在医疗系统中实施 2015 年美国甲状腺协会指南变更:提高质量的机会

Sara P. Ginzberg , Saiesh Kalva , Jacqueline M. Soegaard Ballester , Daniel A. Pryma , Susan J. Mandel , Rachel R. Kelz , Heather Wachtel
{"title":"在医疗系统中实施 2015 年美国甲状腺协会指南变更:提高质量的机会","authors":"Sara P. Ginzberg ,&nbsp;Saiesh Kalva ,&nbsp;Jacqueline M. Soegaard Ballester ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Pryma ,&nbsp;Susan J. Mandel ,&nbsp;Rachel R. Kelz ,&nbsp;Heather Wachtel","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the release of the 2015 management guidelines, the American Thyroid Association narrowed the indications for postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) in well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, the adoption of new guidelines varies between healthcare entities. The goal of this study was to characterize the appropriateness of RAI use within our health system, before and after the 2015 guideline changes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients who were treated for well-differentiated thyroid cancer between 2011–2020. Patients were characterized as “undertreated,” “appropriately treated,” or “overtreated” with RAI. Variation in RAI use was assessed using interrupted time series and multivariable logistic regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6310 patients, the mean age was 50 ± 15 years, and 74% were female. There was an immediate drop in the likelihood of receiving RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p = 0.016), and the likelihood of receiving RAI therapy continued to significantly decline over time (OR 0.83, p &lt; 0.001). Despite this trend in the absolute rate of RAI use, there was a significant increase in overtreatment with RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p &lt; 0.001), indicating imperfect uptake of the new criteria. Two hospitals within the health system were identified as disproportionate contributors to overtreatment (Hospital 4: OR 6.50, p &lt; 0.001; Hospital 6: OR 8.63, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the use of postoperative RAI was largely appropriate across our health system, rates of guideline adherence differed between hospitals. Efforts to standardize treatment protocols systemwide may enable more rapid and consistent uptake of new management guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000562/pdfft?md5=8adf612906ee053997d53b416d27a719&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000562-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline changes across a health system: A quality improvement opportunity\",\"authors\":\"Sara P. Ginzberg ,&nbsp;Saiesh Kalva ,&nbsp;Jacqueline M. Soegaard Ballester ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Pryma ,&nbsp;Susan J. Mandel ,&nbsp;Rachel R. Kelz ,&nbsp;Heather Wachtel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the release of the 2015 management guidelines, the American Thyroid Association narrowed the indications for postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) in well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, the adoption of new guidelines varies between healthcare entities. The goal of this study was to characterize the appropriateness of RAI use within our health system, before and after the 2015 guideline changes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients who were treated for well-differentiated thyroid cancer between 2011–2020. Patients were characterized as “undertreated,” “appropriately treated,” or “overtreated” with RAI. Variation in RAI use was assessed using interrupted time series and multivariable logistic regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6310 patients, the mean age was 50 ± 15 years, and 74% were female. There was an immediate drop in the likelihood of receiving RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p = 0.016), and the likelihood of receiving RAI therapy continued to significantly decline over time (OR 0.83, p &lt; 0.001). Despite this trend in the absolute rate of RAI use, there was a significant increase in overtreatment with RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p &lt; 0.001), indicating imperfect uptake of the new criteria. Two hospitals within the health system were identified as disproportionate contributors to overtreatment (Hospital 4: OR 6.50, p &lt; 0.001; Hospital 6: OR 8.63, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the use of postoperative RAI was largely appropriate across our health system, rates of guideline adherence differed between hospitals. Efforts to standardize treatment protocols systemwide may enable more rapid and consistent uptake of new management guidelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000562/pdfft?md5=8adf612906ee053997d53b416d27a719&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000562-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景随着 2015 年管理指南的发布,美国甲状腺协会缩小了分化良好的甲状腺癌术后放射性碘(RAI)的适应症范围。然而,不同医疗机构采用新指南的情况各不相同。本研究的目的是描述 2015 年指南变更前后我们医疗系统内 RAI 使用的适当性。方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了 2011-2020 年间接受过良好分化甲状腺癌治疗的患者。患者的特点是 RAI 治疗 "不足"、"适当治疗 "或 "过度治疗"。结果6310名患者中,平均年龄为50±15岁,74%为女性。2015 年指南发布后,接受 RAI 治疗的可能性立即下降(p = 0.016),随着时间的推移,接受 RAI 治疗的可能性继续显著下降(OR 0.83,p <0.001)。尽管 RAI 的绝对使用率呈上升趋势,但在 2015 年指南发布后,RAI 过度治疗的情况明显增加(p <0.001),这表明对新标准的吸收并不完善。结论虽然在我们的医疗系统中,术后 RAI 的使用在很大程度上是适当的,但不同医院对指南的遵守率却不尽相同。在全系统范围内统一治疗方案的努力可能会使新的管理指南得到更快、更一致的采纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline changes across a health system: A quality improvement opportunity

Background

With the release of the 2015 management guidelines, the American Thyroid Association narrowed the indications for postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) in well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, the adoption of new guidelines varies between healthcare entities. The goal of this study was to characterize the appropriateness of RAI use within our health system, before and after the 2015 guideline changes.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients who were treated for well-differentiated thyroid cancer between 2011–2020. Patients were characterized as “undertreated,” “appropriately treated,” or “overtreated” with RAI. Variation in RAI use was assessed using interrupted time series and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

Among 6310 patients, the mean age was 50 ± 15 years, and 74% were female. There was an immediate drop in the likelihood of receiving RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p = 0.016), and the likelihood of receiving RAI therapy continued to significantly decline over time (OR 0.83, p < 0.001). Despite this trend in the absolute rate of RAI use, there was a significant increase in overtreatment with RAI after the release of the 2015 guidelines (p < 0.001), indicating imperfect uptake of the new criteria. Two hospitals within the health system were identified as disproportionate contributors to overtreatment (Hospital 4: OR 6.50, p < 0.001; Hospital 6: OR 8.63, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

While the use of postoperative RAI was largely appropriate across our health system, rates of guideline adherence differed between hospitals. Efforts to standardize treatment protocols systemwide may enable more rapid and consistent uptake of new management guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1