广义罗宾斯-蒙罗过程及其在阈值估计心理物理实验中的应用

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102855
Hau-Hung Yang, Yung-Fong Hsu
{"title":"广义罗宾斯-蒙罗过程及其在阈值估计心理物理实验中的应用","authors":"Hau-Hung Yang,&nbsp;Yung-Fong Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In classical psychophysics, the study of threshold and underlying representations is of theoretical interest, and the relevant issue of finding the stimulus intensity corresponding to a certain threshold level is an important topic. In the literature, researchers have developed various adaptive (also known as ‘up-down’) methods, including the fixed step-size and variable step-size methods, for the estimation of threshold. A common feature of this family of methods is that the stimulus to be assigned to the current trial depends upon the participant’s response in the previous trial(s), and very often a binary response format is adopted. A well-known earlier work of the variable step-size adaptive methods is the Robbins–Monro process (and its accelerated version). However, previous studies have paid little attention to other facets of response variables (in addition to the binary response variable) that could be jointly embedded into the process. This article concerns a generalization of the Robbins–Monro process by incorporating an additional response variable, such as the response time or the response confidence, into the process. We first prove the consistency of the estimator from the generalized method. We then conduct a Monte Carlo simulation study to explore some finite-sample properties of the estimator from the generalized method with either the response time or the response confidence as the variable of interest, and compare its performance with the original method. The results show that the two methods (and their accelerated version) are comparable. The issue of relative efficiency is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The generalized Robbins–Monro process and its application to psychophysical experiments for threshold estimation\",\"authors\":\"Hau-Hung Yang,&nbsp;Yung-Fong Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In classical psychophysics, the study of threshold and underlying representations is of theoretical interest, and the relevant issue of finding the stimulus intensity corresponding to a certain threshold level is an important topic. In the literature, researchers have developed various adaptive (also known as ‘up-down’) methods, including the fixed step-size and variable step-size methods, for the estimation of threshold. A common feature of this family of methods is that the stimulus to be assigned to the current trial depends upon the participant’s response in the previous trial(s), and very often a binary response format is adopted. A well-known earlier work of the variable step-size adaptive methods is the Robbins–Monro process (and its accelerated version). However, previous studies have paid little attention to other facets of response variables (in addition to the binary response variable) that could be jointly embedded into the process. This article concerns a generalization of the Robbins–Monro process by incorporating an additional response variable, such as the response time or the response confidence, into the process. We first prove the consistency of the estimator from the generalized method. We then conduct a Monte Carlo simulation study to explore some finite-sample properties of the estimator from the generalized method with either the response time or the response confidence as the variable of interest, and compare its performance with the original method. The results show that the two methods (and their accelerated version) are comparable. The issue of relative efficiency is also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249624000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249624000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经典心理物理学中,阈值和基本表征的研究具有理论意义,而寻找与某一阈值水平相对应的刺激强度是一个重要的相关问题。在文献中,研究人员开发了各种自适应(也称为 "上-下")方法,包括固定步长法和可变步长法,用于估计阈值。这一系列方法的共同特点是,分配给当前试验的刺激取决于被试在之前试验中的反应,而且通常采用二元反应格式。罗宾斯-蒙罗过程(及其加速版本)是可变步长自适应方法的早期著名作品。然而,以往的研究很少关注可共同嵌入该过程的其他响应变量(除二元响应变量外)。本文通过将额外的响应变量(如响应时间或响应置信度)纳入罗宾斯-门罗过程,对该过程进行了推广。我们首先证明了广义方法估计值的一致性。然后,我们进行了蒙特卡罗模拟研究,探讨了广义方法的估计器在以响应时间或响应置信度作为相关变量时的一些有限样本特性,并将其性能与原始方法进行了比较。结果表明,这两种方法(及其加速版本)具有可比性。此外,还讨论了相对效率问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The generalized Robbins–Monro process and its application to psychophysical experiments for threshold estimation

In classical psychophysics, the study of threshold and underlying representations is of theoretical interest, and the relevant issue of finding the stimulus intensity corresponding to a certain threshold level is an important topic. In the literature, researchers have developed various adaptive (also known as ‘up-down’) methods, including the fixed step-size and variable step-size methods, for the estimation of threshold. A common feature of this family of methods is that the stimulus to be assigned to the current trial depends upon the participant’s response in the previous trial(s), and very often a binary response format is adopted. A well-known earlier work of the variable step-size adaptive methods is the Robbins–Monro process (and its accelerated version). However, previous studies have paid little attention to other facets of response variables (in addition to the binary response variable) that could be jointly embedded into the process. This article concerns a generalization of the Robbins–Monro process by incorporating an additional response variable, such as the response time or the response confidence, into the process. We first prove the consistency of the estimator from the generalized method. We then conduct a Monte Carlo simulation study to explore some finite-sample properties of the estimator from the generalized method with either the response time or the response confidence as the variable of interest, and compare its performance with the original method. The results show that the two methods (and their accelerated version) are comparable. The issue of relative efficiency is also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1