三阴性乳腺癌新辅助治疗中的铂剂量:系统综述和网络荟萃分析

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Current Problems in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101096
Fausto Petrelli , Antonio Ghidini , Carmen Rea , Maria Chiara Parati , Karen Borgonovo , Michele Ghidini , Fiorella Ruatta , Alberto Zaniboni , Andrea Luciani , Ornella Garrone , Gianluca Tomasello
{"title":"三阴性乳腺癌新辅助治疗中的铂剂量:系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Fausto Petrelli ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghidini ,&nbsp;Carmen Rea ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Parati ,&nbsp;Karen Borgonovo ,&nbsp;Michele Ghidini ,&nbsp;Fiorella Ruatta ,&nbsp;Alberto Zaniboni ,&nbsp;Andrea Luciani ,&nbsp;Ornella Garrone ,&nbsp;Gianluca Tomasello","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are multiple neoadjuvant regimens, including platinum agents for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), each with a different safety profile, outcome, and pathologic complete response rate (pCR%). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis t<strong>o</strong> compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based neoadjuvant CT treatments for TNBC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to October 31, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that evaluated the addition of carboplatin or cisplatin to standard neoadjuvant CT for TNBC. The primary endpoints were pCR rates and DFS/EFS, while the secondary endpoints were grade (G)3-4 hematological toxicity and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen trials involving 3154 patients comparing six treatments (carboplatin AUC 5, carboplatin AUC 6, carboplatin AUC 2, carboplatin AUC 1.5, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and standard anthracycline-and/or taxane-based CT) were identified. Based on the most effective treatments added to neoadjuvant CT, carboplatin AUC 2 was associated with the least improvement in pCR% (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.23, 1.8), carboplatin AUC 6 was associated with similar improvement in pCR% (RR 1.58, 95%CI, 1.35, 1.84) and carboplatin AUC 5 with the highest improvement in pCR% (RR 2.23, 95%CI, 1.6,32). The treatment associated with the most considerable improvement in DFS when added to neoadjuvant CT was carboplatin AUC 5 (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.18, 0.73). It was also better than AUC 6 and AUC 2 (HR= 0.45, 95%CI 0.21-0.96 and HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98). All schedules exhibited similar outcomes in terms of OS; however, only AUC 2 demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the no-platinum arms. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia G3-4 were significantly increased by carboplatin AUC 6.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on this network meta-analysis, carboplatin AUC 5 added to standard neoadjuvant CT may provide substantial pCR and DFS benefits with a low toxicity risk compared to other carboplatin doses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55193,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platinum dose in neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Fausto Petrelli ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghidini ,&nbsp;Carmen Rea ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Parati ,&nbsp;Karen Borgonovo ,&nbsp;Michele Ghidini ,&nbsp;Fiorella Ruatta ,&nbsp;Alberto Zaniboni ,&nbsp;Andrea Luciani ,&nbsp;Ornella Garrone ,&nbsp;Gianluca Tomasello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are multiple neoadjuvant regimens, including platinum agents for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), each with a different safety profile, outcome, and pathologic complete response rate (pCR%). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis t<strong>o</strong> compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based neoadjuvant CT treatments for TNBC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to October 31, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that evaluated the addition of carboplatin or cisplatin to standard neoadjuvant CT for TNBC. The primary endpoints were pCR rates and DFS/EFS, while the secondary endpoints were grade (G)3-4 hematological toxicity and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen trials involving 3154 patients comparing six treatments (carboplatin AUC 5, carboplatin AUC 6, carboplatin AUC 2, carboplatin AUC 1.5, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and standard anthracycline-and/or taxane-based CT) were identified. Based on the most effective treatments added to neoadjuvant CT, carboplatin AUC 2 was associated with the least improvement in pCR% (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.23, 1.8), carboplatin AUC 6 was associated with similar improvement in pCR% (RR 1.58, 95%CI, 1.35, 1.84) and carboplatin AUC 5 with the highest improvement in pCR% (RR 2.23, 95%CI, 1.6,32). The treatment associated with the most considerable improvement in DFS when added to neoadjuvant CT was carboplatin AUC 5 (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.18, 0.73). It was also better than AUC 6 and AUC 2 (HR= 0.45, 95%CI 0.21-0.96 and HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98). All schedules exhibited similar outcomes in terms of OS; however, only AUC 2 demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the no-platinum arms. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia G3-4 were significantly increased by carboplatin AUC 6.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on this network meta-analysis, carboplatin AUC 5 added to standard neoadjuvant CT may provide substantial pCR and DFS benefits with a low toxicity risk compared to other carboplatin doses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027224000370\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027224000370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言目前有多种新辅助治疗方案,包括治疗三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的铂类药物,每种方案的安全性、疗效和病理完全反应率(pCR%)各不相同。我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以比较不同的铂类药物新辅助 CT 治疗 TNBC 的疗效和安全性。方法检索了从开始到 2022 年 10 月 31 日的文献数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library)。符合条件的研究均为随机临床试验,这些试验评估了在 TNBC 标准新辅助 CT 中添加卡铂或顺铂的情况。结果确定了涉及3154名患者的13项试验,比较了六种治疗方法(卡铂AUC 5、卡铂AUC 6、卡铂AUC 2、卡铂AUC 1.5、顺铂75 mg/m2和基于蒽环类和/或类固醇的标准CT)。根据新辅助 CT 中添加的最有效治疗方法,卡铂 AUC 2 与 pCR% 的改善相关性最小(RR,1.49;95%CI,1.23,1.8),卡铂 AUC 6 与 pCR% 的改善相关性相似(RR 1.58,95%CI,1.35,1.84),卡铂 AUC 5 与 pCR% 的改善相关性最大(RR 2.23,95%CI,1.6,32)。卡铂 AUC 5(HR 0.36,95%CI 0.18,0.73)是在新辅助 CT 的基础上对 DFS 改善最大的治疗方法。它也优于 AUC 6 和 AUC 2(HR= 0.45,95%CI 0.21-0.96 和 HR=0.48,95%CI 0.23-0.98)。就OS而言,所有方案的结果相似;然而,与无铂方案相比,只有AUC 2方案有显著改善。结论根据这项网络荟萃分析,与其他卡铂剂量相比,在标准新辅助 CT 中加入卡铂 AUC 5 可带来显著的 pCR 和 DFS 益处,且毒性风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platinum dose in neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction

There are multiple neoadjuvant regimens, including platinum agents for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), each with a different safety profile, outcome, and pathologic complete response rate (pCR%). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based neoadjuvant CT treatments for TNBC.

Methods

Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to October 31, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that evaluated the addition of carboplatin or cisplatin to standard neoadjuvant CT for TNBC. The primary endpoints were pCR rates and DFS/EFS, while the secondary endpoints were grade (G)3-4 hematological toxicity and OS.

Results

Thirteen trials involving 3154 patients comparing six treatments (carboplatin AUC 5, carboplatin AUC 6, carboplatin AUC 2, carboplatin AUC 1.5, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and standard anthracycline-and/or taxane-based CT) were identified. Based on the most effective treatments added to neoadjuvant CT, carboplatin AUC 2 was associated with the least improvement in pCR% (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.23, 1.8), carboplatin AUC 6 was associated with similar improvement in pCR% (RR 1.58, 95%CI, 1.35, 1.84) and carboplatin AUC 5 with the highest improvement in pCR% (RR 2.23, 95%CI, 1.6,32). The treatment associated with the most considerable improvement in DFS when added to neoadjuvant CT was carboplatin AUC 5 (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.18, 0.73). It was also better than AUC 6 and AUC 2 (HR= 0.45, 95%CI 0.21-0.96 and HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98). All schedules exhibited similar outcomes in terms of OS; however, only AUC 2 demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the no-platinum arms. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia G3-4 were significantly increased by carboplatin AUC 6.

Conclusions

Based on this network meta-analysis, carboplatin AUC 5 added to standard neoadjuvant CT may provide substantial pCR and DFS benefits with a low toxicity risk compared to other carboplatin doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cancer
Current Problems in Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Cancer seeks to promote and disseminate innovative, transformative, and impactful data on patient-oriented cancer research and clinical care. Specifically, the journal''s scope is focused on reporting the results of well-designed cancer studies that influence/alter practice or identify new directions in clinical cancer research. These studies can include novel therapeutic approaches, new strategies for early diagnosis, cancer clinical trials, and supportive care, among others. Papers that focus solely on laboratory-based or basic science research are discouraged. The journal''s format also allows, on occasion, for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering articles that present dynamic material that influences the oncology field.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-based pathological application to predict regional lymph node metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Four versus six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced Urothelial carcinoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study (FOCUS, KCSG-GU23-08) Metaplastic breast cancer: Experience with ifosfamide based chemotherapy Table of Contents Title Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1