{"title":"采用各种技术加固后受火灾损坏的 RC 梁的行为","authors":"Asser M. Elsheikh, H. H. Alzamili","doi":"10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High temperatures during a fire can significantly degrade the structural capacity of concrete. However, in many cases, it is possible to restore and strengthen fire-damaged concrete rather than completely rebuild damaged structures. The study considered two types of concrete (normal 25 MPa and high-strength 65 MPa) with two types of strengthening techniques: carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) sheets with different thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.5 mm and slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON) jacketing with different fiber sizes of 20 and 30 mm. The numerical simulations and analyses were conducted to capture the complex behavior of fire-damaged concrete members (beams). A fire-damaged concrete beam subjected to an extreme or critical fire Exposure time (2 hours) was evaluated and modified using a finite element simulation approach. The simulation process included three stages: the first, subjecting the concrete beam to thermal loading; the second, reflecting the fire distribution map to another model of applying mechanical loading; and the third, involving the application of strengthening to the damaged model. The results showed that the strengthening using CFRP with a thickness of 2.5 improved the load-carrying capacity compared with SIFCON in both types of concrete. 200% improvement for the normal-strength concrete beam and a 136% improvement for the high-strength concrete beam, compared to the damaged beams. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-012 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":10233,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavior of Fire-damaged RC Beams After Strengthening with Various Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Asser M. Elsheikh, H. H. Alzamili\",\"doi\":\"10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High temperatures during a fire can significantly degrade the structural capacity of concrete. However, in many cases, it is possible to restore and strengthen fire-damaged concrete rather than completely rebuild damaged structures. The study considered two types of concrete (normal 25 MPa and high-strength 65 MPa) with two types of strengthening techniques: carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) sheets with different thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.5 mm and slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON) jacketing with different fiber sizes of 20 and 30 mm. The numerical simulations and analyses were conducted to capture the complex behavior of fire-damaged concrete members (beams). A fire-damaged concrete beam subjected to an extreme or critical fire Exposure time (2 hours) was evaluated and modified using a finite element simulation approach. The simulation process included three stages: the first, subjecting the concrete beam to thermal loading; the second, reflecting the fire distribution map to another model of applying mechanical loading; and the third, involving the application of strengthening to the damaged model. The results showed that the strengthening using CFRP with a thickness of 2.5 improved the load-carrying capacity compared with SIFCON in both types of concrete. 200% improvement for the normal-strength concrete beam and a 136% improvement for the high-strength concrete beam, compared to the damaged beams. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-012 Full Text: PDF\",\"PeriodicalId\":10233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Behavior of Fire-damaged RC Beams After Strengthening with Various Techniques
High temperatures during a fire can significantly degrade the structural capacity of concrete. However, in many cases, it is possible to restore and strengthen fire-damaged concrete rather than completely rebuild damaged structures. The study considered two types of concrete (normal 25 MPa and high-strength 65 MPa) with two types of strengthening techniques: carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) sheets with different thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.5 mm and slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON) jacketing with different fiber sizes of 20 and 30 mm. The numerical simulations and analyses were conducted to capture the complex behavior of fire-damaged concrete members (beams). A fire-damaged concrete beam subjected to an extreme or critical fire Exposure time (2 hours) was evaluated and modified using a finite element simulation approach. The simulation process included three stages: the first, subjecting the concrete beam to thermal loading; the second, reflecting the fire distribution map to another model of applying mechanical loading; and the third, involving the application of strengthening to the damaged model. The results showed that the strengthening using CFRP with a thickness of 2.5 improved the load-carrying capacity compared with SIFCON in both types of concrete. 200% improvement for the normal-strength concrete beam and a 136% improvement for the high-strength concrete beam, compared to the damaged beams. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-012 Full Text: PDF