总体政策的不确定性:林业部门的一个关键但被忽视的因素1

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103223
William F. Hyde , Virginia Morales Olmos
{"title":"总体政策的不确定性:林业部门的一个关键但被忽视的因素1","authors":"William F. Hyde ,&nbsp;Virginia Morales Olmos","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General policy uncertainty: A crucial, yet overlooked, factor for the forest sector1\",\"authors\":\"William F. Hyde ,&nbsp;Virginia Morales Olmos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意料之外的宏观经济影响和意料之外的行政行动,都是林业部门自身活动之外的因素,给林业部门的生产、增长和发展带来了至关重要的不确定性。它们是林业部门业绩的主要决定因素。然而,森林政策决策者却完全忽视了不确定性的来源。我们解释了非预期和外生活动两种变体的一般影响,然后首先用阿根廷的数据展示了宏观经济变体,并与阿根廷较为稳定的邻国形成对比:巴西、智利和乌拉圭。我们还对世界其他七个地区的国家进行了进一步的比较分析,尽管分析的细节较少,但却显示了每个地区内部的反差以及这种效应的普遍性。接下来,我们将介绍第二种变式--行政行为--在南亚、东南亚和东亚几个国家的效果,并以中国为例进行详细说明。最后,我们进行总结,然后提出为什么森林政策顾问们忽视了这两种形式的不确定性,以及作为经济学家和森林政策顾问的我们应该如何应对。在没有充分理解宏观经济和行政不确定性影响的情况下制定的森林政策注定会失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
General policy uncertainty: A crucial, yet overlooked, factor for the forest sector1

Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Reviewing factors that influence voluntary participation in conservation programs in Latin America Preliminary evidence of softwood shortage and hardwood availability in EU regions: A spatial analysis using the European Forest Industry Database How contracted tree farmers engage in and benefit from inclusive value chains: Evidence from Vietnam Outsourcing stumpage price uncertainty with American put option for active timber management1 Multiple crises as a policy window for forest and nature a power-analysis from Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1