Myles C. Murphy , Janet L. Taylor , Paola Chivers , Jonathan M. Hodgson , Casey Whife , Cobie Starcevich , Liam Tapsell , Joanne Kemp , Andrea Mosler
{"title":"利用经颅直流电刺激改善疗效并减轻髋关节骨性关节炎负担(STIM HIPS 研究):随机三盲对照试验方案","authors":"Myles C. Murphy , Janet L. Taylor , Paola Chivers , Jonathan M. Hodgson , Casey Whife , Cobie Starcevich , Liam Tapsell , Joanne Kemp , Andrea Mosler","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2024.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), <em>via</em> an electrical current being sent through the brains motor cortex, can elicit pain reduction and improved function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), compared to a sham. However, it is unknown whether tDCS-induced reductions in pain can be expected in hip OA given differences between hip and knee OA phenotypes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-armed (<em>n</em> = 39 per arm), triple-blind, randomised controlled trial, with an 8-week intervention window and 8-week post-intervention follow-up assessing the efficacy of real anodal tDCS plus exercise versus sham tDCS plus exercise. Primary outcome measure is the International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to quantify the effect of tDCS and exercise on pain, disability and quality of life in people with hip OA. Our secondary objectives include: 1) quantifying the influence of motor cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation on treatment effects, and 2) quantifying the economic cost/benefit of tDCS for improving health-related quality of life in people with hip OA.</p></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><p>Data distributions will be examined for each outcome and guide preliminary statistical between group test selections. Repeated mixed effects models will determine between-group differences for the primary outcome (iHOT-33), accounting for relevant confounders (i.e., age; sex; body mass index; radiographic severity) with relevant model assumptions examined. Secondary analysis will determine between-group differences for the other outcomes of interest (cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation).</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This randomised controlled trial investigates a novel intervention to improve pain, function and quality of life in people with hip OA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696724000048/pdfft?md5=e8f2a333240e238ea9ded886f5c0c998&pid=1-s2.0-S2772696724000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using transcranial direct current stimulation to improve outcomes and reduce hip osteoarthritis burden (the STIM HIPS study): A protocol for a randomised, triple blind controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Myles C. Murphy , Janet L. Taylor , Paola Chivers , Jonathan M. Hodgson , Casey Whife , Cobie Starcevich , Liam Tapsell , Joanne Kemp , Andrea Mosler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsampl.2024.100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), <em>via</em> an electrical current being sent through the brains motor cortex, can elicit pain reduction and improved function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), compared to a sham. However, it is unknown whether tDCS-induced reductions in pain can be expected in hip OA given differences between hip and knee OA phenotypes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-armed (<em>n</em> = 39 per arm), triple-blind, randomised controlled trial, with an 8-week intervention window and 8-week post-intervention follow-up assessing the efficacy of real anodal tDCS plus exercise versus sham tDCS plus exercise. Primary outcome measure is the International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to quantify the effect of tDCS and exercise on pain, disability and quality of life in people with hip OA. Our secondary objectives include: 1) quantifying the influence of motor cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation on treatment effects, and 2) quantifying the economic cost/benefit of tDCS for improving health-related quality of life in people with hip OA.</p></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><p>Data distributions will be examined for each outcome and guide preliminary statistical between group test selections. Repeated mixed effects models will determine between-group differences for the primary outcome (iHOT-33), accounting for relevant confounders (i.e., age; sex; body mass index; radiographic severity) with relevant model assumptions examined. Secondary analysis will determine between-group differences for the other outcomes of interest (cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation).</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This randomised controlled trial investigates a novel intervention to improve pain, function and quality of life in people with hip OA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSAMS plus\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696724000048/pdfft?md5=e8f2a333240e238ea9ded886f5c0c998&pid=1-s2.0-S2772696724000048-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSAMS plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696724000048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696724000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)通过向大脑运动皮层发送电流,与假刺激相比,能减轻膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者的疼痛并改善其功能。然而,鉴于髋关节OA和膝关节OA表型的差异,tDCS诱导的疼痛减轻是否可用于髋关节OA尚不得而知。方法双臂(每臂39人)、三盲、随机对照试验,8周干预窗口期和8周干预后随访,评估真实阳极tDCS加运动与假tDCS加运动的疗效。这项随机对照试验的主要目的是量化 tDCS 和运动对髋关节 OA 患者疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响。我们的次要目标包括1) 量化运动皮层兴奋性和条件性疼痛调节对治疗效果的影响,以及 2) 量化 tDCS 在改善髋关节 OA 患者健康相关生活质量方面的经济成本/效益。重复混合效应模型将确定主要结果(iHOT-33)的组间差异,并考虑相关混杂因素(即年龄、性别、体重指数、放射学严重程度)和相关模型假设。二次分析将确定其他相关结果(大脑皮层兴奋性和条件性疼痛调节)的组间差异。 意义这项随机对照试验研究了一种新型干预方法,以改善髋关节 OA 患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量。
Using transcranial direct current stimulation to improve outcomes and reduce hip osteoarthritis burden (the STIM HIPS study): A protocol for a randomised, triple blind controlled trial
Background
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), via an electrical current being sent through the brains motor cortex, can elicit pain reduction and improved function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), compared to a sham. However, it is unknown whether tDCS-induced reductions in pain can be expected in hip OA given differences between hip and knee OA phenotypes.
Methods
Two-armed (n = 39 per arm), triple-blind, randomised controlled trial, with an 8-week intervention window and 8-week post-intervention follow-up assessing the efficacy of real anodal tDCS plus exercise versus sham tDCS plus exercise. Primary outcome measure is the International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33).
Aims
The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to quantify the effect of tDCS and exercise on pain, disability and quality of life in people with hip OA. Our secondary objectives include: 1) quantifying the influence of motor cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation on treatment effects, and 2) quantifying the economic cost/benefit of tDCS for improving health-related quality of life in people with hip OA.
Analysis
Data distributions will be examined for each outcome and guide preliminary statistical between group test selections. Repeated mixed effects models will determine between-group differences for the primary outcome (iHOT-33), accounting for relevant confounders (i.e., age; sex; body mass index; radiographic severity) with relevant model assumptions examined. Secondary analysis will determine between-group differences for the other outcomes of interest (cortex excitability and conditioned pain modulation).
Implications
This randomised controlled trial investigates a novel intervention to improve pain, function and quality of life in people with hip OA.