栽培向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)对中度干旱胁迫的耐受性低于同种野生向日葵,但其基本特性仍然难以捉摸

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1002/pld3.581
Vivian H. Tran, Kristen M. Nolting, Lisa A. Donovan, Andries A. Temme
{"title":"栽培向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)对中度干旱胁迫的耐受性低于同种野生向日葵,但其基本特性仍然难以捉摸","authors":"Vivian H. Tran, Kristen M. Nolting, Lisa A. Donovan, Andries A. Temme","doi":"10.1002/pld3.581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultivated crops are generally expected to have less abiotic stress tolerance than their wild relatives. However, this assumption is not well supported by empirical literature and may depend on the type of stress and how it is imposed, as well as the measure of tolerance being used. Here, we investigated whether wild and cultivated accessions of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Helianthus annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> differed in stress tolerance assessed as proportional decline in biomass due to drought and whether wild and cultivated accessions differed in trait responses to drought and trait associations with tolerance. In a greenhouse study, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> accessions in the two domestication classes (eight cultivated and eight wild accessions) received two treatments: a well‐watered control and a moderate drought implemented as a dry down followed by maintenance at a predetermined soil moisture level with automated irrigation. Treatments were imposed at the seedling stage, and plants were harvested after 2 weeks of treatment. The proportional biomass decline in response to drought was 24% for cultivated <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> accessions but was not significant for the wild accessions. Thus, using the metric of proportional biomass decline, the cultivated accessions had less drought tolerance. Among accessions, there was no tradeoff between drought tolerance and vigor assessed as biomass in the control treatment. In a multivariate analysis, wild and cultivated accessions did not differ from each other or in response to drought for a subset of morphological, physiological, and allocational traits. Analyzed individually, traits varied in response to drought in wild and/or cultivated accessions, including declines in specific leaf area, leaf theoretical maximum stomatal conductance (g<jats:sub>smax</jats:sub>), and stomatal pore length, but there was no treatment response for stomatal density, succulence, or the ability to osmotically adjust. Focusing on traits associations with tolerance, plasticity in g<jats:sub>smax</jats:sub> was the most interesting because its association with tolerance differed by domestication class (although the effects were relatively weak) and thus might contribute to lower tolerance of cultivated sunflower. Our <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> results support the expectation that stress tolerance is lower in crops than wild relatives under some conditions. However, determining the key traits that underpin differences in moderate drought tolerance between wild and cultivated <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> remains elusive.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) has lower tolerance of moderate drought stress than its con‐specific wild relative, but the underlying traits remain elusive\",\"authors\":\"Vivian H. Tran, Kristen M. Nolting, Lisa A. Donovan, Andries A. Temme\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pld3.581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cultivated crops are generally expected to have less abiotic stress tolerance than their wild relatives. However, this assumption is not well supported by empirical literature and may depend on the type of stress and how it is imposed, as well as the measure of tolerance being used. Here, we investigated whether wild and cultivated accessions of <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>Helianthus annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> differed in stress tolerance assessed as proportional decline in biomass due to drought and whether wild and cultivated accessions differed in trait responses to drought and trait associations with tolerance. In a greenhouse study, <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> accessions in the two domestication classes (eight cultivated and eight wild accessions) received two treatments: a well‐watered control and a moderate drought implemented as a dry down followed by maintenance at a predetermined soil moisture level with automated irrigation. Treatments were imposed at the seedling stage, and plants were harvested after 2 weeks of treatment. The proportional biomass decline in response to drought was 24% for cultivated <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> accessions but was not significant for the wild accessions. Thus, using the metric of proportional biomass decline, the cultivated accessions had less drought tolerance. Among accessions, there was no tradeoff between drought tolerance and vigor assessed as biomass in the control treatment. In a multivariate analysis, wild and cultivated accessions did not differ from each other or in response to drought for a subset of morphological, physiological, and allocational traits. Analyzed individually, traits varied in response to drought in wild and/or cultivated accessions, including declines in specific leaf area, leaf theoretical maximum stomatal conductance (g<jats:sub>smax</jats:sub>), and stomatal pore length, but there was no treatment response for stomatal density, succulence, or the ability to osmotically adjust. Focusing on traits associations with tolerance, plasticity in g<jats:sub>smax</jats:sub> was the most interesting because its association with tolerance differed by domestication class (although the effects were relatively weak) and thus might contribute to lower tolerance of cultivated sunflower. Our <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> results support the expectation that stress tolerance is lower in crops than wild relatives under some conditions. However, determining the key traits that underpin differences in moderate drought tolerance between wild and cultivated <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>H. annuus</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> remains elusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般认为,与野生近缘植物相比,栽培作物对非生物胁迫的耐受力较弱。然而,这一假设并没有得到实证文献的充分支持,而且可能取决于胁迫的类型和施加方式,以及所使用的耐受性衡量标准。在此,我们研究了Helianthus annuus的野生和栽培品种在抗逆性方面是否存在差异,抗逆性是指干旱导致生物量下降的比例,以及野生和栽培品种在对干旱的性状反应和性状与抗逆性的关联方面是否存在差异。在一项温室研究中,两个驯化等级的鹅掌楸品种(8 个栽培品种和 8 个野生品种)接受了两种处理:水分充足的对照组和中度干旱组,中度干旱组是在干枯后通过自动灌溉将土壤水分维持在预定水平。处理在幼苗期进行,植物在处理两周后收获。栽培品种对干旱的生物量下降比例为 24%,而野生品种的下降比例并不明显。因此,用生物量下降比例来衡量,栽培品种的耐旱性较差。在对照处理中,耐旱性与以生物量评估的活力之间没有权衡。在多元分析中,野生品种和栽培品种在形态、生理和分配性状方面没有差异,对干旱的反应也没有差异。单独分析发现,野生和/或栽培品种的性状对干旱的反应各不相同,包括比叶面积、叶片理论最大气孔导度(gsmax)和气孔孔隙长度的下降,但气孔密度、多汁性或渗透调节能力没有处理反应。从性状与耐受性的关系来看,gsmax 的可塑性最令人感兴趣,因为它与耐受性的关系因驯化等级而异(尽管影响相对较弱),因此可能导致栽培向日葵的耐受性较低。我们对向日葵的研究结果表明,在某些条件下,农作物的抗逆性低于野生近缘植物。然而,确定野生向日葵和栽培向日葵之间中等耐旱性差异的关键性状仍是一个未知数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) has lower tolerance of moderate drought stress than its con‐specific wild relative, but the underlying traits remain elusive
Cultivated crops are generally expected to have less abiotic stress tolerance than their wild relatives. However, this assumption is not well supported by empirical literature and may depend on the type of stress and how it is imposed, as well as the measure of tolerance being used. Here, we investigated whether wild and cultivated accessions of Helianthus annuus differed in stress tolerance assessed as proportional decline in biomass due to drought and whether wild and cultivated accessions differed in trait responses to drought and trait associations with tolerance. In a greenhouse study, H. annuus accessions in the two domestication classes (eight cultivated and eight wild accessions) received two treatments: a well‐watered control and a moderate drought implemented as a dry down followed by maintenance at a predetermined soil moisture level with automated irrigation. Treatments were imposed at the seedling stage, and plants were harvested after 2 weeks of treatment. The proportional biomass decline in response to drought was 24% for cultivated H. annuus accessions but was not significant for the wild accessions. Thus, using the metric of proportional biomass decline, the cultivated accessions had less drought tolerance. Among accessions, there was no tradeoff between drought tolerance and vigor assessed as biomass in the control treatment. In a multivariate analysis, wild and cultivated accessions did not differ from each other or in response to drought for a subset of morphological, physiological, and allocational traits. Analyzed individually, traits varied in response to drought in wild and/or cultivated accessions, including declines in specific leaf area, leaf theoretical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax), and stomatal pore length, but there was no treatment response for stomatal density, succulence, or the ability to osmotically adjust. Focusing on traits associations with tolerance, plasticity in gsmax was the most interesting because its association with tolerance differed by domestication class (although the effects were relatively weak) and thus might contribute to lower tolerance of cultivated sunflower. Our H. annuus results support the expectation that stress tolerance is lower in crops than wild relatives under some conditions. However, determining the key traits that underpin differences in moderate drought tolerance between wild and cultivated H. annuus remains elusive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1