通过专家增强型监督特征选择实现可解释人工智能

IF 6.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Decision Support Systems Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114214
Meysam Rabiee , Mohsen Mirhashemi , Michael S. Pangburn , Saeed Piri , Dursun Delen
{"title":"通过专家增强型监督特征选择实现可解释人工智能","authors":"Meysam Rabiee ,&nbsp;Mohsen Mirhashemi ,&nbsp;Michael S. Pangburn ,&nbsp;Saeed Piri ,&nbsp;Dursun Delen","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive framework for expert-augmented supervised feature selection, addressing pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing aspects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). As part of pre-processing XAI, we introduce the Probabilistic Solution Generator through the Information Fusion (PSGIF) algorithm, leveraging ensemble techniques to enhance the exploration and exploitation capabilities of a Genetic Algorithm (GA). Balancing explainability and prediction accuracy, we formulate two multi-objective optimization models that empower expert(s) to specify a maximum acceptable sacrifice percentage. This approach enhances explainability by reducing the number of selected features and prioritizing those considered more relevant from the domain expert's perspective. This contribution aligns with in-processing XAI, incorporating expert opinions into the feature selection process as a multi-objective problem. Traditional feature selection techniques lack the capability to efficiently search the solution space considering our explainability-focused objective function. To overcome this, we leverage the Genetic Algorithm (GA), a powerful metaheuristic algorithm, optimizing its parameters through Bayesian optimization. For post-processing XAI, we present the Posterior Ensemble Algorithm (PEA), estimating the predictive power of features. PEA enables a nuanced comparison between objective and subjective importance, identifying features as underrated, overrated, or appropriately rated. We evaluate the performance of our proposed GAs on 16 publicly available datasets, focusing on prediction accuracy in a single objective setting. Moreover, we test our multi-objective model on a classification dataset to show the applicability and effectiveness of our framework. Overall, this paper provides a holistic and nuanced approach to explainable feature selection, offering decision-makers a comprehensive understanding of feature importance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55181,"journal":{"name":"Decision Support Systems","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 114214"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards explainable artificial intelligence through expert-augmented supervised feature selection\",\"authors\":\"Meysam Rabiee ,&nbsp;Mohsen Mirhashemi ,&nbsp;Michael S. Pangburn ,&nbsp;Saeed Piri ,&nbsp;Dursun Delen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive framework for expert-augmented supervised feature selection, addressing pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing aspects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). As part of pre-processing XAI, we introduce the Probabilistic Solution Generator through the Information Fusion (PSGIF) algorithm, leveraging ensemble techniques to enhance the exploration and exploitation capabilities of a Genetic Algorithm (GA). Balancing explainability and prediction accuracy, we formulate two multi-objective optimization models that empower expert(s) to specify a maximum acceptable sacrifice percentage. This approach enhances explainability by reducing the number of selected features and prioritizing those considered more relevant from the domain expert's perspective. This contribution aligns with in-processing XAI, incorporating expert opinions into the feature selection process as a multi-objective problem. Traditional feature selection techniques lack the capability to efficiently search the solution space considering our explainability-focused objective function. To overcome this, we leverage the Genetic Algorithm (GA), a powerful metaheuristic algorithm, optimizing its parameters through Bayesian optimization. For post-processing XAI, we present the Posterior Ensemble Algorithm (PEA), estimating the predictive power of features. PEA enables a nuanced comparison between objective and subjective importance, identifying features as underrated, overrated, or appropriately rated. We evaluate the performance of our proposed GAs on 16 publicly available datasets, focusing on prediction accuracy in a single objective setting. Moreover, we test our multi-objective model on a classification dataset to show the applicability and effectiveness of our framework. Overall, this paper provides a holistic and nuanced approach to explainable feature selection, offering decision-makers a comprehensive understanding of feature importance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000472\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Support Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了专家增强监督特征选择的综合框架,涉及可解释人工智能(XAI)的前处理、中处理和后处理方面。作为 XAI 预处理的一部分,我们通过信息融合(PSGIF)算法引入了概率解决方案生成器,利用集合技术增强遗传算法(GA)的探索和利用能力。在兼顾可解释性和预测准确性的同时,我们制定了两个多目标优化模型,使专家能够指定可接受的最大牺牲比例。这种方法通过减少所选特征的数量并优先考虑那些从领域专家的角度来看更为相关的特征,从而提高了可解释性。这一贡献与内处理 XAI 保持一致,将专家意见作为多目标问题纳入特征选择过程。考虑到我们以可解释性为重点的目标函数,传统的特征选择技术缺乏高效搜索解决方案空间的能力。为了克服这一问题,我们利用了遗传算法(GA)这一强大的元启发式算法,通过贝叶斯优化来优化其参数。为了对 XAI 进行后处理,我们提出了后验集合算法(PEA),以估计特征的预测能力。PEA 能够对客观重要性和主观重要性进行细微比较,识别出被低估、被高估或被适当评价的特征。我们在 16 个公开可用的数据集上评估了我们提出的遗传算法的性能,重点关注单一目标设置下的预测准确性。此外,我们还在一个分类数据集上测试了我们的多目标模型,以展示我们框架的适用性和有效性。总之,本文为可解释特征选择提供了一种全面而细致的方法,让决策者能够全面了解特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards explainable artificial intelligence through expert-augmented supervised feature selection

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for expert-augmented supervised feature selection, addressing pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing aspects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). As part of pre-processing XAI, we introduce the Probabilistic Solution Generator through the Information Fusion (PSGIF) algorithm, leveraging ensemble techniques to enhance the exploration and exploitation capabilities of a Genetic Algorithm (GA). Balancing explainability and prediction accuracy, we formulate two multi-objective optimization models that empower expert(s) to specify a maximum acceptable sacrifice percentage. This approach enhances explainability by reducing the number of selected features and prioritizing those considered more relevant from the domain expert's perspective. This contribution aligns with in-processing XAI, incorporating expert opinions into the feature selection process as a multi-objective problem. Traditional feature selection techniques lack the capability to efficiently search the solution space considering our explainability-focused objective function. To overcome this, we leverage the Genetic Algorithm (GA), a powerful metaheuristic algorithm, optimizing its parameters through Bayesian optimization. For post-processing XAI, we present the Posterior Ensemble Algorithm (PEA), estimating the predictive power of features. PEA enables a nuanced comparison between objective and subjective importance, identifying features as underrated, overrated, or appropriately rated. We evaluate the performance of our proposed GAs on 16 publicly available datasets, focusing on prediction accuracy in a single objective setting. Moreover, we test our multi-objective model on a classification dataset to show the applicability and effectiveness of our framework. Overall, this paper provides a holistic and nuanced approach to explainable feature selection, offering decision-makers a comprehensive understanding of feature importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs).
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of the effect of initiative risk statement versus passive risk disclosure on the financing performance of Kickstarter campaigns DeepSecure: A computational design science approach for interpretable threat hunting in cybersecurity decision making Editorial Board Effects of visual-preview and information-sidedness features on website persuasiveness The evolution of organizations and stakeholders for metaverse ecosystems: Editorial for the special issue on metaverse part 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1