分析数字化教育对未来教育的影响:基于学生对教学数据评价的比较研究

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101359
Kingsley Okoye , Sandra Dennis Núñez Daruich , Raquel Castaño , José Francisco Enríquez de la O , Jose Escamilla , Samira Hosseini
{"title":"分析数字化教育对未来教育的影响:基于学生对教学数据评价的比较研究","authors":"Kingsley Okoye ,&nbsp;Sandra Dennis Núñez Daruich ,&nbsp;Raquel Castaño ,&nbsp;José Francisco Enríquez de la O ,&nbsp;Jose Escamilla ,&nbsp;Samira Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the key factors that impact the <em>digitalized-education</em>, and what those mean for the new and emerging educational models of learning. The research is based on state-of-the-art education and assessment models for learning such as Descriptive decision theory, Futures Literacy (FLF), and 8-Affordances framework that theoretically addresses both the need to use multidisciplinary components in identifying the several challenges and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education (digitized-education) and improvement of the student's learning outcomes. Through a quasi-experimental study design and comparative analysis of the students’ evaluation of teaching (SET) dataset (<em>n</em> = 3178) collected in a higher education setting; the study applies a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and multiple comparisons (post-hoc) tests to determine the impact or association that the evaluation period (between 2019–2021) and type of school or discipline have on the students’ learning performance and evaluation. The results show that students’ satisfaction and experiences with digitized-education have exponentially grown in recent times, and mainly varied across the years, and marginally by discipline or school. In addition, the study empirically sheds light on the importance of the key findings and results by considering their pedagogical, technological, economic infrastructure, and ethical implications for the future of education and sustainable educational practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the impact of digitized-education toward the future of education: A comparative study based on students’ evaluation of teaching data\",\"authors\":\"Kingsley Okoye ,&nbsp;Sandra Dennis Núñez Daruich ,&nbsp;Raquel Castaño ,&nbsp;José Francisco Enríquez de la O ,&nbsp;Jose Escamilla ,&nbsp;Samira Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the key factors that impact the <em>digitalized-education</em>, and what those mean for the new and emerging educational models of learning. The research is based on state-of-the-art education and assessment models for learning such as Descriptive decision theory, Futures Literacy (FLF), and 8-Affordances framework that theoretically addresses both the need to use multidisciplinary components in identifying the several challenges and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education (digitized-education) and improvement of the student's learning outcomes. Through a quasi-experimental study design and comparative analysis of the students’ evaluation of teaching (SET) dataset (<em>n</em> = 3178) collected in a higher education setting; the study applies a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and multiple comparisons (post-hoc) tests to determine the impact or association that the evaluation period (between 2019–2021) and type of school or discipline have on the students’ learning performance and evaluation. The results show that students’ satisfaction and experiences with digitized-education have exponentially grown in recent times, and mainly varied across the years, and marginally by discipline or school. In addition, the study empirically sheds light on the importance of the key findings and results by considering their pedagogical, technological, economic infrastructure, and ethical implications for the future of education and sustainable educational practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000385\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了影响数字化教育的关键因素,以及这些因素对新兴教育学习模式的意义。该研究基于最先进的教育和学习评估模型,如描述性决策理论、未来素养(FLF)和 8-Affordances 框架,从理论上解决了在确定教育(数字化教育)中使用数字技术所面临的挑战和机遇以及改善学生学习成果时需要使用多学科要素的问题。本研究采用准实验研究设计,通过对在高等教育环境中收集的学生教学评价(SET)数据集(n = 3178)进行比较分析,运用多元协方差分析(MANCOVA)和多重比较(事后)检验,确定评价周期(2019-2021年间)和学校或学科类型对学生学习成绩和评价的影响或关联。结果表明,学生对数字化教育的满意度和体验在近期呈指数级增长,且主要因年份而异,因学科或学校而略有不同。此外,研究还从教学、技术、经济基础和伦理等方面探讨了主要发现和结果对未来教育和可持续教育实践的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing the impact of digitized-education toward the future of education: A comparative study based on students’ evaluation of teaching data

This study investigates the key factors that impact the digitalized-education, and what those mean for the new and emerging educational models of learning. The research is based on state-of-the-art education and assessment models for learning such as Descriptive decision theory, Futures Literacy (FLF), and 8-Affordances framework that theoretically addresses both the need to use multidisciplinary components in identifying the several challenges and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education (digitized-education) and improvement of the student's learning outcomes. Through a quasi-experimental study design and comparative analysis of the students’ evaluation of teaching (SET) dataset (n = 3178) collected in a higher education setting; the study applies a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and multiple comparisons (post-hoc) tests to determine the impact or association that the evaluation period (between 2019–2021) and type of school or discipline have on the students’ learning performance and evaluation. The results show that students’ satisfaction and experiences with digitized-education have exponentially grown in recent times, and mainly varied across the years, and marginally by discipline or school. In addition, the study empirically sheds light on the importance of the key findings and results by considering their pedagogical, technological, economic infrastructure, and ethical implications for the future of education and sustainable educational practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Preservice teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development Assessment as learning: Evidence based on meta-analysis and quantitative ethnography research Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1