护理专业学生背景调查结论的特点

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.04.002
Christopher Peters, Jennifer Doering
{"title":"护理专业学生背景调查结论的特点","authors":"Christopher Peters,&nbsp;Jennifer Doering","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Background checks are used in nursing education to assess public risk. To date, no study has described the most common and most serious findings in nursing students.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Our study describes the most common and most serious characteristics of BGC findings in nursing students attending large universities.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Our retrospective study describes characteristics of aggregated, de-identified background check data from a convenience sample of 16 US nursing programs set in large universities 2014–2019.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Sampled programs collected 45,613 background checks, with 1548 findings (3.4 %). Severity of findings included criminal (62.5 %), non-criminal (4.6 %), felony (0.8 %), and other (11.6 %). Severity data were missing from 20.4 % of records. Finding types included substance use (23.7 %), disorderly conduct (8.7 %), property crimes (2.4 %) and crimes against persons (1 %). Type data was missing from 64.3 % of records.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Future research should examine whether background check type or severity indicates a nursing student poses a public risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of background check findings in nursing students\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Peters,&nbsp;Jennifer Doering\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Background checks are used in nursing education to assess public risk. To date, no study has described the most common and most serious findings in nursing students.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Our study describes the most common and most serious characteristics of BGC findings in nursing students attending large universities.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Our retrospective study describes characteristics of aggregated, de-identified background check data from a convenience sample of 16 US nursing programs set in large universities 2014–2019.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Sampled programs collected 45,613 background checks, with 1548 findings (3.4 %). Severity of findings included criminal (62.5 %), non-criminal (4.6 %), felony (0.8 %), and other (11.6 %). Severity data were missing from 20.4 % of records. Finding types included substance use (23.7 %), disorderly conduct (8.7 %), property crimes (2.4 %) and crimes against persons (1 %). Type data was missing from 64.3 % of records.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Future research should examine whether background check type or severity indicates a nursing student poses a public risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 86-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324000541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324000541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景背景调查用于护理教育,以评估公共风险。迄今为止,还没有研究描述过护理专业学生中最常见和最严重的调查结果。目的我们的研究描述了就读于大型大学的护理专业学生中最常见和最严重的 BGC 调查结果的特征。调查结果的严重程度包括犯罪(62.5%)、非犯罪(4.6%)、重罪(0.8%)和其他(11.6%)。20.4% 的记录缺少严重程度数据。调查结果类型包括药物使用(23.7%)、扰乱治安(8.7%)、财产犯罪(2.4%)和侵犯人身罪(1%)。64.3%的记录中缺少类型数据。讨论未来的研究应探讨背景调查类型或严重程度是否表明护理专业学生构成了公共风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of background check findings in nursing students

Background

Background checks are used in nursing education to assess public risk. To date, no study has described the most common and most serious findings in nursing students.

Purpose

Our study describes the most common and most serious characteristics of BGC findings in nursing students attending large universities.

Method

Our retrospective study describes characteristics of aggregated, de-identified background check data from a convenience sample of 16 US nursing programs set in large universities 2014–2019.

Findings

Sampled programs collected 45,613 background checks, with 1548 findings (3.4 %). Severity of findings included criminal (62.5 %), non-criminal (4.6 %), felony (0.8 %), and other (11.6 %). Severity data were missing from 20.4 % of records. Finding types included substance use (23.7 %), disorderly conduct (8.7 %), property crimes (2.4 %) and crimes against persons (1 %). Type data was missing from 64.3 % of records.

Discussion

Future research should examine whether background check type or severity indicates a nursing student poses a public risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
A blueprint for integrating nursing history: Performance indicators for competency-based education Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Weaving Caring Science into the AACN Essentials: A cross-impact analysis and resource guide Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1