电话分流服务在管理老年人计划外护理需求方面的安全性和效率是否较低?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100866
Farah Islam , Pieter Heeren , Marc Sabbe , Koen Milisen
{"title":"电话分流服务在管理老年人计划外护理需求方面的安全性和效率是否较低?","authors":"Farah Islam ,&nbsp;Pieter Heeren ,&nbsp;Marc Sabbe ,&nbsp;Koen Milisen","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>N</em> = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are telephone-triage services less safe and efficient for managing unplanned care needs of older adults?\",\"authors\":\"Farah Islam ,&nbsp;Pieter Heeren ,&nbsp;Marc Sabbe ,&nbsp;Koen Milisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>N</em> = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景作为 TRANS-SENIOR 国际培训和研究网络的一部分,本研究旨在描述和比较由全国性非工作时间(OOH)电话分诊服务接线员分派到全科医生(GP)处接受进一步治疗的年轻和年长患者的真实病历中,分诊决定(在安全和效率的前提下)的适当性。方法 利用从比利时弗拉芒大区 1733 非营业时间电话分诊服务中获得的匿名登记数据,并与通过 Mediris 平台提供的患者医疗记录相链接,开展了一项描述性研究。对 2019 年 5 月 24 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接到的所有电话进行了分析。通过比较 1733 电话分诊接线员在通话过程中估计的紧急程度与全科医生在对患者进行后续物理分诊时估计的紧急程度(被视为金标准),对分诊决定的适当性进行评估。总共有 69.1% 的电话涉及儿童或年轻人,30.9% 涉及老年人(65 岁及以上)。大多数(83.5%)由接线员调度接受全科医生户外家访的电话涉及老年人。经适当分流的电话中,儿童占 98.5%,年轻人占 96.5%,而老年人占 72.5%。老年人分流不足的比例分别为 1.5%(65 至 74 岁)、3.9%(75 至 84 岁)和 3.0%(≥ 85 岁),而老年人分流过度的比例分别为 16.2%(65 至 74 岁)、22.0%(75 至 84 岁)和 29.6%(≥ 85 岁)。结论我们的研究结果表明,虽然 1733 服务通常是管理人口意外护理需求的安全、高效的工具,但这些服务的效率还有待提高,尤其是对老年人而言。富有成效的研究工作应着眼于评估和比较使用 1733 服务从紧急医疗服务部门获得护理的呼叫结果,并进一步调查分流过度和分流不足呼叫的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are telephone-triage services less safe and efficient for managing unplanned care needs of older adults?

Background

As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).

Methods

A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).

Results

N = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1