开发用于椎体 CT 图像年龄估计的深度学习算法

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102444
Ikuo Kawashita , Wataru Fukumoto , Hidenori Mitani , Keigo Narita , Keigo Chosa , Yuko Nakamura , Masataka Nagao , Kazuo Awai
{"title":"开发用于椎体 CT 图像年龄估计的深度学习算法","authors":"Ikuo Kawashita ,&nbsp;Wataru Fukumoto ,&nbsp;Hidenori Mitani ,&nbsp;Keigo Narita ,&nbsp;Keigo Chosa ,&nbsp;Yuko Nakamura ,&nbsp;Masataka Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The accurate age estimation of cadavers is essential for their identification. However, conventional methods fail to yield adequate age estimation especially in elderly cadavers. We developed a deep learning algorithm for age estimation on CT images of the vertebral column and checked its accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>For the development of our deep learning algorithm, we included 1,120 CT data of the vertebral column of 140 patients for each of 8 age decades. The deep learning model of regression analysis based on Visual Geometry Group-16 (VGG16) was improved in its estimation accuracy by bagging. To verify its accuracy, we applied our deep learning algorithm to estimate the age of 219 cadavers who had undergone postmortem CT (PMCT). The mean difference and the mean absolute error (MAE), the standard error of the estimate (SEE) between the known- and the estimated age, were calculated. Correlation analysis using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to assess differences between the known- and the estimated age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the 219 cadavers, the mean difference between the known- and the estimated age was 0.30 years; it was 4.36 years for the MAE, and 5.48 years for the SEE. The ICC (2,1) was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95–0.97, p &lt; 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there were no proportional or fixed errors (p = 0.08 and 0.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our deep learning algorithm for estimating the age of 219 cadavers on CT images of the vertebral column was more accurate than conventional methods and highly useful.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 102444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a deep-learning algorithm for age estimation on CT images of the vertebral column\",\"authors\":\"Ikuo Kawashita ,&nbsp;Wataru Fukumoto ,&nbsp;Hidenori Mitani ,&nbsp;Keigo Narita ,&nbsp;Keigo Chosa ,&nbsp;Yuko Nakamura ,&nbsp;Masataka Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The accurate age estimation of cadavers is essential for their identification. However, conventional methods fail to yield adequate age estimation especially in elderly cadavers. We developed a deep learning algorithm for age estimation on CT images of the vertebral column and checked its accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>For the development of our deep learning algorithm, we included 1,120 CT data of the vertebral column of 140 patients for each of 8 age decades. The deep learning model of regression analysis based on Visual Geometry Group-16 (VGG16) was improved in its estimation accuracy by bagging. To verify its accuracy, we applied our deep learning algorithm to estimate the age of 219 cadavers who had undergone postmortem CT (PMCT). The mean difference and the mean absolute error (MAE), the standard error of the estimate (SEE) between the known- and the estimated age, were calculated. Correlation analysis using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to assess differences between the known- and the estimated age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the 219 cadavers, the mean difference between the known- and the estimated age was 0.30 years; it was 4.36 years for the MAE, and 5.48 years for the SEE. The ICC (2,1) was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95–0.97, p &lt; 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there were no proportional or fixed errors (p = 0.08 and 0.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our deep learning algorithm for estimating the age of 219 cadavers on CT images of the vertebral column was more accurate than conventional methods and highly useful.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 对尸体进行准确的年龄估计对尸体鉴定至关重要。然而,传统方法无法准确估算年龄,尤其是对老年尸体。为了开发我们的深度学习算法,我们收集了 140 名患者 8 个年龄段的 1120 个椎体 CT 数据。基于视觉几何组-16(VGG16)的回归分析深度学习模型通过套袋法提高了估计精度。为了验证其准确性,我们应用深度学习算法估算了 219 具尸体 CT(PMCT)的年龄。我们计算了已知年龄和估计年龄之间的平均差和平均绝对误差(MAE)以及估计标准误差(SEE)。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和布兰-阿尔特曼(Bland-Altman)分析法进行相关性分析,以评估已知年龄和估计年龄之间的差异。结果 在 219 具尸体中,已知年龄和估计年龄之间的平均差异为 0.30 岁;MAE 为 4.36 岁,SEE 为 5.48 岁。ICC(2,1)为 0.96(95 % 置信区间:0.95-0.97,p < 0.001)。结论我们的深度学习算法可根据椎体 CT 图像估算 219 具尸体的年龄,比传统方法更准确,而且非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a deep-learning algorithm for age estimation on CT images of the vertebral column

Purpose

The accurate age estimation of cadavers is essential for their identification. However, conventional methods fail to yield adequate age estimation especially in elderly cadavers. We developed a deep learning algorithm for age estimation on CT images of the vertebral column and checked its accuracy.

Method

For the development of our deep learning algorithm, we included 1,120 CT data of the vertebral column of 140 patients for each of 8 age decades. The deep learning model of regression analysis based on Visual Geometry Group-16 (VGG16) was improved in its estimation accuracy by bagging. To verify its accuracy, we applied our deep learning algorithm to estimate the age of 219 cadavers who had undergone postmortem CT (PMCT). The mean difference and the mean absolute error (MAE), the standard error of the estimate (SEE) between the known- and the estimated age, were calculated. Correlation analysis using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to assess differences between the known- and the estimated age.

Results

For the 219 cadavers, the mean difference between the known- and the estimated age was 0.30 years; it was 4.36 years for the MAE, and 5.48 years for the SEE. The ICC (2,1) was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95–0.97, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there were no proportional or fixed errors (p = 0.08 and 0.41).

Conclusions

Our deep learning algorithm for estimating the age of 219 cadavers on CT images of the vertebral column was more accurate than conventional methods and highly useful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Complete aortic rupture following wakeboarding accident Evaluation of two scoring systems assessing the epiphyseal union at shoulder joint as predictors of chronological age among a sample of Egyptians Research progress and application of the third-generation sequencing technologies in forensic medicine The utility of drowning site inference through metagenomic diatom analysis Forensic and ecological significance of necrophagous insects: Insights from animal carcasses, human cadavers, and myiasis patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1