通过完成预先给予的恩惠了解人与机器人互动中的互惠性

Q2 Health Professions Smart Health Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100466
Reilly Moberg, Edward Downs, Abby Shelby, Arshia Khan
{"title":"通过完成预先给予的恩惠了解人与机器人互动中的互惠性","authors":"Reilly Moberg,&nbsp;Edward Downs,&nbsp;Abby Shelby,&nbsp;Arshia Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In today’s world, understanding how people interact with humanoid social robots is important for day-to-day interactions and design purposes. A phasic, between-subjects, psychophysiological experiment (N <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 72) examined how the norm of reciprocity influenced interactions with the humanoid social robot, “Pepper”. Facial electromyography (zygomatic and corrugator) was measured to determine participant’s emotional valence during interaction. The level of reciprocity in response to a pregiving favor was measured by the number of raffle tickets purchased by participants at the robot’s request. Results suggest that the social rule of reciprocation exists within human–robot interaction. When Pepper offered a pregiving favor to a participant, that person was more likely to reciprocate via the robot’s later ticket purchase request. Contributions to theory and design of humanoid social robots are discussed, as well as avenues for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37151,"journal":{"name":"Smart Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding reciprocity in human–robot interactions through completion of a pregiving favor\",\"authors\":\"Reilly Moberg,&nbsp;Edward Downs,&nbsp;Abby Shelby,&nbsp;Arshia Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In today’s world, understanding how people interact with humanoid social robots is important for day-to-day interactions and design purposes. A phasic, between-subjects, psychophysiological experiment (N <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 72) examined how the norm of reciprocity influenced interactions with the humanoid social robot, “Pepper”. Facial electromyography (zygomatic and corrugator) was measured to determine participant’s emotional valence during interaction. The level of reciprocity in response to a pregiving favor was measured by the number of raffle tickets purchased by participants at the robot’s request. Results suggest that the social rule of reciprocation exists within human–robot interaction. When Pepper offered a pregiving favor to a participant, that person was more likely to reciprocate via the robot’s later ticket purchase request. Contributions to theory and design of humanoid social robots are discussed, as well as avenues for future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648324000229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648324000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今世界,了解人们与仿人社交机器人的互动方式对于日常互动和设计目的都非常重要。一项阶段性、主体间、心理生理学实验(N = 72)研究了互惠准则如何影响人们与仿人社交机器人 "Pepper "的互动。通过测量面部肌电图(颧骨和耸肩肌)来确定参与者在互动过程中的情绪情感。参与者在机器人的要求下购买抽奖券的数量来衡量对预先给予的恩惠的互惠程度。结果表明,互惠这一社会规则存在于人与机器人的互动中。当 Pepper 向参与者提供预付优惠时,参与者更有可能通过机器人随后提出的购票要求进行回报。本文讨论了对仿人社交机器人理论和设计的贡献,以及未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding reciprocity in human–robot interactions through completion of a pregiving favor

In today’s world, understanding how people interact with humanoid social robots is important for day-to-day interactions and design purposes. A phasic, between-subjects, psychophysiological experiment (N = 72) examined how the norm of reciprocity influenced interactions with the humanoid social robot, “Pepper”. Facial electromyography (zygomatic and corrugator) was measured to determine participant’s emotional valence during interaction. The level of reciprocity in response to a pregiving favor was measured by the number of raffle tickets purchased by participants at the robot’s request. Results suggest that the social rule of reciprocation exists within human–robot interaction. When Pepper offered a pregiving favor to a participant, that person was more likely to reciprocate via the robot’s later ticket purchase request. Contributions to theory and design of humanoid social robots are discussed, as well as avenues for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Health
Smart Health Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Smart health practices: Strategies to improve healthcare efficiency through digital twin technology Human knowledge-based artificial intelligence methods for skin cancer management: Accuracy and interpretability study SAFE: Sound Analysis for Fall Event detection using machine learning Latent Space Representation of Adversarial AutoEncoder for Human Activity Recognition: Application to a low-cost commercial force plate and inertial measurement units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1