Kaitlin N. S. Newhouse, Kathleen J. Lehman, Annie M. Wofford, Michelle Sendowski
{"title":"在本科生计算机学习中实践和定义跨学科性","authors":"Kaitlin N. S. Newhouse, Kathleen J. Lehman, Annie M. Wofford, Michelle Sendowski","doi":"10.1145/3654676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interdisciplinarity has been touted as a means to recruit more racially and gender diverse students to computing. In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, we investigated demographic characteristics among a sample of undergraduate students pursuing interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations at 15 institutions in the United States who completed a survey at the end of their introductory course. Descriptive analyses of responses to this survey of introductory computing students revealed that enrollment in interdisciplinary combinations was limited and did not appear to disproportionately attract women or Black/African American, Latine, Indigenous, and Multiracial students. We then conducted a directed content analysis of departmental websites to examine the language and policies that may preclude or encourage students to pursue interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations. Findings revealed that departmental offerings of such programs were limited, and, among those that did offer such programs, communication about their goals and requirements was often lacking. Implications for research and practice, especially as they pertain to efforts to broaden participation in computing, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing and Defining Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate Computing\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin N. S. Newhouse, Kathleen J. Lehman, Annie M. Wofford, Michelle Sendowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3654676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interdisciplinarity has been touted as a means to recruit more racially and gender diverse students to computing. In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, we investigated demographic characteristics among a sample of undergraduate students pursuing interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations at 15 institutions in the United States who completed a survey at the end of their introductory course. Descriptive analyses of responses to this survey of introductory computing students revealed that enrollment in interdisciplinary combinations was limited and did not appear to disproportionately attract women or Black/African American, Latine, Indigenous, and Multiracial students. We then conducted a directed content analysis of departmental websites to examine the language and policies that may preclude or encourage students to pursue interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations. Findings revealed that departmental offerings of such programs were limited, and, among those that did offer such programs, communication about their goals and requirements was often lacking. Implications for research and practice, especially as they pertain to efforts to broaden participation in computing, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3654676\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3654676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Doing and Defining Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate Computing
Interdisciplinarity has been touted as a means to recruit more racially and gender diverse students to computing. In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, we investigated demographic characteristics among a sample of undergraduate students pursuing interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations at 15 institutions in the United States who completed a survey at the end of their introductory course. Descriptive analyses of responses to this survey of introductory computing students revealed that enrollment in interdisciplinary combinations was limited and did not appear to disproportionately attract women or Black/African American, Latine, Indigenous, and Multiracial students. We then conducted a directed content analysis of departmental websites to examine the language and policies that may preclude or encourage students to pursue interdisciplinary computing major and minor combinations. Findings revealed that departmental offerings of such programs were limited, and, among those that did offer such programs, communication about their goals and requirements was often lacking. Implications for research and practice, especially as they pertain to efforts to broaden participation in computing, are discussed.
期刊介绍:
ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (formerly named JERIC, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing) covers diverse aspects of computing education: traditional computer science, computer engineering, information technology, and informatics; emerging aspects of computing; and applications of computing to other disciplines. The common characteristics shared by these papers are a scholarly approach to teaching and learning, a broad appeal to educational practitioners, and a clear connection to student learning.