金融知识和抵押贷款压力

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Banking & Finance Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170
Mingzhi Hu , Zhenguo Lin , Yingchun Liu
{"title":"金融知识和抵押贷款压力","authors":"Mingzhi Hu ,&nbsp;Zhenguo Lin ,&nbsp;Yingchun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the effect of financial literacy on mortgage stress. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we find that borrowers with high levels of financial literacy are over 60 percent less likely to suffer from mortgage stress than borrowers with low levels of financial literacy after controlling for observables. Our findings remain robust to various potential issues, including sample selection bias and functional misspecifications. Moreover, we find that the effect of financial literacy varies across different age groups of borrowers. Further analysis reveals strong cross effects of financial literacy and quantitative reasoning on mortgage stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial literacy and mortgage stress\",\"authors\":\"Mingzhi Hu ,&nbsp;Zhenguo Lin ,&nbsp;Yingchun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the effect of financial literacy on mortgage stress. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we find that borrowers with high levels of financial literacy are over 60 percent less likely to suffer from mortgage stress than borrowers with low levels of financial literacy after controlling for observables. Our findings remain robust to various potential issues, including sample selection bias and functional misspecifications. Moreover, we find that the effect of financial literacy varies across different age groups of borrowers. Further analysis reveals strong cross effects of financial literacy and quantitative reasoning on mortgage stress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了金融知识对抵押贷款压力的影响。利用收入动态面板研究(PSID)的数据,我们发现在控制了可观测变量之后,金融知识水平高的借款人比金融知识水平低的借款人承受抵押贷款压力的可能性低 60%以上。我们的研究结果对各种潜在问题都保持稳健,包括样本选择偏差和函数规范错误。此外,我们还发现金融知识对不同年龄段借款人的影响各不相同。进一步的分析表明,金融知识和定量推理对抵押贷款压力有很强的交叉影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial literacy and mortgage stress

This paper examines the effect of financial literacy on mortgage stress. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we find that borrowers with high levels of financial literacy are over 60 percent less likely to suffer from mortgage stress than borrowers with low levels of financial literacy after controlling for observables. Our findings remain robust to various potential issues, including sample selection bias and functional misspecifications. Moreover, we find that the effect of financial literacy varies across different age groups of borrowers. Further analysis reveals strong cross effects of financial literacy and quantitative reasoning on mortgage stress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
期刊最新文献
Three decades of failed bank acquisitions Factor momentum versus price momentum: Insights from international markets Editorial Board Does maker-taker limit order subsidy improve market outcomes? Quasi-natural experimental evidence Does regulatory and supervisory independence affect financial stability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1