Ghazanfar Jabbar, Mirza Sijeel Ahmed, Arsalan Sharif Malik, Shahzad Akhtar, F. Minhas, Muhammad Talha Makshoof, Zoha Shahid
{"title":"选择性肠吻合术后早期喂养与延迟喂养的比较","authors":"Ghazanfar Jabbar, Mirza Sijeel Ahmed, Arsalan Sharif Malik, Shahzad Akhtar, F. Minhas, Muhammad Talha Makshoof, Zoha Shahid","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effects of early and delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis in relation to a mean number of days of audible bowel sounds.Study Design: A cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Combined Military th th Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from 11th May 2019 to 10th November 2019.Methods: A total of 60 individuals undergoing gut anastomosis were divided into two groups. In group A, the NG tube was removed within 6 to 24 hours of surgery, and clear oral liquids (30ml/hour) were started. Oral fluids, including juices and soups on the other day after surgery, tailed by semisolid food at 3rd day, then regular food at 4 day and finally discharge at the 5 day. In group B, the NG tube was detached three to five days after the procedure, observing NG tube output <30-50cc daily. Then, patients were followed up in post-surgical wards for 48 hours. Patients were noted and informed of the time when bowel sounds were audible, the first flatus passed, and the first stool passed. Results: The mean age in group A was 40.23 ± 15.66 years, and in group B was 37.93 ± 15.23 years. Most of the patients, 31 (51.67%), were between 16 to 30 years of age. Out of 60 patients, 36 (60.0%) were males and 24 (40.0%) were females, with male to female ratio of 1.5:1. The mean number of days of audible bowel sounds in Group A (early feeding) was 1.57 ± 0.63 days while in Group B (delayed feeding) was 3.90 ± 0.76 days (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: This research established that the outcome of early feeding is better than the outcome of delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis. \nHow to cite this: Jabbar G, Ahmed MS, Malik AS, Akhtar S, Minhas FS, Makshoof MT, Shahid Z. Comparison of Early and Delayed Feeding After Elective Gut Anastomosis. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 101-106. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.411","PeriodicalId":516717,"journal":{"name":"Life and Science","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Early and Delayed Feeding after Elective Gut Anastomosis\",\"authors\":\"Ghazanfar Jabbar, Mirza Sijeel Ahmed, Arsalan Sharif Malik, Shahzad Akhtar, F. Minhas, Muhammad Talha Makshoof, Zoha Shahid\",\"doi\":\"10.37185/lns.1.1.411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the effects of early and delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis in relation to a mean number of days of audible bowel sounds.Study Design: A cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Combined Military th th Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from 11th May 2019 to 10th November 2019.Methods: A total of 60 individuals undergoing gut anastomosis were divided into two groups. In group A, the NG tube was removed within 6 to 24 hours of surgery, and clear oral liquids (30ml/hour) were started. Oral fluids, including juices and soups on the other day after surgery, tailed by semisolid food at 3rd day, then regular food at 4 day and finally discharge at the 5 day. In group B, the NG tube was detached three to five days after the procedure, observing NG tube output <30-50cc daily. Then, patients were followed up in post-surgical wards for 48 hours. Patients were noted and informed of the time when bowel sounds were audible, the first flatus passed, and the first stool passed. Results: The mean age in group A was 40.23 ± 15.66 years, and in group B was 37.93 ± 15.23 years. Most of the patients, 31 (51.67%), were between 16 to 30 years of age. Out of 60 patients, 36 (60.0%) were males and 24 (40.0%) were females, with male to female ratio of 1.5:1. The mean number of days of audible bowel sounds in Group A (early feeding) was 1.57 ± 0.63 days while in Group B (delayed feeding) was 3.90 ± 0.76 days (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: This research established that the outcome of early feeding is better than the outcome of delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis. \\nHow to cite this: Jabbar G, Ahmed MS, Malik AS, Akhtar S, Minhas FS, Makshoof MT, Shahid Z. Comparison of Early and Delayed Feeding After Elective Gut Anastomosis. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 101-106. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.411\",\"PeriodicalId\":516717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life and Science\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的比较选择性肠道吻合术后早期和延迟喂食对平均肠鸣音天数的影响:横断面研究:研究于2019年5月11日至2019年11月10日在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院(CMH)外科进行:共有 60 名接受肠吻合术的患者被分为两组。A 组在手术后 6 至 24 小时内拔除 NG 管,并开始口服清流液(30 毫升/小时)。术后第 2 天开始口服流质食物,包括果汁和汤类,第 3 天开始进食半固体食物,第 4 天开始进食常规食物,第 5 天开始出院。在 B 组,术后三至五天拔出 NG 管,观察 NG 管每日排出量 <30-50cc。然后,在手术后病房对患者进行 48 小时的随访。记录并告知患者听到肠鸣音的时间、首次排出肠胀气的时间和首次排出粪便的时间。结果A 组患者的平均年龄为(40.23±15.66)岁,B 组患者的平均年龄为(37.93±15.23)岁。大多数患者(31 人,占 51.67%)的年龄在 16-30 岁之间。60 名患者中,男性 36 人(60.0%),女性 24 人(40.0%),男女比例为 1.5:1。A 组(早期喂养)的平均肠鸣音天数为 1.57 ± 0.63 天,而 B 组(延迟喂养)的平均肠鸣音天数为 3.90 ± 0.76 天(P 值 = 0.0001)。结论该研究证实,择期肠吻合术后早期喂养的效果优于延迟喂养。如何引用Jabbar G, Ahmed MS, Malik AS, Akhtar S, Minhas FS, Makshoof MT, Shahid Z. 《择期肠吻合术后早期喂养与延迟喂养的比较》。生命与科学2024; 5(1):101-106. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.411
Comparison of Early and Delayed Feeding after Elective Gut Anastomosis
Objective: To compare the effects of early and delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis in relation to a mean number of days of audible bowel sounds.Study Design: A cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Combined Military th th Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from 11th May 2019 to 10th November 2019.Methods: A total of 60 individuals undergoing gut anastomosis were divided into two groups. In group A, the NG tube was removed within 6 to 24 hours of surgery, and clear oral liquids (30ml/hour) were started. Oral fluids, including juices and soups on the other day after surgery, tailed by semisolid food at 3rd day, then regular food at 4 day and finally discharge at the 5 day. In group B, the NG tube was detached three to five days after the procedure, observing NG tube output <30-50cc daily. Then, patients were followed up in post-surgical wards for 48 hours. Patients were noted and informed of the time when bowel sounds were audible, the first flatus passed, and the first stool passed. Results: The mean age in group A was 40.23 ± 15.66 years, and in group B was 37.93 ± 15.23 years. Most of the patients, 31 (51.67%), were between 16 to 30 years of age. Out of 60 patients, 36 (60.0%) were males and 24 (40.0%) were females, with male to female ratio of 1.5:1. The mean number of days of audible bowel sounds in Group A (early feeding) was 1.57 ± 0.63 days while in Group B (delayed feeding) was 3.90 ± 0.76 days (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: This research established that the outcome of early feeding is better than the outcome of delayed feeding after elective gut anastomosis.
How to cite this: Jabbar G, Ahmed MS, Malik AS, Akhtar S, Minhas FS, Makshoof MT, Shahid Z. Comparison of Early and Delayed Feeding After Elective Gut Anastomosis. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 101-106. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.411