统一体的梯度:集体行动中的新兴超级单位

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1162/desi_a_00754
Stephen Neely;Michael Arnold Mages
{"title":"统一体的梯度:集体行动中的新兴超级单位","authors":"Stephen Neely;Michael Arnold Mages","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As design practice shifts from designing material goods to shaping and facilitating social situations, there is a compelling need to develop a richer understanding of specific social relations as facilitated by design. This article explores bodied unisons—enkinaesthetic entrainments of self + other. We present these unison acts as identifiable patterns of behavior that are observable when people coordinate, patterns that foster a move from individual to superunit. Extending the metaphor of musical unison, this article provides perspective on the varied qualities of consensus, offering insight for those designing to coordinate behavior. The disciplines of service design, interaction design, and experience design all aim to coordinate behavior toward specific ends. In each discipline, there are two or more entities (the client and the service provider, for instance) searching for congruence, and the success or failure of the interaction can be assessed through this spectrum of unisons. This study explores the definition of unison as an enkinaesthetic embodied act, provides a framework for analysis, and concludes with implications for the design profession and some ethical considerations regarding designed unisons. The analytical framework encourages novel attention to shared experience, opening avenues for intervention in experiential design fields. As a metaphoric construct and as embodied performance, unison offers participants a sense of stability and cooperation with varying degrees of independence and agency.","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"40 2","pages":"42-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Gradient of Unisons: The Emergent Superunit in Collective Action\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Neely;Michael Arnold Mages\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/desi_a_00754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As design practice shifts from designing material goods to shaping and facilitating social situations, there is a compelling need to develop a richer understanding of specific social relations as facilitated by design. This article explores bodied unisons—enkinaesthetic entrainments of self + other. We present these unison acts as identifiable patterns of behavior that are observable when people coordinate, patterns that foster a move from individual to superunit. Extending the metaphor of musical unison, this article provides perspective on the varied qualities of consensus, offering insight for those designing to coordinate behavior. The disciplines of service design, interaction design, and experience design all aim to coordinate behavior toward specific ends. In each discipline, there are two or more entities (the client and the service provider, for instance) searching for congruence, and the success or failure of the interaction can be assessed through this spectrum of unisons. This study explores the definition of unison as an enkinaesthetic embodied act, provides a framework for analysis, and concludes with implications for the design profession and some ethical considerations regarding designed unisons. The analytical framework encourages novel attention to shared experience, opening avenues for intervention in experiential design fields. As a metaphoric construct and as embodied performance, unison offers participants a sense of stability and cooperation with varying degrees of independence and agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DESIGN ISSUES\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"42-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DESIGN ISSUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680935/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680935/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着设计实践从设计物质产品转向塑造和促进社会情境,我们迫切需要对设计所促进的特定社会关系有更丰富的理解。本文探讨了肢体合一--自我与他人的共鸣。我们将这些齐奏行为描述为人们协调时可观察到的可识别行为模式,这些模式促进了从个体到超单元的转变。本文以音乐的齐奏为隐喻,对共识的各种特质进行了延伸,为设计协调行为的人员提供了启示。服务设计、交互设计和体验设计等学科都旨在协调行为,以达到特定目的。在每一门学科中,都有两个或更多的实体(例如客户和服务提供者)在寻求一致性,而互动的成败可以通过这种一致性来评估。本研究探讨了将 "统一 "定义为一种 "体现 "的审美行为,提供了一个分析框架,并总结了对设计行业的影响以及有关设计统一的一些伦理考虑。分析框架鼓励人们以新颖的方式关注共同体验,为体验式设计领域的干预开辟了途径。作为一种隐喻结构和具体表现,齐奏为参与者提供了一种稳定感和合作感,以及不同程度的独立性和能动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Gradient of Unisons: The Emergent Superunit in Collective Action
As design practice shifts from designing material goods to shaping and facilitating social situations, there is a compelling need to develop a richer understanding of specific social relations as facilitated by design. This article explores bodied unisons—enkinaesthetic entrainments of self + other. We present these unison acts as identifiable patterns of behavior that are observable when people coordinate, patterns that foster a move from individual to superunit. Extending the metaphor of musical unison, this article provides perspective on the varied qualities of consensus, offering insight for those designing to coordinate behavior. The disciplines of service design, interaction design, and experience design all aim to coordinate behavior toward specific ends. In each discipline, there are two or more entities (the client and the service provider, for instance) searching for congruence, and the success or failure of the interaction can be assessed through this spectrum of unisons. This study explores the definition of unison as an enkinaesthetic embodied act, provides a framework for analysis, and concludes with implications for the design profession and some ethical considerations regarding designed unisons. The analytical framework encourages novel attention to shared experience, opening avenues for intervention in experiential design fields. As a metaphoric construct and as embodied performance, unison offers participants a sense of stability and cooperation with varying degrees of independence and agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
期刊最新文献
Introduction The Intersection of Place and Game Design: The Case of Two Classic African Board Games The Disobedience of Design, (vol. Radical Thinkers in Design) Ethnographies of Unimagined Possibilities: Toward a Conversational Paradigm for Human-Centered Design Research Design and Making Things Better: Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1