机器人与再生产:欧洲自动化、贸易与就业比较研究

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Industrial and Corporate Change Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1093/icc/dtae012
Chinchih Chen, Carl Benedikt Frey
{"title":"机器人与再生产:欧洲自动化、贸易与就业比较研究","authors":"Chinchih Chen, Carl Benedikt Frey","doi":"10.1093/icc/dtae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper constitutes a comparative assessment of the impact of robots on local labor markets across eight European countries. Doing so, we find that robots generally reduce employment in the manufacturing sector, while their impacts on total employment are more ambiguous. Though local markets experienced significant employment losses in Italy, Norway, and the United Kingdom, we find no statistically significant impact of robots on employment in Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Spain. Job losses were seemingly offset by employment gains in other sectors of the economy. We explore two mechanisms that might explain these patterns: differences in investment in complementary job-creating technologies and robot-induced reshoring. Our analysis provides some support for both mechanisms in elucidating the differential impacts of robots on jobs across space.","PeriodicalId":48243,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Corporate Change","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robots and reshoring: a comparative study of automation, trade, and employment in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Chinchih Chen, Carl Benedikt Frey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icc/dtae012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper constitutes a comparative assessment of the impact of robots on local labor markets across eight European countries. Doing so, we find that robots generally reduce employment in the manufacturing sector, while their impacts on total employment are more ambiguous. Though local markets experienced significant employment losses in Italy, Norway, and the United Kingdom, we find no statistically significant impact of robots on employment in Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Spain. Job losses were seemingly offset by employment gains in other sectors of the economy. We explore two mechanisms that might explain these patterns: differences in investment in complementary job-creating technologies and robot-induced reshoring. Our analysis provides some support for both mechanisms in elucidating the differential impacts of robots on jobs across space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Corporate Change\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Corporate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Corporate Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对八个欧洲国家的机器人对当地劳动力市场的影响进行了比较评估。在评估过程中,我们发现机器人普遍减少了制造业的就业人数,而对总就业人数的影响则较为模糊。虽然在意大利、挪威和英国,当地市场经历了显著的就业损失,但我们发现在德国、瑞典、丹麦、芬兰和西班牙,机器人对就业没有统计上的显著影响。就业机会的损失似乎被其他经济部门就业机会的增加所抵消。我们探讨了可能解释这些模式的两种机制:在创造就业的互补技术方面的投资差异和机器人引发的再生产。我们的分析为这两种机制提供了一些支持,以阐明机器人在不同空间对就业的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robots and reshoring: a comparative study of automation, trade, and employment in Europe
This paper constitutes a comparative assessment of the impact of robots on local labor markets across eight European countries. Doing so, we find that robots generally reduce employment in the manufacturing sector, while their impacts on total employment are more ambiguous. Though local markets experienced significant employment losses in Italy, Norway, and the United Kingdom, we find no statistically significant impact of robots on employment in Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Spain. Job losses were seemingly offset by employment gains in other sectors of the economy. We explore two mechanisms that might explain these patterns: differences in investment in complementary job-creating technologies and robot-induced reshoring. Our analysis provides some support for both mechanisms in elucidating the differential impacts of robots on jobs across space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The journal covers the following: the internal structures of firms; the history of technologies; the evolution of industries; the nature of competition; the decision rules and strategies; the relationship between firms" characteristics and the institutional environment; the sociology of management and of the workforce; the performance of industries over time; the labour process and the organization of production; the relationship between, and boundaries of, organizations and markets; the nature of the learning process underlying technological and organizational change.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge-based approaches to the firm: an idea-driven perspective Homeowners’ financial vulnerability over the house price cycle How heuristic pricing shapes the aggregate market: the “Cheap Twin Paradox” Beyond trading: knowledge spillovers and learning-by-exporting in global value chains Export performance, innovation, and sectoral efficiency: a multilevel model for Argentinian manufacturing firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1