细胞播种技术在骨再生体外区域基因治疗模型中的体内效应

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.37718
Jennifer A. Bell, Cory K. Mayfield, Kevin Collon, Stephanie Chang, Matthew C. Gallo, Elizabeth Lechtholz-Zey, Mina Ayad, Osamu Sugiyam, Amy H. Tang, Sang-Hyun Park, Jay R. Lieberman
{"title":"细胞播种技术在骨再生体外区域基因治疗模型中的体内效应","authors":"Jennifer A. Bell,&nbsp;Cory K. Mayfield,&nbsp;Kevin Collon,&nbsp;Stephanie Chang,&nbsp;Matthew C. Gallo,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lechtholz-Zey,&nbsp;Mina Ayad,&nbsp;Osamu Sugiyam,&nbsp;Amy H. Tang,&nbsp;Sang-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Jay R. Lieberman","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When delivering cells on a scaffold to treat a bone defect, the cell seeding technique determines the number and distribution of cells within a scaffold, however the optimal technique has not been established. This study investigated if human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) transduced with a lentiviral vector to overexpress bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and loaded on a scaffold using dynamic orbital shaker could reduce the total cell dose required to heal a critical sized bone defect when compared with static seeding. Human ASCs were loaded onto a collagen/biphasic ceramic scaffold using static loading and dynamic orbital shaker techniques, compared with our labs standard loading technique, and implanted into femoral defects of nude rats. Both a low dose and standard dose of transduced cells were evaluated. Outcomes investigated included BMP-2 production, radiographic healing, micro-computerized tomography, histologic assessment, and biomechanical torsional testing. BMP-2 production was higher in the orbital shaker cohort compared with the static seeding cohort. No statistically significant differences were noted in radiographic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical outcomes between the low-dose static and dynamic seeding groups, however the standard-dose static seeding cohort had superior biomechanical properties. The standard-dose 5 million cell dose standard loading cohort had superior maximum torque and torsional stiffness on biomechanical testing. The use of orbital shaker technique was labor intensive and did not provide equivalent biomechanical results with the use of fewer cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"112 10","pages":"1688-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo effects of cell seeding technique in an ex vivo regional gene therapy model for bone regeneration\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A. Bell,&nbsp;Cory K. Mayfield,&nbsp;Kevin Collon,&nbsp;Stephanie Chang,&nbsp;Matthew C. Gallo,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lechtholz-Zey,&nbsp;Mina Ayad,&nbsp;Osamu Sugiyam,&nbsp;Amy H. Tang,&nbsp;Sang-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Jay R. Lieberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm.a.37718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>When delivering cells on a scaffold to treat a bone defect, the cell seeding technique determines the number and distribution of cells within a scaffold, however the optimal technique has not been established. This study investigated if human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) transduced with a lentiviral vector to overexpress bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and loaded on a scaffold using dynamic orbital shaker could reduce the total cell dose required to heal a critical sized bone defect when compared with static seeding. Human ASCs were loaded onto a collagen/biphasic ceramic scaffold using static loading and dynamic orbital shaker techniques, compared with our labs standard loading technique, and implanted into femoral defects of nude rats. Both a low dose and standard dose of transduced cells were evaluated. Outcomes investigated included BMP-2 production, radiographic healing, micro-computerized tomography, histologic assessment, and biomechanical torsional testing. BMP-2 production was higher in the orbital shaker cohort compared with the static seeding cohort. No statistically significant differences were noted in radiographic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical outcomes between the low-dose static and dynamic seeding groups, however the standard-dose static seeding cohort had superior biomechanical properties. The standard-dose 5 million cell dose standard loading cohort had superior maximum torque and torsional stiffness on biomechanical testing. The use of orbital shaker technique was labor intensive and did not provide equivalent biomechanical results with the use of fewer cells.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A\",\"volume\":\"112 10\",\"pages\":\"1688-1698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37718\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在支架上输送细胞以治疗骨缺损时,细胞播种技术决定了支架内细胞的数量和分布,但最佳技术尚未确定。本研究调查了用慢病毒载体转导的人脂肪源性干细胞(ASCs)是否能过表达骨形态发生蛋白2(BMP-2),并用动态轨道振动器将其装载到支架上,与静态播种相比,是否能减少愈合临界大小骨缺损所需的细胞总剂量。利用静态加载和动态轨道振动技术将人类间充质干细胞加载到胶原/双相陶瓷支架上,并与本实验室的标准加载技术进行比较,然后将其植入裸鼠的股骨缺损处。我们对低剂量和标准剂量的转导细胞进行了评估。研究结果包括 BMP-2 生成、放射愈合、微型计算机断层扫描、组织学评估和生物力学扭转测试。与静态播种组相比,轨道振动器组的 BMP-2 产量更高。低剂量静态播种组和动态播种组在放射学、组织形态学和生物力学结果方面没有明显的统计学差异,但标准剂量静态播种组的生物力学特性更优。在生物力学测试中,标准剂量的 500 万细胞剂量标准加载组的最大扭矩和扭转刚度更胜一筹。使用轨道振动器技术需要耗费大量人力物力,而且使用较少的细胞也无法获得同等的生物力学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vivo effects of cell seeding technique in an ex vivo regional gene therapy model for bone regeneration

When delivering cells on a scaffold to treat a bone defect, the cell seeding technique determines the number and distribution of cells within a scaffold, however the optimal technique has not been established. This study investigated if human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) transduced with a lentiviral vector to overexpress bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and loaded on a scaffold using dynamic orbital shaker could reduce the total cell dose required to heal a critical sized bone defect when compared with static seeding. Human ASCs were loaded onto a collagen/biphasic ceramic scaffold using static loading and dynamic orbital shaker techniques, compared with our labs standard loading technique, and implanted into femoral defects of nude rats. Both a low dose and standard dose of transduced cells were evaluated. Outcomes investigated included BMP-2 production, radiographic healing, micro-computerized tomography, histologic assessment, and biomechanical torsional testing. BMP-2 production was higher in the orbital shaker cohort compared with the static seeding cohort. No statistically significant differences were noted in radiographic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical outcomes between the low-dose static and dynamic seeding groups, however the standard-dose static seeding cohort had superior biomechanical properties. The standard-dose 5 million cell dose standard loading cohort had superior maximum torque and torsional stiffness on biomechanical testing. The use of orbital shaker technique was labor intensive and did not provide equivalent biomechanical results with the use of fewer cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device. The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.
期刊最新文献
Soluble Proteins From Conventional and Organic Eggshell Membranes With Different Proteomic Profiles Show Similar In Vitro Biofunctions Dextran Sulfate-Modified and pH-Responsive Nanoprobes for Magnetic Resonance/Fluorescence Dual-Modality Imaging of Vulnerable Plaques Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Structural, Chemical, Bioactivity and Biocompatibility Characteristics of Bioactive Glass–Polymer Composite Film Injectable Nano-Micron AKBA Delivery Platform for Treatment of Tendinopathy in a Rat Model Tuning Surface Chemistry Impacts on Cardiac Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cell Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1