{"title":"全球化对雨林退化重要吗?经济表现、森林转换和生物质消费之间的联系","authors":"Jonathan Bakadila Ngoma, Ling Yang","doi":"10.1561/112.00000574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientists clash over how globalization affects the environment, particularly forests. To fill this gap, we analyzed the impact of aggregated (globalization index as a whole) and disaggregated (economic, commercial, social, and political) globalization on forest conversion in 23 countries covering tropical forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia from 2000 to 2020. To achieve this, we used the GMM model and the sequential (two-step) estimation of the two-step GMM estimator of the linear panel data (SELPDM) as a robust test. According to the results of these econometric methodologies, a 1% increase in globalization (economic, commercial, social, and political globalization) will reduce forest conversion by 0.012 (0.011, 0.06, 0.04, 0.09) respectively, and a 1% increase in biomass and agricultural land. Population density and grain production will increase forest conversion by 0.059, 0.084, 0.038, 0.029, ceteris paribus. Furthermore, the findings support the N-shaped EKCd hypothesis between economic performance and forest conversion, and all these results were confirmed by SELPDM used as the robustness test. As a result, we proposed promoting more environmentally friendly forms of globalization, aiming for sustainable development without sacrificing ecosystem protection, and energy efficiency, particularly with the help of new environmentally friendly technologies, paving the way for even stronger economic growth and improved educational attainment in tandem with improved agricultural.</p>","PeriodicalId":54831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Globalization Matter for Rainforest Degradation? Nexus among Economic Performance, Forest Conversion and Biomass Consumption\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Bakadila Ngoma, Ling Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/112.00000574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Scientists clash over how globalization affects the environment, particularly forests. To fill this gap, we analyzed the impact of aggregated (globalization index as a whole) and disaggregated (economic, commercial, social, and political) globalization on forest conversion in 23 countries covering tropical forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia from 2000 to 2020. To achieve this, we used the GMM model and the sequential (two-step) estimation of the two-step GMM estimator of the linear panel data (SELPDM) as a robust test. According to the results of these econometric methodologies, a 1% increase in globalization (economic, commercial, social, and political globalization) will reduce forest conversion by 0.012 (0.011, 0.06, 0.04, 0.09) respectively, and a 1% increase in biomass and agricultural land. Population density and grain production will increase forest conversion by 0.059, 0.084, 0.038, 0.029, ceteris paribus. Furthermore, the findings support the N-shaped EKCd hypothesis between economic performance and forest conversion, and all these results were confirmed by SELPDM used as the robustness test. As a result, we proposed promoting more environmentally friendly forms of globalization, aiming for sustainable development without sacrificing ecosystem protection, and energy efficiency, particularly with the help of new environmentally friendly technologies, paving the way for even stronger economic growth and improved educational attainment in tandem with improved agricultural.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000574\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Globalization Matter for Rainforest Degradation? Nexus among Economic Performance, Forest Conversion and Biomass Consumption
Scientists clash over how globalization affects the environment, particularly forests. To fill this gap, we analyzed the impact of aggregated (globalization index as a whole) and disaggregated (economic, commercial, social, and political) globalization on forest conversion in 23 countries covering tropical forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia from 2000 to 2020. To achieve this, we used the GMM model and the sequential (two-step) estimation of the two-step GMM estimator of the linear panel data (SELPDM) as a robust test. According to the results of these econometric methodologies, a 1% increase in globalization (economic, commercial, social, and political globalization) will reduce forest conversion by 0.012 (0.011, 0.06, 0.04, 0.09) respectively, and a 1% increase in biomass and agricultural land. Population density and grain production will increase forest conversion by 0.059, 0.084, 0.038, 0.029, ceteris paribus. Furthermore, the findings support the N-shaped EKCd hypothesis between economic performance and forest conversion, and all these results were confirmed by SELPDM used as the robustness test. As a result, we proposed promoting more environmentally friendly forms of globalization, aiming for sustainable development without sacrificing ecosystem protection, and energy efficiency, particularly with the help of new environmentally friendly technologies, paving the way for even stronger economic growth and improved educational attainment in tandem with improved agricultural.
期刊介绍:
The journal covers all aspects of forest economics, and publishes scientific papers in subject areas such as the following:
forest management problems: economics of silviculture, forest regulation and operational activities, managerial economics;
forest industry analysis: economics of processing, industrial organization problems, demand and supply analysis, technological change, international trade of forest products;
multiple use of forests: valuation of non-market priced goods and services, cost-benefit analysis of environment and timber production, external effects of forestry and forest industry;
forest policy analysis: market and intervention failures, regulation of forest management, ownership, taxation;
land use and economic development: deforestation and land use problem, national resource accounting, contribution to national and regional income and employment.
forestry and climate change: using forestry to mitigate climate change, economic analysis of bioenergy, adaption of forestry to climate change.