{"title":"定量 MR 的真实模型:需求与建议(B1 套筒)","authors":"Paul S Tofts","doi":"10.1016/j.ipemt.2024.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantitative MR (qMR) has offered direct access to <em>in-vivo</em> biology and physiology for over three decades, yet it has failed to translate into the clinic. Why is this? The development of suitable phantoms is a key stage in the evolution of qMR, and here a systematic categorisation is proposed. Currently there is much attention paid to creating simple head phantoms containing materials with metrologically traceable values of MR quantities. However these are usually unrealistic; many of the disrupting phenomena present in clinical imaging are absent. Good performance with a simple traceable phantom is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for the establishment of good <em>in-vivo</em> measurement performance. There is therefore a premium on developing <em>realistic</em> phantoms. A proposal made for a more realistic body phantom that includes RF B<sub>1</sub> imperfections. It consists of lossy annuli placed around a standard head phantom. Other confounding phenomena could be identified, possibly built into an appropriate annulus around a simple head phantom, to form realistic phantoms; these would enable validation of qMR methods and translation to the clinic. The concept is probably applicable to other quantitative diagnostic imaging modalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73507,"journal":{"name":"IPEM-translation","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258824000049/pdfft?md5=66e3d7644488924b67b7aef8cf57afeb&pid=1-s2.0-S2667258824000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realistic phantoms for quantitative MR: the need and a proposal (the B1 sleeve)\",\"authors\":\"Paul S Tofts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipemt.2024.100026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantitative MR (qMR) has offered direct access to <em>in-vivo</em> biology and physiology for over three decades, yet it has failed to translate into the clinic. Why is this? The development of suitable phantoms is a key stage in the evolution of qMR, and here a systematic categorisation is proposed. Currently there is much attention paid to creating simple head phantoms containing materials with metrologically traceable values of MR quantities. However these are usually unrealistic; many of the disrupting phenomena present in clinical imaging are absent. Good performance with a simple traceable phantom is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for the establishment of good <em>in-vivo</em> measurement performance. There is therefore a premium on developing <em>realistic</em> phantoms. A proposal made for a more realistic body phantom that includes RF B<sub>1</sub> imperfections. It consists of lossy annuli placed around a standard head phantom. Other confounding phenomena could be identified, possibly built into an appropriate annulus around a simple head phantom, to form realistic phantoms; these would enable validation of qMR methods and translation to the clinic. The concept is probably applicable to other quantitative diagnostic imaging modalities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPEM-translation\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258824000049/pdfft?md5=66e3d7644488924b67b7aef8cf57afeb&pid=1-s2.0-S2667258824000049-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPEM-translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258824000049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPEM-translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258824000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Realistic phantoms for quantitative MR: the need and a proposal (the B1 sleeve)
Quantitative MR (qMR) has offered direct access to in-vivo biology and physiology for over three decades, yet it has failed to translate into the clinic. Why is this? The development of suitable phantoms is a key stage in the evolution of qMR, and here a systematic categorisation is proposed. Currently there is much attention paid to creating simple head phantoms containing materials with metrologically traceable values of MR quantities. However these are usually unrealistic; many of the disrupting phenomena present in clinical imaging are absent. Good performance with a simple traceable phantom is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for the establishment of good in-vivo measurement performance. There is therefore a premium on developing realistic phantoms. A proposal made for a more realistic body phantom that includes RF B1 imperfections. It consists of lossy annuli placed around a standard head phantom. Other confounding phenomena could be identified, possibly built into an appropriate annulus around a simple head phantom, to form realistic phantoms; these would enable validation of qMR methods and translation to the clinic. The concept is probably applicable to other quantitative diagnostic imaging modalities.