测定婴儿配方食品中的β-半乳寡糖(GOS):合作研究,最终行动 2021.01

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of AOAC International Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1093/jaoacint/qsae031
Denis Cuany, Sean Austin
{"title":"测定婴儿配方食品中的β-半乳寡糖(GOS):合作研究,最终行动 2021.01","authors":"Denis Cuany, Sean Austin","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background We previously published a method for the determination of β-Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) in Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals which is currently First Action AOAC Method 2021.01. In this study, reproducibility data were collected to support the promotion of the method to Final Action. Method A collaborative study was organized, to which 14 laboratories from eight different countries participated. Initially, laboratories were requested to analyze two practice samples and request guidance from the study director in case of issues. Successful laboratories proceeded to analyze seven samples (six infant formula and one adult nutritional) received as blind duplicates. Results Thirteen laboratories reported acceptable results for practice sample 1. Practice sample 2 could only be delivered to eight of the laboratories due to restrictions at customs. The 13 laboratories successfully analyzing practice sample 1 were requested to continue with the analysis of the MLT samples. Laboratory 14 was unable to solve some technical difficulties, so their data could not be used. Out of the seven samples tested, results for six infant formula met the requirements of the AOAC SMPR 2014.003, with RSDr ranging from 1.4 to 4.7% and RSDR ranging from 8.1 to 11.6%. The adult nutritional sample returned results outside the range of SPMR, having repeatability (RSDr) of 9.9%, higher than the SMPR target of ≤ 6%, and reproducibility (RSDR) of 12.1%, just above the SMPR target of ≤ 12%.","PeriodicalId":15003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of β-Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) in Infant Formula: Collaborative Study, Final Action 2021.01\",\"authors\":\"Denis Cuany, Sean Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background We previously published a method for the determination of β-Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) in Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals which is currently First Action AOAC Method 2021.01. In this study, reproducibility data were collected to support the promotion of the method to Final Action. Method A collaborative study was organized, to which 14 laboratories from eight different countries participated. Initially, laboratories were requested to analyze two practice samples and request guidance from the study director in case of issues. Successful laboratories proceeded to analyze seven samples (six infant formula and one adult nutritional) received as blind duplicates. Results Thirteen laboratories reported acceptable results for practice sample 1. Practice sample 2 could only be delivered to eight of the laboratories due to restrictions at customs. The 13 laboratories successfully analyzing practice sample 1 were requested to continue with the analysis of the MLT samples. Laboratory 14 was unable to solve some technical difficulties, so their data could not be used. Out of the seven samples tested, results for six infant formula met the requirements of the AOAC SMPR 2014.003, with RSDr ranging from 1.4 to 4.7% and RSDR ranging from 8.1 to 11.6%. The adult nutritional sample returned results outside the range of SPMR, having repeatability (RSDr) of 9.9%, higher than the SMPR target of ≤ 6%, and reproducibility (RSDR) of 12.1%, just above the SMPR target of ≤ 12%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 我们曾发布过一种测定婴儿配方奶粉和成人营养品中 β-半乳寡糖 (GOS) 的方法,该方法目前是 AOAC 方法 2021.01 的首次行动。本研究收集了重现性数据,以支持将该方法提升为最终行动方法。方法 组织了一项合作研究,有来自 8 个不同国家的 14 个实验室参加。起初,要求实验室分析两个实践样本,并在出现问题时请求研究主任的指导。成功的实验室接着分析了作为盲样收到的 7 份样品(6 份婴儿配方奶粉和 1 份成人营养品)。结果 13 个实验室报告了实践样本 1 的合格结果。由于海关的限制,实践样本 2 只能送到其中 8 个实验室。成功分析了练习样本 1 的 13 个实验室被要求继续分析多 重检测样本。第 14 实验室无法解决一些技术问题,因此无法使用其数据。在检测的 7 个样品中,6 个婴儿配方奶粉的结果符合 AOAC SMPR 2014.003 的要求,RSDr 为 1.4%至 4.7%,RSDR 为 8.1%至 11.6%。成人营养样品的结果超出了 SPMR 的范围,重复性(RSDr)为 9.9%,高于 SMPR ≤ 6% 的目标值,再现性(RSDR)为 12.1%,略高于 SMPR ≤ 12% 的目标值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of β-Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) in Infant Formula: Collaborative Study, Final Action 2021.01
Background We previously published a method for the determination of β-Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) in Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals which is currently First Action AOAC Method 2021.01. In this study, reproducibility data were collected to support the promotion of the method to Final Action. Method A collaborative study was organized, to which 14 laboratories from eight different countries participated. Initially, laboratories were requested to analyze two practice samples and request guidance from the study director in case of issues. Successful laboratories proceeded to analyze seven samples (six infant formula and one adult nutritional) received as blind duplicates. Results Thirteen laboratories reported acceptable results for practice sample 1. Practice sample 2 could only be delivered to eight of the laboratories due to restrictions at customs. The 13 laboratories successfully analyzing practice sample 1 were requested to continue with the analysis of the MLT samples. Laboratory 14 was unable to solve some technical difficulties, so their data could not be used. Out of the seven samples tested, results for six infant formula met the requirements of the AOAC SMPR 2014.003, with RSDr ranging from 1.4 to 4.7% and RSDR ranging from 8.1 to 11.6%. The adult nutritional sample returned results outside the range of SPMR, having repeatability (RSDr) of 9.9%, higher than the SMPR target of ≤ 6%, and reproducibility (RSDR) of 12.1%, just above the SMPR target of ≤ 12%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of AOAC International
Journal of AOAC International 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
144
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL publishes the latest in basic and applied research in analytical sciences related to foods, drugs, agriculture, the environment, and more. The Journal is the method researchers'' forum for exchanging information and keeping informed of new technology and techniques pertinent to regulatory agencies and regulated industries.
期刊最新文献
Bacterial Inactivation Studies in Shrimp Pond Water by using Different Disinfectant Agents Ivermectin-based products in the context of green pharmaceutical analysis Comparison of Roka Atlas® System Performance and Health Canada Reference Method for Listeria Detection from Plastic, Sealed Concrete, and Stainless Steel Surface Samples Determination of Aloin A, Aloin B, and Aloe-Emodin in Raw Materials and Finished Products Using HPLC Multi-Laboratory Validation Study, AOAC 2016.09, Final Action Status Effects of a Violence Prevention Education Program Using Empathy (VPEP-E) on Fifth-Grade Students in South Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1