邮寄选票能降低成本吗?邮寄投票对居住在国外的芬兰选民投票率的影响微乎其微

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102776
Miroslav Nemčok , Hanna Wass , Johanna Peltoniemi
{"title":"邮寄选票能降低成本吗?邮寄投票对居住在国外的芬兰选民投票率的影响微乎其微","authors":"Miroslav Nemčok ,&nbsp;Hanna Wass ,&nbsp;Johanna Peltoniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Postal voting is often considered a means to enhance electoral participation by minimising the costs associated with voting. This study leverages individual-level register data for the entire electorate of Finns residing abroad who were provided the option of voting by mail in the 2019 parliamentary elections in addition to traditional in-person voting. Analysis of their voting trajectories across three parliamentary elections (2011, 2015, 2019) using such diverse approaches as descriptive statistics, interrupted time series analysis and an improved causal identification strategy revealed that the availability of postal voting was unlikely to increase electoral participation among this particular electorate despite previously low participation rates. The observed changes in turnout resembled previous elections, where only in-person voting at polling stations was available. The findings indicate that postal voting may not effectively address low turnout or participation biases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379424000349/pdfft?md5=31735d87c3ef183b91c7cd9ec74104cf&pid=1-s2.0-S0261379424000349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does sending ballots via post reduce costs? Negligible effect of postal voting on turnout among Finnish electorate living abroad\",\"authors\":\"Miroslav Nemčok ,&nbsp;Hanna Wass ,&nbsp;Johanna Peltoniemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Postal voting is often considered a means to enhance electoral participation by minimising the costs associated with voting. This study leverages individual-level register data for the entire electorate of Finns residing abroad who were provided the option of voting by mail in the 2019 parliamentary elections in addition to traditional in-person voting. Analysis of their voting trajectories across three parliamentary elections (2011, 2015, 2019) using such diverse approaches as descriptive statistics, interrupted time series analysis and an improved causal identification strategy revealed that the availability of postal voting was unlikely to increase electoral participation among this particular electorate despite previously low participation rates. The observed changes in turnout resembled previous elections, where only in-person voting at polling stations was available. The findings indicate that postal voting may not effectively address low turnout or participation biases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electoral Studies\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379424000349/pdfft?md5=31735d87c3ef183b91c7cd9ec74104cf&pid=1-s2.0-S0261379424000349-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electoral Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379424000349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379424000349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

邮寄投票通常被认为是通过最大限度降低投票相关成本来提高选举参与度的一种手段。本研究利用了居住在国外的芬兰人的全部选民的个人层面登记数据,这些人在2019年议会选举中除了传统的亲自投票外,还可以选择邮寄投票。利用描述性统计、间断时间序列分析和改进的因果识别策略等多种方法,对他们在三次议会选举(2011 年、2015 年、2019 年)中的投票轨迹进行了分析,结果显示,尽管以前的参与率较低,但邮寄投票的提供不太可能提高这一特殊选民的选举参与率。观察到的投票率变化与以前的选举相似,以前的选举只能在投票站进行亲自投票。研究结果表明,邮寄投票可能无法有效解决投票率低或参与偏差的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does sending ballots via post reduce costs? Negligible effect of postal voting on turnout among Finnish electorate living abroad

Postal voting is often considered a means to enhance electoral participation by minimising the costs associated with voting. This study leverages individual-level register data for the entire electorate of Finns residing abroad who were provided the option of voting by mail in the 2019 parliamentary elections in addition to traditional in-person voting. Analysis of their voting trajectories across three parliamentary elections (2011, 2015, 2019) using such diverse approaches as descriptive statistics, interrupted time series analysis and an improved causal identification strategy revealed that the availability of postal voting was unlikely to increase electoral participation among this particular electorate despite previously low participation rates. The observed changes in turnout resembled previous elections, where only in-person voting at polling stations was available. The findings indicate that postal voting may not effectively address low turnout or participation biases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electoral Studies
Electoral Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Electoral Studies is an international journal covering all aspects of voting, the central act in the democratic process. Political scientists, economists, sociologists, game theorists, geographers, contemporary historians and lawyers have common, and overlapping, interests in what causes voters to act as they do, and the consequences. Electoral Studies provides a forum for these diverse approaches. It publishes fully refereed papers, both theoretical and empirical, on such topics as relationships between votes and seats, and between election outcomes and politicians reactions; historical, sociological, or geographical correlates of voting behaviour; rational choice analysis of political acts, and critiques of such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Economic growth, largest-party vote shares, and electoral authoritarianism Targeting voters online: How parties’ campaigns differ Masking turnout inequality. Invalid voting and class bias when compulsory voting is reinstated Does decentralization boost electoral participation? Revisiting the question in a non-western context The populist impulse: Cognitive reflection, populist attitudes and candidate preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1