2017 年至 2019 年欧洲医疗器械行业向医疗机构报告的付款情况:一项观察性研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100865
James Larkin , Shai Mulinari , Piotr Ozieranski , Kevin Lynch , Tom Fahey , Akihiko Ozaki , Frank Moriarty
{"title":"2017 年至 2019 年欧洲医疗器械行业向医疗机构报告的付款情况:一项观察性研究","authors":"James Larkin ,&nbsp;Shai Mulinari ,&nbsp;Piotr Ozieranski ,&nbsp;Kevin Lynch ,&nbsp;Tom Fahey ,&nbsp;Akihiko Ozaki ,&nbsp;Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. <em>MedTech Europe's</em> disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285/pdfft?md5=66282831ea8d60ac24853633e69387b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Payments to healthcare organisations reported by the medical device industry in Europe from 2017 to 2019: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"James Larkin ,&nbsp;Shai Mulinari ,&nbsp;Piotr Ozieranski ,&nbsp;Kevin Lynch ,&nbsp;Tom Fahey ,&nbsp;Akihiko Ozaki ,&nbsp;Frank Moriarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. <em>MedTech Europe's</em> disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285/pdfft?md5=66282831ea8d60ac24853633e69387b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标医疗器械行业向医疗机构(HCOs)支付的费用可能会产生利益冲突,从而影响对患者的护理。解决这一问题的方法之一是提高行业对医疗保健组织的财政支持的透明度。欧洲医疗技术协会(MedTech Europe)是一家医疗设备贸易机构,它有一套向欧洲医疗机构提供教育经费的披露系统。本研究旨在分析该数据库中报告的支付情况,并对披露系统进行评估。方法对欧洲医疗器械行业报告的向 HCOs 支付的教育相关费用进行观察研究。数据由人工从 transparentmedtech.eu 中提取。主要结果变量是付款的总价值,以及每年、付款类型和国家的付款价值。结果总体而言,116 家医疗器械公司报告在 53 个欧洲和非欧洲国家支付了与教育相关的款项,2017 年至 2019 年期间的价值超过 4.25 亿欧元,2017 年至 2019 年期间的价值从 93,798,419 欧元增至 175,414,302 欧元。其中,十个国家的支付额占总支付额的 94%,十家公司的支付额占总支付额的 80%。在数据库的可访问性、可用性和质量方面,有六项指标被评为 "低",六项指标被评为 "中",三项指标被评为 "高"。欧洲医疗技术组织的披露系统存在许多缺陷。医疗器械行业向医疗机构(如医院)支付了大量资金。医疗器械行业表示,这些钱是用来支付医疗专业人员的教育费用。然而,这些费用可能会对医护人员的决策产生负面影响。本研究试图考察欧洲医疗技术协会(MedTech Europe)运营的一个网站,该协会是医疗器械行业的一个代表机构,其网站概述了其中一些付款的详细信息 (www.transparentmedtech.eu)。我们的分析发现,2017 年至 2019 年间,医疗器械行业向欧洲医疗机构支付了价值 4.25 亿欧元的 "教育 "款项。我们还评估了数据库的全面性和用户友好性,发现了一系列问题。例如,该数据库无法下载,一些其他重要类型的付款(如咨询付款)也未包括在内。我们的结论是,由欧盟管理的医疗设备和制药行业强制性数据库将大大提高透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Payments to healthcare organisations reported by the medical device industry in Europe from 2017 to 2019: An observational study

Objective

Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. MedTech Europe, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.

Methods

An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.

Results

Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.

Conclusion

There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. MedTech Europe's disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.

Public interest summary

The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by MedTech Europe, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Identifying the risk factors of patient safety in internet hospitals: A mixed methods study Introduction of novel complex integrated care models supported by digital health interventions in European primary settings: a scoping review Trends in Medicare Charges, Reimbursements, and Utilization for Ophthalmic Versus Non-Ophthalmic Procedures A nationwide digital maturity assessment of hospitals – Results from the German DigitalRadar Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1