Farah Islam , Pieter Heeren , Marc Sabbe , Koen Milisen
{"title":"电话分流服务在管理老年人计划外护理需求方面的安全性和效率是否较低?","authors":"Farah Islam , Pieter Heeren , Marc Sabbe , Koen Milisen","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>N</em> = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are telephone-triage services less safe and efficient for managing unplanned care needs of older adults?\",\"authors\":\"Farah Islam , Pieter Heeren , Marc Sabbe , Koen Milisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>N</em> = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are telephone-triage services less safe and efficient for managing unplanned care needs of older adults?
Background
As part of the TRANS-SENIOR international training and research network, this study aimed to describe and compare the appropriateness of triage decisions (within the context of safety and efficiency) for real world patient records of younger and older patients dispatched by operators of a national out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage service to receive further medical care by a general practitioner (GP).
Methods
A descriptive study was conducted using anonymized registry data obtained from the 1733 OOH telephone triage service in the Flemish region of Belgium linked with medical patient records made available via the Mediris platform. All calls received between May 24, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Appropriateness of triage decisions was assessed by comparing the level of urgency estimated by the 1733 telephone triage operator during the call versus the GP during follow-up physical triage of the patient (considered as the gold standard).
Results
N = 8,664 calls were included for analysis. In total, 69.1% of calls involved children or younger adults while 30.9 % involved older adults (65 years and over). The majority of calls (83.5 %) dispatched by operators to receive an OOH GP home visit involved older adults. The total percentage of appropriately triaged calls were distributed as 98.5 % in children and 96.5 % in younger adults versus 72.5 % in older adults. The percentage of under-triage in older adults was distributed as 1.5 % (65 to 74 years), 3.9 % (75 to 84 years) and 3.0 % (≥ 85 years) versus over-triage in older adults distributed as 16.2 % (65 to 74 years), 22.0 % (75 to 84 years) and 29.6 % (≥ 85 years).
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that while the 1733 service may generally be a safe and efficient tool for managing unplanned care needs of the population, there is room for improvement with regards to the efficiency of these services, particularly for older adults. Fruitful research efforts should aim to evaluate and compare findings with calls dispatched to obtain care from emergency medical services using the 1733 service as well as further investigate the nature of over- and under- triaged calls.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics