Jan Philipp Czakert, David Leiva Ureña, Rita Gisela Berger
{"title":"变革型领导如何通过工作参与影响下班后个人日常能量资源的恢复:基于资源和需求的途径","authors":"Jan Philipp Czakert, David Leiva Ureña, Rita Gisela Berger","doi":"10.1017/sjp.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship by investigating resource and demand pathways for daily off-work recovery and employee wellbeing (EWB). While previous research highlighted how transformational leadership energizes employees to engage at work, energy is a finite resource requiring daily restoration for EWB. Yet, how the leader’s energizing effect relates to daily employees’ recovery remains unknown. Following job demands-resource-recovery theory, we test two pathways that relate the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship to daily employee recovery: (a) Resource-based via resource-building, (b) demand-based via increased demands. Utilizing a 10-day, two daily measurement (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 88) study, multilevel path analyses revealed: transformational leadership predicted via work engagement (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .17, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05) role clarity (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .56, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), then positive (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .39, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), and negative work-nonwork spillover (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.38, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01). Positive work-nonwork spillover predicted recovery positively (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .25, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), negative work-nonwork spillover negatively (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.40, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01). Recovery predicted EWB for positive (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .38, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) and for negative (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.43, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) affect. Work engagement predicted workload (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .35, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), further negative (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .33, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) and positive work-nonwork spillover (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.16, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), hampering EWB. As one pathway effect might cancel the other, the main effect of transformational leadership on EWB was not significant in the integrative model (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > .05). Results highlight dark and bright sides of the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship regarding daily recovery.","PeriodicalId":517376,"journal":{"name":"The Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Transformational Leadership Affects the Off-work Recovery of Daily Personal Energy Resources via Work Engagement: Resource and Demand-based Pathways\",\"authors\":\"Jan Philipp Czakert, David Leiva Ureña, Rita Gisela Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/sjp.2024.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship by investigating resource and demand pathways for daily off-work recovery and employee wellbeing (EWB). While previous research highlighted how transformational leadership energizes employees to engage at work, energy is a finite resource requiring daily restoration for EWB. Yet, how the leader’s energizing effect relates to daily employees’ recovery remains unknown. Following job demands-resource-recovery theory, we test two pathways that relate the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship to daily employee recovery: (a) Resource-based via resource-building, (b) demand-based via increased demands. Utilizing a 10-day, two daily measurement (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 88) study, multilevel path analyses revealed: transformational leadership predicted via work engagement (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .17, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05) role clarity (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .56, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), then positive (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .39, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), and negative work-nonwork spillover (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.38, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01). Positive work-nonwork spillover predicted recovery positively (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .25, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), negative work-nonwork spillover negatively (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.40, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01). Recovery predicted EWB for positive (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .38, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) and for negative (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.43, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) affect. Work engagement predicted workload (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .35, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), further negative (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = .33, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01) and positive work-nonwork spillover (<jats:italic>b</jats:italic> = –.16, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .01), hampering EWB. As one pathway effect might cancel the other, the main effect of transformational leadership on EWB was not significant in the integrative model (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > .05). Results highlight dark and bright sides of the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship regarding daily recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2024.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2024.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Transformational Leadership Affects the Off-work Recovery of Daily Personal Energy Resources via Work Engagement: Resource and Demand-based Pathways
This study focuses on the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship by investigating resource and demand pathways for daily off-work recovery and employee wellbeing (EWB). While previous research highlighted how transformational leadership energizes employees to engage at work, energy is a finite resource requiring daily restoration for EWB. Yet, how the leader’s energizing effect relates to daily employees’ recovery remains unknown. Following job demands-resource-recovery theory, we test two pathways that relate the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship to daily employee recovery: (a) Resource-based via resource-building, (b) demand-based via increased demands. Utilizing a 10-day, two daily measurement (N = 88) study, multilevel path analyses revealed: transformational leadership predicted via work engagement (b = .17, p < .05) role clarity (b = .56, p < .01), then positive (b = .39, p < .01), and negative work-nonwork spillover (b = –.38, p < .01). Positive work-nonwork spillover predicted recovery positively (b = .25, p < .01), negative work-nonwork spillover negatively (b = –.40, p < .01). Recovery predicted EWB for positive (b = .38, p < .01) and for negative (b = –.43, p < .01) affect. Work engagement predicted workload (b = .35, p < .01), further negative (b = .33, p < .01) and positive work-nonwork spillover (b = –.16, p < .01), hampering EWB. As one pathway effect might cancel the other, the main effect of transformational leadership on EWB was not significant in the integrative model (p > .05). Results highlight dark and bright sides of the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship regarding daily recovery.