毫无根据的信念、痛苦和无力感:三波纵向研究

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1111/aphw.12542
Eva Ballová Mikušková, Peter Teličák
{"title":"毫无根据的信念、痛苦和无力感:三波纵向研究","authors":"Eva Ballová Mikušková, Peter Teličák","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between unfounded C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 beliefs and distress and powerlessness, specifically, whether distress and powerlessness are causes or consequences of unfounded C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 beliefs represented by conspiracy beliefs and pseudoscientific beliefs regarding treatment and measures. Unfounded beliefs were assessed using the C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 Unfounded Beliefs Scale; distress was measured with the Symptom Checklist‐10, and powerlessness was measured with four items measuring the feeling of losing control. Data collection took place during three phases of the pandemic in Slovakia (October 2021, N = 1838; July 2022, N = 1,420; April 2023, N = 925). Results suggest that individuals with stronger unfounded beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 reported greater powerlessness longitudinally, and individuals with stronger C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 unfounded beliefs treatment and measures reported greater distress longitudinally (notably, beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 measures in the first wave were associated with distress in the second wave, and beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 treatment in the second wave were associated with distress in the third wave). The present findings corroborate an existential threat model of conspiracy theories that says the relationship between unfounded beliefs and indicators of well‐being is bidirectional, so interventions should be focused both on eliminating the unfounded beliefs and strengthening well‐being.","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfounded beliefs, distress and powerlessness: A three‐wave longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Eva Ballová Mikušková, Peter Teličák\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aphw.12542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between unfounded C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 beliefs and distress and powerlessness, specifically, whether distress and powerlessness are causes or consequences of unfounded C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 beliefs represented by conspiracy beliefs and pseudoscientific beliefs regarding treatment and measures. Unfounded beliefs were assessed using the C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 Unfounded Beliefs Scale; distress was measured with the Symptom Checklist‐10, and powerlessness was measured with four items measuring the feeling of losing control. Data collection took place during three phases of the pandemic in Slovakia (October 2021, N = 1838; July 2022, N = 1,420; April 2023, N = 925). Results suggest that individuals with stronger unfounded beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 reported greater powerlessness longitudinally, and individuals with stronger C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 unfounded beliefs treatment and measures reported greater distress longitudinally (notably, beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 measures in the first wave were associated with distress in the second wave, and beliefs about C<jats:sc>OVID</jats:sc>‐19 treatment in the second wave were associated with distress in the third wave). The present findings corroborate an existential threat model of conspiracy theories that says the relationship between unfounded beliefs and indicators of well‐being is bidirectional, so interventions should be focused both on eliminating the unfounded beliefs and strengthening well‐being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12542\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨无根据的 COVID-19 信念与痛苦和无力感之间的关系,特别是痛苦和无力感是以阴谋论信念和有关治疗和措施的伪科学信念为代表的无根据的 COVID-19 信念的原因还是后果。无根据信念采用 COVID-19 无根据信念量表进行评估;痛苦采用症状检查表-10 进行测量,无力感采用四个测量失控感的项目进行测量。数据收集工作在斯洛伐克大流行病的三个阶段进行(2021 年 10 月,1,838 人;2022 年 7 月,1,420 人;2023 年 4 月,925 人)。结果表明,对 COVID-19 的无根据信念较强的个体纵向报告了更大的无力感,对 COVID-19 的无根据信念较强的治疗和措施个体纵向报告了更大的痛苦(值得注意的是,第一波中对 COVID-19 措施的信念与第二波中的痛苦相关,第二波中对 COVID-19 治疗的信念与第三波中的痛苦相关)。本研究结果证实了阴谋论的生存威胁模型,即毫无根据的信念与幸福感指标之间的关系是双向的,因此干预措施既要注重消除毫无根据的信念,也要注重增强幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unfounded beliefs, distress and powerlessness: A three‐wave longitudinal study
The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between unfounded COVID‐19 beliefs and distress and powerlessness, specifically, whether distress and powerlessness are causes or consequences of unfounded COVID‐19 beliefs represented by conspiracy beliefs and pseudoscientific beliefs regarding treatment and measures. Unfounded beliefs were assessed using the COVID‐19 Unfounded Beliefs Scale; distress was measured with the Symptom Checklist‐10, and powerlessness was measured with four items measuring the feeling of losing control. Data collection took place during three phases of the pandemic in Slovakia (October 2021, N = 1838; July 2022, N = 1,420; April 2023, N = 925). Results suggest that individuals with stronger unfounded beliefs about COVID‐19 reported greater powerlessness longitudinally, and individuals with stronger COVID‐19 unfounded beliefs treatment and measures reported greater distress longitudinally (notably, beliefs about COVID‐19 measures in the first wave were associated with distress in the second wave, and beliefs about COVID‐19 treatment in the second wave were associated with distress in the third wave). The present findings corroborate an existential threat model of conspiracy theories that says the relationship between unfounded beliefs and indicators of well‐being is bidirectional, so interventions should be focused both on eliminating the unfounded beliefs and strengthening well‐being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Daily relationship satisfaction and markers of health: Findings from a smartphone-based assessment. Evaluation of a meaning in life intervention applied to work: A randomized clinical trial. Applying machine learning to understand the role of social-emotional skills on subjective well-being and physical health. Subjective well-being of children with special educational needs: Longitudinal predictors using machine learning. Increasing student well-being through a positive psychology intervention: changes in salivary cortisol, depression, psychological well-being, and hope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1