推理混乱和自我恐惧对强迫症状心理模型的贡献:维度方法

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100875
Nicholas S. Myers , Emily K. Juel , Joseph B. Friedman , Heidi J. Ojalehto , Maya E. Tadross , Chase M. DuBois , Amitai Abramovitch , Dean McKay , Jonathan S. Abramowitz
{"title":"推理混乱和自我恐惧对强迫症状心理模型的贡献:维度方法","authors":"Nicholas S. Myers ,&nbsp;Emily K. Juel ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Friedman ,&nbsp;Heidi J. Ojalehto ,&nbsp;Maya E. Tadross ,&nbsp;Chase M. DuBois ,&nbsp;Amitai Abramovitch ,&nbsp;Dean McKay ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Abramowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current psychological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder account for a surprisingly small degree of variability in obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in statistical models. The current study examined whether constructs from the inference-based approach to OCD (i.e., inferential confusion and fear of self) explain OC symptom dimensions above and beyond what is explained by the prevailing cognitive appraisal model. Undergraduate participants (<em>N</em> = 339) completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing OC symptoms, obsessive beliefs, inferential confusion, and fear of self. Results revealed that both psychological models together accounted for about one quarter of the variance in OC symptoms. The inference-based approach concepts most closely aligned with responsibility, symmetry, and unacceptable thoughts, and added explanatory value to appraisal models of these symptom domains. Limitations and future directions are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The contribution of inferential confusion and fear of self to psychological models of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A dimensional approach\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas S. Myers ,&nbsp;Emily K. Juel ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Friedman ,&nbsp;Heidi J. Ojalehto ,&nbsp;Maya E. Tadross ,&nbsp;Chase M. DuBois ,&nbsp;Amitai Abramovitch ,&nbsp;Dean McKay ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Abramowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Current psychological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder account for a surprisingly small degree of variability in obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in statistical models. The current study examined whether constructs from the inference-based approach to OCD (i.e., inferential confusion and fear of self) explain OC symptom dimensions above and beyond what is explained by the prevailing cognitive appraisal model. Undergraduate participants (<em>N</em> = 339) completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing OC symptoms, obsessive beliefs, inferential confusion, and fear of self. Results revealed that both psychological models together accounted for about one quarter of the variance in OC symptoms. The inference-based approach concepts most closely aligned with responsibility, symmetry, and unacceptable thoughts, and added explanatory value to appraisal models of these symptom domains. Limitations and future directions are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000198\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000198","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的强迫症心理学模型在统计模型中对强迫症(OC)症状变异性的解释程度之小令人惊讶。本研究考察了基于推理的强迫症方法(即推理混乱和对自我的恐惧)中的建构物是否能解释超出主流认知评估模型所能解释的强迫症症状维度。本科生参与者(N = 339)完成了一系列自我报告问卷,评估强迫症症状、强迫观念、推理混乱和自我恐惧。结果显示,两种心理模型加在一起约占 OC 症状变异的四分之一。基于推理的方法概念与责任感、对称性和不可接受的想法最为接近,为这些症状领域的评估模型增加了解释价值。本文讨论了研究的局限性和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The contribution of inferential confusion and fear of self to psychological models of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A dimensional approach

Current psychological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder account for a surprisingly small degree of variability in obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in statistical models. The current study examined whether constructs from the inference-based approach to OCD (i.e., inferential confusion and fear of self) explain OC symptom dimensions above and beyond what is explained by the prevailing cognitive appraisal model. Undergraduate participants (N = 339) completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing OC symptoms, obsessive beliefs, inferential confusion, and fear of self. Results revealed that both psychological models together accounted for about one quarter of the variance in OC symptoms. The inference-based approach concepts most closely aligned with responsibility, symmetry, and unacceptable thoughts, and added explanatory value to appraisal models of these symptom domains. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1