约旦阿拉伯语中的非规范协调句法:实验调查

Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1515/opli-2024-0001
Eman Al Khalaf, Bassil Mashaqba, Rawan Aldiqs
{"title":"约旦阿拉伯语中的非规范协调句法:实验调查","authors":"Eman Al Khalaf, Bassil Mashaqba, Rawan Aldiqs","doi":"10.1515/opli-2024-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-canonical coordination occurs when non-constituents are conjoined. Two major types of non-canonical coordination are gapping and non-constituent coordination (NCC). Non-canonical coordination has received interest for its relevance to core issues in syntax, such as constituency and phrase structure. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it provides empirical evidence for non-canonical coordination from Jordanian Arabic (JA) via an experimental investigation. Two acceptability judgment tasks (rating on a Likert scale) were designed to investigate the status of gapping and NCC in JA. A generalized linear model (GLM) was fit to the data, using the (<jats:italic>glm</jats:italic>) function from the <jats:italic>mlogit</jats:italic> package in R. There was a main effect of gapping (<jats:italic>χ</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 13.203, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and NCC (<jats:italic>χ</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 15.371, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) on the acceptability of the constructions in the positive direction. Second, the article provides an analysis of the facts that is couched in terms of left-to-right syntax via a hybrid analysis that assumes that non-canonical coordination can have two sources: a complementizer phrase source and a vP source.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The syntax of non-canonical coordination in Jordanian Arabic: An experimental investigation\",\"authors\":\"Eman Al Khalaf, Bassil Mashaqba, Rawan Aldiqs\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/opli-2024-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-canonical coordination occurs when non-constituents are conjoined. Two major types of non-canonical coordination are gapping and non-constituent coordination (NCC). Non-canonical coordination has received interest for its relevance to core issues in syntax, such as constituency and phrase structure. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it provides empirical evidence for non-canonical coordination from Jordanian Arabic (JA) via an experimental investigation. Two acceptability judgment tasks (rating on a Likert scale) were designed to investigate the status of gapping and NCC in JA. A generalized linear model (GLM) was fit to the data, using the (<jats:italic>glm</jats:italic>) function from the <jats:italic>mlogit</jats:italic> package in R. There was a main effect of gapping (<jats:italic>χ</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 13.203, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and NCC (<jats:italic>χ</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 15.371, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) on the acceptability of the constructions in the positive direction. Second, the article provides an analysis of the facts that is couched in terms of left-to-right syntax via a hybrid analysis that assumes that non-canonical coordination can have two sources: a complementizer phrase source and a vP source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2024-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2024-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非规范配位发生在非组成成分连在一起的情况下。非规范搭配的两种主要类型是间隙搭配和非成分搭配(NCC)。非规范搭配因其与句法的核心问题(如成分和短语结构)相关而受到关注。本文有两个目的。首先,本文通过实验调查为约旦阿拉伯语(JA)中的非规范搭配提供了实证证据。本文设计了两个可接受性判断任务(采用李克特量表评分),以调查约旦阿拉伯语中间隙和非规范协调的状况。使用 R 软件包 mlogit 中的 (glm) 函数对数据进行了广义线性模型(GLM)拟合。间隙(χ 2 = 13.203,p < 0.001)和 NCC(χ 2 = 15.371,p < 0.001)对构词法可接受性的影响是正向的。其次,文章通过混合分析法从左右句法的角度对事实进行了分析,假定非规范协调可以有两个来源:补语短语来源和 vP 来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
The syntax of non-canonical coordination in Jordanian Arabic: An experimental investigation
Non-canonical coordination occurs when non-constituents are conjoined. Two major types of non-canonical coordination are gapping and non-constituent coordination (NCC). Non-canonical coordination has received interest for its relevance to core issues in syntax, such as constituency and phrase structure. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it provides empirical evidence for non-canonical coordination from Jordanian Arabic (JA) via an experimental investigation. Two acceptability judgment tasks (rating on a Likert scale) were designed to investigate the status of gapping and NCC in JA. A generalized linear model (GLM) was fit to the data, using the (glm) function from the mlogit package in R. There was a main effect of gapping (χ 2 = 13.203, p < 0.001) and NCC (χ 2 = 15.371, p < 0.001) on the acceptability of the constructions in the positive direction. Second, the article provides an analysis of the facts that is couched in terms of left-to-right syntax via a hybrid analysis that assumes that non-canonical coordination can have two sources: a complementizer phrase source and a vP source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1