Doris Hernández , Anna Puupponen , Jarkko Keränen , Gerardo Ortega , Tommi Jantunen
{"title":"身体动作与常规化结构之间:手语理解中构建动作的神经机制","authors":"Doris Hernández , Anna Puupponen , Jarkko Keränen , Gerardo Ortega , Tommi Jantunen","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sign languages (SLs) are expressed through different bodily actions, ranging from re-enactment of physical events (constructed action, CA) to sequences of lexical signs with internal structure (plain telling, PT). Despite the prevalence of CA in signed interactions and its significance for SL comprehension, its neural dynamics remain unexplored. We examined the processing of different types of CA (subtle, reduced, and overt) and PT in 35 adult deaf or hearing native signers. The electroencephalographic-based processing of signed sentences with incongruent targets was recorded. Attenuated N300 and early N400 were observed for CA in deaf but not in hearing signers. No differences were found between sentences with CA types in all signers, suggesting a continuum from PT to overt CA. Deaf signers focused more on body movements; hearing signers on faces. We conclude that CA is processed less effortlessly than PT, arguably because of its strong focus on bodily actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55330,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Language","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 105413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X24000361/pdfft?md5=575876ea6257bf305b24edffacf45dd8&pid=1-s2.0-S0093934X24000361-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between bodily action and conventionalized structure: The neural mechanisms of constructed action in sign language comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Doris Hernández , Anna Puupponen , Jarkko Keränen , Gerardo Ortega , Tommi Jantunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sign languages (SLs) are expressed through different bodily actions, ranging from re-enactment of physical events (constructed action, CA) to sequences of lexical signs with internal structure (plain telling, PT). Despite the prevalence of CA in signed interactions and its significance for SL comprehension, its neural dynamics remain unexplored. We examined the processing of different types of CA (subtle, reduced, and overt) and PT in 35 adult deaf or hearing native signers. The electroencephalographic-based processing of signed sentences with incongruent targets was recorded. Attenuated N300 and early N400 were observed for CA in deaf but not in hearing signers. No differences were found between sentences with CA types in all signers, suggesting a continuum from PT to overt CA. Deaf signers focused more on body movements; hearing signers on faces. We conclude that CA is processed less effortlessly than PT, arguably because of its strong focus on bodily actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Language\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X24000361/pdfft?md5=575876ea6257bf305b24edffacf45dd8&pid=1-s2.0-S0093934X24000361-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X24000361\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X24000361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
手语(SL)通过不同的身体动作来表达,从物理事件的再现(构造动作,CA)到具有内部结构的词汇符号序列(简单讲述,PT)。尽管CA在签名互动中很普遍,而且对SL的理解也很重要,但其神经动态仍未得到研究。我们研究了 35 位成年聋人或听力正常的本地手语者对不同类型 CA(微妙、减少和明显)和 PT 的处理过程。我们记录了对目标不一致的手语句子的脑电处理过程。在聋人而非健听手语者身上观察到了 CA 的 N300 衰减和早期 N400 衰减。在所有手语者中,CA 类型的句子之间没有差异,这表明从 PT 到明显 CA 的连续性。聋人手语者更关注肢体动作,而健听手语者则更关注面部。我们的结论是,与 PT 相比,CA 的处理不那么轻松,这可以说是因为它非常注重身体动作。
Between bodily action and conventionalized structure: The neural mechanisms of constructed action in sign language comprehension
Sign languages (SLs) are expressed through different bodily actions, ranging from re-enactment of physical events (constructed action, CA) to sequences of lexical signs with internal structure (plain telling, PT). Despite the prevalence of CA in signed interactions and its significance for SL comprehension, its neural dynamics remain unexplored. We examined the processing of different types of CA (subtle, reduced, and overt) and PT in 35 adult deaf or hearing native signers. The electroencephalographic-based processing of signed sentences with incongruent targets was recorded. Attenuated N300 and early N400 were observed for CA in deaf but not in hearing signers. No differences were found between sentences with CA types in all signers, suggesting a continuum from PT to overt CA. Deaf signers focused more on body movements; hearing signers on faces. We conclude that CA is processed less effortlessly than PT, arguably because of its strong focus on bodily actions.
期刊介绍:
An interdisciplinary journal, Brain and Language publishes articles that elucidate the complex relationships among language, brain, and behavior. The journal covers the large variety of modern techniques in cognitive neuroscience, including functional and structural brain imaging, electrophysiology, cellular and molecular neurobiology, genetics, lesion-based approaches, and computational modeling. All articles must relate to human language and be relevant to the understanding of its neurobiological and neurocognitive bases. Published articles in the journal are expected to have significant theoretical novelty and/or practical implications, and use perspectives and methods from psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience along with brain data and brain measures.