{"title":"总体政策的不确定性:林业部门的一个关键但被忽视的因素1","authors":"William F. Hyde , Virginia Morales Olmos","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General policy uncertainty: A crucial, yet overlooked, factor for the forest sector1\",\"authors\":\"William F. Hyde , Virginia Morales Olmos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
General policy uncertainty: A crucial, yet overlooked, factor for the forest sector1
Unexpected macroeconomic effects and unanticipated administrative action, both external to the activities of the forest sector itself, create crucial uncertainty for production, growth, and development in the forest sector. They dominate as determinants of forest sector performance. Yet they are a source of uncertainty that has been entirely overlooked by forest policy decisionmakers. We explain the general effect of both variants of unanticipated and exogenous activity, then first demonstrate the macroeconomic variant with data from Argentina and the contrast with Argentina's more stable neighbors: Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Further comparative analyses, if with less detail, for countries in seven other regions of the world show the contrasts within each region and the generality of this effect. We continue, showing the effect of the second variant, administrative action, in several South, Southeast and East Asian countries, with greater detail in examples from China. In conclusion, we summarize and then suggest why this form of uncertainty, in both of its variants, has been overlooked by those who advise on forest policy and how we, as economists and forest policy advisors ourselves, should respond. Forest policy designed without full comprehension of the impact of macroeconomic and administrative uncertainty is destined to fail.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.