类风湿性关节炎患者使用托法替尼与 TNF 抑制剂发生重大不良心血管事件终点的风险:对 3b/4 期随机安全性研究的事后分析

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY RMD Open Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003912
Maya H Buch, Deepak L Bhatt, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Jon T Giles, Ted Mikuls, Gary G Koch, Steven Ytterberg, Edward Nagy, Hyejin Jo, Kenneth Kwok, Carol A Connell, Karim Richard Masri, Arne Yndestad
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎患者使用托法替尼与 TNF 抑制剂发生重大不良心血管事件终点的风险:对 3b/4 期随机安全性研究的事后分析","authors":"Maya H Buch, Deepak L Bhatt, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Jon T Giles, Ted Mikuls, Gary G Koch, Steven Ytterberg, Edward Nagy, Hyejin Jo, Kenneth Kwok, Carol A Connell, Karim Richard Masri, Arne Yndestad","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance. Methods Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components. Results HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years. Conclusion In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE. Trial registration number [NCT02092467][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual de-identified participant data.See <https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results> for more information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02092467&atom=%2Frmdopen%2F10%2F2%2Fe003912.atom","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study\",\"authors\":\"Maya H Buch, Deepak L Bhatt, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Jon T Giles, Ted Mikuls, Gary G Koch, Steven Ytterberg, Edward Nagy, Hyejin Jo, Kenneth Kwok, Carol A Connell, Karim Richard Masri, Arne Yndestad\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance. Methods Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components. Results HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years. Conclusion In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE. Trial registration number [NCT02092467][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual de-identified participant data.See <https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results> for more information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02092467&atom=%2Frmdopen%2F10%2F2%2Fe003912.atom\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003912\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 比较在类风湿关节炎口服试验(ORAL)监测中接受托法替尼与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)复合结果和部分事件的扩展风险。方法 年龄≥50岁、有≥1个额外CV风险因素的类风湿关节炎患者接受托法替尼5毫克或10毫克,每天2次或TNFi。MACE(非致命性心肌梗死(MI)、非致命性中风或心血管疾病死亡(MACE-3))通过依次增加心血管疾病事件(不稳定型心绞痛住院(MACE-4)、冠状动脉血运重建(MACE-5)、短暂性脑缺血发作(MACE-6)、外周血管疾病(MACE-7))、心力衰竭(HF)住院(MACE-8)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE;(MACE-8加VTE))来扩展。评估了MACE和各个组成部分的HRs(托法替尼 vs TNFi)。结果 联合剂量和单独剂量托法替尼与 TNFi 相比,MACE-4 至 MACE-8 的 HR 相似。每天服用两次、每次 5 毫克的托法替尼与 TNFi 相比,MACE-8 加 VTE 的风险相似(HR 1.12(0.82-1.52)),但每天服用两次、每次 10 毫克的托法替尼与 TNFi 相比,MACE-8 加 VTE 的风险更高(HR 1.38(1.02-1.85))。服用托法替尼与服用 TNFi 相比,发生心肌梗死的风险更高,但其他个别心血管事件的风险并无差异。在扩展的 MACE 定义中,对于患有动脉粥样硬化性 CV 疾病或年龄≥65 岁的患者,使用托法替尼比 TNFi 的风险更高。结论 在 ORAL Surveillance 中,所有缺血性 CV 事件和 HF 的复合 CV 终点风险似乎与使用托法替尼和 TNFi 没有区别。与TNFi相比,每天两次、每次10毫克的托法替尼的总体CV风险更高,这主要是由于VTE的增加。试验注册号[NCT02092467][1]。如有合理要求,可提供数据。辉瑞将应要求提供支持本研究结果的数据,但须经审查。根据某些标准、条件和例外情况,辉瑞还可提供相关的去标识化参与者个人数据。[1]:/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02092467&atom=%2Frmdopen%2F10%2F2%2Fe003912.atom
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study
Objectives Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance. Methods Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components. Results HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years. Conclusion In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE. Trial registration number [NCT02092467][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual de-identified participant data.See for more information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02092467&atom=%2Frmdopen%2F10%2F2%2Fe003912.atom
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
期刊最新文献
Agreement between patient-reported flares and clinically significant flare status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission: data from the ARCTIC REWIND trials. Development of a multivariable prediction model for progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Inflammatory biomarkers predicting long-term remission and active disease in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a population-based study of the Nordic JIA cohort. Comparison of established and preliminarily proposed ASAS MRI working group cut-offs for inflammatory MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Persistence of power Doppler ultrasonography-detected synovitis over 1 year of follow-up predicts poor prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: the SONORE prospective longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1