新的基龄不变遗址指数模型的相对准确性

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Forest Science Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1093/forestscience/40.2.341
Bijan Payandeh, Yonghe Wang
{"title":"新的基龄不变遗址指数模型的相对准确性","authors":"Bijan Payandeh, Yonghe Wang","doi":"10.1093/forestscience/40.2.341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new base-age invariant site index model was developed based on the constrained version of the Chapman-Richards function. It was compared with that of Goelz and Burk's (1992) in terms of relative accuracy and average bias across a range of potential base ages. The data format for fitting the above models was also simplified. Comparing the models on a set of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) stem analysis data indicated that the choice of predictor age influences the models' accuracy and bias. Except for very young ages, the new model performed as well as that Goelz and Burk's (1992) model in relative accuracy. For. Sci. 40(2):341-348.","PeriodicalId":12749,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Accuracy of a New Base-Age Invariant Site Index Model\",\"authors\":\"Bijan Payandeh, Yonghe Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forestscience/40.2.341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new base-age invariant site index model was developed based on the constrained version of the Chapman-Richards function. It was compared with that of Goelz and Burk's (1992) in terms of relative accuracy and average bias across a range of potential base ages. The data format for fitting the above models was also simplified. Comparing the models on a set of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) stem analysis data indicated that the choice of predictor age influences the models' accuracy and bias. Except for very young ages, the new model performed as well as that Goelz and Burk's (1992) model in relative accuracy. For. Sci. 40(2):341-348.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/40.2.341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/40.2.341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 Chapman-Richards 函数的约束版本,建立了一个新的基龄不变遗址指数模型。该模型与 Goelz 和 Burk(1992 年)的模型在一系列潜在基龄的相对准确性和平均偏差方面进行了比较。拟合上述模型的数据格式也进行了简化。在一组白云杉(Picea glauca [Moench] Voss)茎分析数据上比较这些模型表明,预测年龄的选择会影响模型的准确性和偏差。除了非常年轻的年龄外,新模型的相对准确性与 Goelz 和 Burk(1992 年)的模型相当。For.科学》40(2):341-348。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relative Accuracy of a New Base-Age Invariant Site Index Model
A new base-age invariant site index model was developed based on the constrained version of the Chapman-Richards function. It was compared with that of Goelz and Burk's (1992) in terms of relative accuracy and average bias across a range of potential base ages. The data format for fitting the above models was also simplified. Comparing the models on a set of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) stem analysis data indicated that the choice of predictor age influences the models' accuracy and bias. Except for very young ages, the new model performed as well as that Goelz and Burk's (1992) model in relative accuracy. For. Sci. 40(2):341-348.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Science
Forest Science 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management. Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Selective Postplanting Forb Control Increased Growth of Douglas-Fir but Not Western Larch Seedlings in Idaho Accuracy of Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Identification by Forest Inventory and Analysis Field Crews Applying Ratio-of-Means Estimation for Annualized Components of Volume Change in Forest Resource Monitoring Genetic Variability for Clonal Propagation of Acacia mearnsii Whole-Tree Green Density Equations for Loblolly and Slash Pine Trees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1