对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦卫生和社会政策中酒精和酒精相关危害的专题分析

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100143
Tayla Darrah , Sarah Herbert , Timothy Chambers
{"title":"对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦卫生和社会政策中酒精和酒精相关危害的专题分析","authors":"Tayla Darrah ,&nbsp;Sarah Herbert ,&nbsp;Timothy Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to: 1) explore how alcohol and alcohol harm are framed in New Zealand national policy, strategy, and action plan documents; and 2) examine how these documents align with the WHO SAFER framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Keyword searches across government websites and Google were conducted in January 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all identified documents, resulting in 22 being included for analysis in this study. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis of those documents was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our inductive thematic analysis identified three themes, of which one is detailed in this study: ‘Location of responsibility for addressing alcohol harms’ with a focus on individuals and non-specific government agencies. Thematic results from the deductive analysis found that the most consistently referenced SAFER policies included brief interventions (68% of documents), followed by drink driving measures (45%), alcohol marketing (36%), alcohol availability (27%), and alcohol price (23%). The conversion rate from a document mentioning a SAFER framework policy area to making specific policy recommendations was usually less than or around 50%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of alignment between New Zealand alcohol policy and the SAFER framework can be partially attributable to the absence of an updated national alcohol strategy (NAS). An updated NAS should identify responsible agencies, create a systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanism, and be consistent with the WHO SAFER framework.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>The analysis supports the need to update a national alcohol strategy to guide alcohol policy development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 2","pages":"Article 100143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000189/pdfft?md5=079c5814bc93325839c845e363f60dcf&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000189-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A thematic analysis of alcohol and alcohol-related harm across health and social policy in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Tayla Darrah ,&nbsp;Sarah Herbert ,&nbsp;Timothy Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to: 1) explore how alcohol and alcohol harm are framed in New Zealand national policy, strategy, and action plan documents; and 2) examine how these documents align with the WHO SAFER framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Keyword searches across government websites and Google were conducted in January 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all identified documents, resulting in 22 being included for analysis in this study. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis of those documents was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our inductive thematic analysis identified three themes, of which one is detailed in this study: ‘Location of responsibility for addressing alcohol harms’ with a focus on individuals and non-specific government agencies. Thematic results from the deductive analysis found that the most consistently referenced SAFER policies included brief interventions (68% of documents), followed by drink driving measures (45%), alcohol marketing (36%), alcohol availability (27%), and alcohol price (23%). The conversion rate from a document mentioning a SAFER framework policy area to making specific policy recommendations was usually less than or around 50%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of alignment between New Zealand alcohol policy and the SAFER framework can be partially attributable to the absence of an updated national alcohol strategy (NAS). An updated NAS should identify responsible agencies, create a systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanism, and be consistent with the WHO SAFER framework.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>The analysis supports the need to update a national alcohol strategy to guide alcohol policy development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000189/pdfft?md5=079c5814bc93325839c845e363f60dcf&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000189-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000189\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在1)探讨新西兰国家政策、战略和行动计划文件中如何阐述酒精和酒精危害;以及 2)研究这些文件如何与世界卫生组织的 SAFER 框架保持一致。方法于 2021 年 1 月在政府网站和谷歌上进行关键词搜索。对所有确定的文件采用了纳入和排除标准,最终有 22 份文件被纳入本研究进行分析。对这些文件进行了归纳和演绎主题分析。结果我们的归纳主题分析确定了三个主题,其中一个在本研究中进行了详细阐述:解决酒精危害的责任定位",重点关注个人和非特定政府机构。演绎式主题分析的结果发现,最常被提及的 SAFER 政策包括简短干预(68% 的文件),其次是酒驾措施(45%)、酒精营销(36%)、酒精供应(27%)和酒精价格(23%)。从文件提及 SAFER 框架政策领域到提出具体政策建议的转换率通常低于或接近 50%。结论新西兰酒精政策与 SAFER 框架不一致的部分原因可能是缺乏更新的国家酒精战略(NAS)。更新后的国家酒精战略应确定负责机构,建立系统的监测和评估机制,并与世界卫生组织的 SAFER 框架保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A thematic analysis of alcohol and alcohol-related harm across health and social policy in Aotearoa New Zealand

Objective

This study aims to: 1) explore how alcohol and alcohol harm are framed in New Zealand national policy, strategy, and action plan documents; and 2) examine how these documents align with the WHO SAFER framework.

Methods

Keyword searches across government websites and Google were conducted in January 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all identified documents, resulting in 22 being included for analysis in this study. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis of those documents was performed.

Results

Our inductive thematic analysis identified three themes, of which one is detailed in this study: ‘Location of responsibility for addressing alcohol harms’ with a focus on individuals and non-specific government agencies. Thematic results from the deductive analysis found that the most consistently referenced SAFER policies included brief interventions (68% of documents), followed by drink driving measures (45%), alcohol marketing (36%), alcohol availability (27%), and alcohol price (23%). The conversion rate from a document mentioning a SAFER framework policy area to making specific policy recommendations was usually less than or around 50%.

Conclusions

The lack of alignment between New Zealand alcohol policy and the SAFER framework can be partially attributable to the absence of an updated national alcohol strategy (NAS). An updated NAS should identify responsible agencies, create a systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanism, and be consistent with the WHO SAFER framework.

Implications for public health

The analysis supports the need to update a national alcohol strategy to guide alcohol policy development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Taking a strengths-based approach to mental health in rural communities: A systematic literature review Preliminary evaluation of a novel Aboriginal community–controlled prison health service for First Nations people A cross-sectional study of the experiences of distressed callers when accessing financial assistance from a telephone-based cancer information and support service Increasing awareness of sexually transmitted infections (STI) testing and addressing stigma may improve STI testing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Evidence from the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Psychedelic medicine and cultural responsiveness: A call for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement in Australian clinical trials and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1