeper's (1996) model as a theoretical framework to analyze the data.  The findings showed that the most frequently used strategy is positive impoliteness while the least used strategy is sarcasm among male and female speakers. It was also found out that younger speakers outperformed the other age ranges of speakers in the use of impoliteness strategies. Jordanian elderly female speakers used the positive output strategies more than males in JSA, whereas middle age speakers used these strategies the least.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordanian Educational Journal\",\"volume\":\"179 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordanian Educational Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v9i1.475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordanian Educational Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v9i1.475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了约旦阿拉伯语口语(JSA)中使用愚蠢和固执的隐喻表达时,年龄和性别对使用无礼策略的影响。数据是通过 "话语完成任务"(DCT)收集的,该任务包括 20 个与愚蠢和固执有关的情境。研究对象为 200 名约旦男性和女性,年龄在 20-65 岁之间。研究采用 Culpeper(1996 年)的模型作为理论框架来分析数据。 研究结果表明,男性和女性说话者最常使用的策略是积极无礼,而最少使用的策略是讽刺。研究还发现,在使用无礼策略方面,年轻说话者的表现优于其他年龄段的说话者。在约旦语区,老年女性发言人比男性发言人更多地使用积极的输出策略,而中年发言人则最少使用这些策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Socio-Pragmatic Study of Stupidity or Stubbornness Expressions in Jordanian Spoken Arabic
The study investigated the impact of age and gender on the use of impoliteness strategies deduced from the use of metaphorical expressions of stupidity and stubbornness in Jordanian Spoken Arabic (JSA). The data has been collected through a Discourse Completion Task (DCT), which consisted of 20 situations related to stupidity and stubbornness. The participants of the study were 200 Jordanian males and females whose ages ranged between 20-65-year-old. The study adopted Culpeper's (1996) model as a theoretical framework to analyze the data.  The findings showed that the most frequently used strategy is positive impoliteness while the least used strategy is sarcasm among male and female speakers. It was also found out that younger speakers outperformed the other age ranges of speakers in the use of impoliteness strategies. Jordanian elderly female speakers used the positive output strategies more than males in JSA, whereas middle age speakers used these strategies the least.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of an Educational Strategy Based on the Aesthetic Approach in Improving the Reading Comprehension Skills of Second Intermediate Grade Female Students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Teaching Quality and its Relationship with Achievement Motivation of Tenth Grade Students in Kuwait State Multi-Dimensional Standard Measurement of the level of Marital Relationship in Saudi Society Social Communication Problems, Social Anxiety, and Mood Problems among Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder from Teachers' Point of View The Educational Implications of the Educational Philosophy at Yarmouk University on Students from the Viewpoint of the Faculty Members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1