在儿童性虐待案件中刑事司法与儿童保护之间的合作:揭示阻碍和促进因素

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse Review Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1002/car.2868
Justine Eilfgang, Lennart Bayer, Maike Cigelski, Frieda Mensing, Isabelle von Seeler, Harriet Sewald, Simone Pülschen
{"title":"在儿童性虐待案件中刑事司法与儿童保护之间的合作:揭示阻碍和促进因素","authors":"Justine Eilfgang,&nbsp;Lennart Bayer,&nbsp;Maike Cigelski,&nbsp;Frieda Mensing,&nbsp;Isabelle von Seeler,&nbsp;Harriet Sewald,&nbsp;Simone Pülschen","doi":"10.1002/car.2868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Victims of child sexual abuse (CSA) in criminal proceedings face a range of stress factors. In response to this, collaboration between criminal justice and child protection professionals has been established both legally and informally, such as in the newly established Childhood Houses in Germany, which follow the model of the Scandinavian Barnahus to reduce stress and prevent revictimisation. This study intends to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors in the collaboration between the child protection and criminal justice systems in cases of CSA in Germany. Twenty-eight qualitative interviews with experts from child protection, like counselling centre employees (<i>n</i> = 5), psychosocial court supporters (<i>n</i> = 5) and youth welfare office workers (<i>n</i> = 5), and the criminal justice system, like prosecutors (<i>n</i> = 5), police officers (<i>n</i> = 5) and attorneys (<i>n</i> = 3). The interviews are structured by a questionnaire and analysed using Kuckartz's method of qualitative content analysis (QCA). Findings show that key factors like information flow, assessments of collaboration partners, uncertainties about laws and actors' perspectives on reporting and networking determine the success or failure of interagency collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/car.2868","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration between Criminal Justice and Child Protection in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse: Unveiling Inhibiting and Facilitating Factors\",\"authors\":\"Justine Eilfgang,&nbsp;Lennart Bayer,&nbsp;Maike Cigelski,&nbsp;Frieda Mensing,&nbsp;Isabelle von Seeler,&nbsp;Harriet Sewald,&nbsp;Simone Pülschen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/car.2868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Victims of child sexual abuse (CSA) in criminal proceedings face a range of stress factors. In response to this, collaboration between criminal justice and child protection professionals has been established both legally and informally, such as in the newly established Childhood Houses in Germany, which follow the model of the Scandinavian Barnahus to reduce stress and prevent revictimisation. This study intends to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors in the collaboration between the child protection and criminal justice systems in cases of CSA in Germany. Twenty-eight qualitative interviews with experts from child protection, like counselling centre employees (<i>n</i> = 5), psychosocial court supporters (<i>n</i> = 5) and youth welfare office workers (<i>n</i> = 5), and the criminal justice system, like prosecutors (<i>n</i> = 5), police officers (<i>n</i> = 5) and attorneys (<i>n</i> = 3). The interviews are structured by a questionnaire and analysed using Kuckartz's method of qualitative content analysis (QCA). Findings show that key factors like information flow, assessments of collaboration partners, uncertainties about laws and actors' perspectives on reporting and networking determine the success or failure of interagency collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/car.2868\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2868\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刑事诉讼中的儿童性虐待(CSA)受害者面临一系列压力因素。为此,刑事司法人员和儿童保护专业人员通过法律和非正式途径建立了合作关系,例如德国新成立的 "童年之家"(Childhood Houses)。本研究旨在确定德国儿童保护系统和刑事司法系统在 CSA 案件中合作的促进因素和抑制因素。本研究对儿童保护专家(如咨询中心员工(5 人)、社会心理法庭支持者(5 人)和青年福利办公室工作人员(5 人))和刑事司法系统(如检察官(5 人)、警官(5 人)和律师(3 人))进行了 28 次定性访谈。访谈以问卷调查的形式进行,并采用 Kuckartz 的定性内容分析法(QCA)进行分析。研究结果表明,信息流、对合作伙伴的评估、法律的不确定性以及参与者对报告和网络的看法等关键因素决定了机构间合作的成败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaboration between Criminal Justice and Child Protection in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse: Unveiling Inhibiting and Facilitating Factors

Victims of child sexual abuse (CSA) in criminal proceedings face a range of stress factors. In response to this, collaboration between criminal justice and child protection professionals has been established both legally and informally, such as in the newly established Childhood Houses in Germany, which follow the model of the Scandinavian Barnahus to reduce stress and prevent revictimisation. This study intends to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors in the collaboration between the child protection and criminal justice systems in cases of CSA in Germany. Twenty-eight qualitative interviews with experts from child protection, like counselling centre employees (n = 5), psychosocial court supporters (n = 5) and youth welfare office workers (n = 5), and the criminal justice system, like prosecutors (n = 5), police officers (n = 5) and attorneys (n = 3). The interviews are structured by a questionnaire and analysed using Kuckartz's method of qualitative content analysis (QCA). Findings show that key factors like information flow, assessments of collaboration partners, uncertainties about laws and actors' perspectives on reporting and networking determine the success or failure of interagency collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
期刊最新文献
An Investigation Into the Positive and Negative Outcomes for Clinicians Working With Child Survivors of Sexual Abuse Factors Related to Parents' Sensitivity to Violence Against Child in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study Issue Information Barnahus Is Coming: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of How Child Sexual Abuse Services at a Dublin Hospital Adapt and Respond Peer Victimization Among a Clinical Sample of Turkish Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1